It’s a little late for gift-giving, I admit, but here are three very interesting books about investing that aren’t going to get into my blog, Economic Principals, unless I write about them now. Two of them are already classics. The third seems destined to achieve that status. As to the various joys of spending money, it is hard to beat the Weekend edition of the Financial Times. But EP remains interested in what others have to say about the deep pleasures of making money.
Your Money and Your Life: A Lifetime Approach to Money Management, by Robert Z. Aliber. I am a great fan of the walk-around-the-pond-with-a-companionable-friend format. This new version of a 1982 book began when the benefits office at the University of Chicago asked Aliber to speak to retiring faculty about financial planning. He discovered many of them (at least those not involved in serial marriages) were millionaires, the result of generous pensions, rising real estate prices and the bull market in stocks. “After my presentation, I would get calls – let’s have lunch.” This book collects a couple of dozen such conversations and organizes them under three headings: decisions involving expenditure, investment and financial planning. Wondering whether to buy a new car or one that has been slightly used? To prefer public to private education? To rent or buy? To load up on insurance? To annuitize or not? Curious about how to construct a bond ladder? Anxious about senior health care? Aliber is full of wisdom on all these counts and more. Retired now after 39 years as a professor at Chicago’s Booth School of Business, he is author of The International Money Game, as well as the inheritor who has turned Charles P. Kindleberger’s classic Manias, Panics and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises into an ongoing text.
A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing, by Burton G. Malkiel. It was Princeton University professor Malkiel who pioneered the reader-friendly walk format, starting in 1973. Then the idea that markets were so quick to incorporate the latest information in prices that there could be no exploitable trading strategy was new. This ”efficient-markets hypothesis (EMH)” led directly to the proposition that you would do better buying and holding a basket of stocks representing the market as a whole than by investing in professionally-managed mutual funds was startling. The first index fund had yet to appear. Nearly forty years later, the basic insight seems pretty clear: most individual investors do better buying a piece of the overall market than by trying to outsmart it. In the opening pages of this tenth edition (now so thoroughly revised as to include a history of bubbles, a review of new investment technologies, and a guide to all kinds of investments and tax strategies), Malkiel lets the numbers make his case. If you had put $10,000 into an S&P-500 Index fund in 1969 and reinvested dividends you would have a portfolio worth $463,000 today, as opposed to the $258,000 return from an average actively-managed mutual fund. Even in the last ten years you would have done well if you had followed Malkiel’s injunction to regularly rebalance your portfolio. His suggested index fund portfolio for “aging baby boomers” (containing bonds, US stocks and those of various other nations, and shares of real estate investment trusts) doubled during the years 2000-2010, while an index of US stocks alone actually lost a little value.
The Evolution of Technical Analysis: Financial Prediction from Babylonian Tablets to Bloomberg Terminals, by Andrew W. Lo and Jasmine Hasanhodzic. The search for patterns in market trading turns out to be one of the truly durable passions of humankind. Andrew Lo, a distinguished finance professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Hasanhodzic, an MIT PHD in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science who builds quantitative investment strategies for Alpha Simplex Group, apparently had some time on their hands, because Evolution of Technical Analysis is a light-hearted yet thorough and penetrating tour of quantitative analysis of markets from Mesopotamian times to the high-tech present. Technical analysis – attempts to predict future prices by looking for patterns in the past – has a bad reputation in modern economics, they note; many of its terms seem abstruse or outmoded: “it is easy to see how a discipline that involves eye-balling charts for patterns with names like ‘head and shoulders’ and ‘cup with a handle’ might seem at first blush more akin to astrology than science,” they write. (Fundamental analysis, the alternative to technical analysis among investors, fares better in popular opinion because its reasoning is essentially economic.) In fact, insights into human psychology have remained much the same from ancient Athens to Charles Dow, founder of Dow Jones, to today’s “quants,” who search for bargains in the form of various cognitive biases (overconfidence, overreaction, loss aversion, and herding, to name the most widely known). High-speed traders can accentuate the wizards’ edge. Malkiel’s obituary for technical analysis – “under scientific scrutiny, chart-reading must share a pedestal with alchemy” – was premature, they say. “As long as humans, not robots, make markets, bubbles and crashes will be a reality.” And behavioral economics – the logical extension of technical analysis – offers some hope of damping the swings.