Qualitatively Wrong About Quantitative Easing?

by: Max Fraad Wolff

The Federal Reserve is under attack for its most recent extraordinary policy announcements. Angry and accusatory comment is streaming in from Brazil, Germany, China, leading lights in the financial industry and newly minted/empowered representatives of the GOP. Some fear inflation, others dollar devaluation. Financial firms are not excited about further stretching the gigantic Fed balance sheet. Lost in much of the cacophony is a very central part of what is going on. The Fed is buying American government debt at a rapid and impactful clip. The Fed now owns more Treasury Securities - U.S. government debt - than China or Japan. By March 2011 the Fed will own more IOUs from Uncle Sam than China, Germany and Brazil combined. Our central bank is subsidizing the growing cost of our massive indebtedness. The Fed is buying more and more, longer maturity government debt. They have promised about $600 billion more in buying and will be turning some of their trillion dollars in mortgaged backed securities into Treasuries as well. Unlike other buyers of U.S. debt, the Fed refunds a significant portion of the interest it receives at the end of the year. Needless to say, this reduces the cost of the debt. Fed refunding of earnings on holdings will exceed $50 billion in 2011.

As the Fed moves to cushion the cost fallout of past and continuing fiscal policy excess, it is being assailed by once and future perpetrators and beneficiaries of this excess. All this buying of U.S. debt pushes up the price and pushes down the yield of Uncle Sam’s IOUs. Owners of government debt see the value of their assets rise. The government is able to borrow more and pay less for its borrowing. This is no minor matter as we rack up trillion dollar budget deficits year after year. Major exporters are reliant on U.S. buying. Our public is tapped out; leading firms prefer the returns in distant lands. Our central government has stepped into the breach with excessive gusto. Now the Fed is trying to help out. In short, the Fed is trying to keep the weight of debt from damaging the federal government’s ability to keep acting as the engine of America’s economy. Subsidizing the value and lowering the cost of federal debt is a big part of the aim and impact of quantitative easing. It is a vast effort to keep the interest cost of our debt down and the ability of Uncle Sam to borrow up. Of course there are some currency pressures and possible future inflation issues as well.

Click to enlarge

Everyone is talking about sovereign debt, default, bailout and quantitative easing II (QEII). Very few are connecting the dots. That is what this short piece tries to do. Above you see a graph (graph 1). All data is taken from the U.S. Treasury and the Bureau of the Public Debt.[i] Graph 1 looks at the billions that the U.S. government spends each year to service its debt. We see that the annual interest expense on U.S. government debt has been falling. I'm measuring only interest as we are constantly issuing more new debt than the debt we are paying off. Principle is growing, not shrinking. The cost of our mounting debt has been falling. This is counter intuitive and violates the presumptions of most formal models and arguments. Keep in mind that these are large figures, hundreds of billions of dollars and represent well over 10% of tax collection revenues.

Click to enlarge

As we have borrowed more and more we have had to pay less and less to borrow this money. The above graph (graph 2) employs U.S. Treasury data to look at total U.S. national debt outstanding over roughly the same period used in graph 1. It is clear that the total debt has been rising very rapidly. As we borrow more and more we pay less and less as a percent of our debt. This might remind you of the conundrum of Japan where rising national debt and falling, low, yields on government debt have been the norms for many years. It might also recast the present debates about deficits, debt and quantitative easing. The government could be borrowing for shorter time periods. As the length of a loan decreases so too does the interest rate - assuming normal times and circumstances. Shorter duration, or maturity, loans are cheaper. We did try that from 1999-2007. For the last few years the average duration of U.S. government debt has been slowly rising. The average maturity of U.S. government debt is now about 70 months, a little less than 6 years.

The Federal Reserve’s Nov. 3 announcement to buy $600 billion in additional U.S. Treasuries could be seen as an effort to extend the ability of the U.S. Government to owe more and more and pay less and less for the privilege? This would suggest that the vast majority of discussion, critical and laudatory, has largely missed the story.

Another way to look at the same phenomena is to use data from the Federal Reserve on the interest rate paid on the 3-year U.S. Treasury. The graph below uses Federal Reserve data on select interest rates and displays these rates against the 39 year average rate on 3-year U.S. Treasuries.[ii] In graph 3 the red lines detail the average yield on 3-year Treasuries. The nearly 40 year average is 6.6%. Today the yield is under 1%. Graph 3 is a picture of the falling price of owing more for America. This has long been the order of the days, weeks, months and years.

Click to enlarge

Perhaps discussion of QEII could be profitably re-framed to focus on this central basic fact. The Fed is risking some reputation and significant political criticism to act aggressively to keep up the price and keep down the cost of U.S. government borrowing. The Fed returns interest earnings on Treasuries, other loans and bonds to the U.S. Treasury after it has taken what it needs to cover costs. In 2010 the Fed transferred nearly $50 billion to the U.S. Treasury. 2011 will see the Fed transfer even more as earnings will rise on its large and growing pool of Treasuries and mortgaged backed securities. Other investors in U.S. government debt are not in the habit of partially refunding interest payments. Discussions of QEII that ignore the financial health of the U.S. government miss a big part of the story.

[i] US Treasury Department: www.treasurydirect.gov/

[ii] Federal Reserve H.15 Select Interest Rates: federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm

Disclosure: No positions in assets mentioned