A year ago, Costco (COST) suggested that the “estimated negative impact to comparable store sales results from poor weather conditions” was approximately -50 Bps in December 2009. This year, the company suggests a -100 Bps impact to its comp store sales. On the other hand, BJ suggests that the situation is more favorable, and boosted its comp store sales by +100 Bps this year versus LY. So, who do you believe? BJ or COST? We’re going with the former and not the latter. We would advise the folks at COST that if they’re going to utilize the weather excuse, they should go back to last year’s transcript and double-check what faux excuse they used a year ago. Today, the company needs its credit operation and a favorable tax rate to hit the consensus estimate of $1.40. The fact is that BJ has consistently delivered stronger comp store sales results this fiscal year (ex-fuel) and delivered stronger results in December 2010 as well… minus the Red Card! The company should have received a top-line boost this year via favorable weather (see BJ). Weak. Next year’s EPS estimates for TGT are materially too high. Despite relatively strong comp store sales, the retail division’s EBIT margin decline is cause for longer-term concern. Note the press release at Destination Maternity Corporation (DEST) that suggests that this particular calendar shift boosted their comp store sales by +90 Bps in December 2010. That said, the company’s 3-year comp sales run rate still decelerated to +9% in the 2-month Holiday period versus +14% in Q3 2010. The following retailers reported a relatively stronger comp store sales result in December 2010 versus November 2010 (relative strength/improving trend): The following retailers reported a relatively weaker comp store sales result in December 2010 versus November 2010 (relative weakness/decelerating trend): In January 2010, retailers generally reported material merchandise margin improvements versus the prior year. Weeks #1 and #2 were generally considered to be the strongest fiscal weeks in January 2010. Week #3 was generally held to be the weakest fiscal week in January 2010. The Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and Northeast were generally held to be the strongest comp store sales regions in January 2010. The West and Northwest were generally held to be the weakest comp store sales regions in January 2010. COST suggested that weather provided a top-line headwind in January 2010. COST also suggested that a shift in the timing of the Super Bowl negatively impacted sales in January 2010 versus the prior year and that sales in Asia were negatively impacted by the shift in the timing of Chinese New Year.
SKS (+6.5% improvement in December 2010 versus November 2010)
JWN (+3.3% improvement in December 2010 versus November 2010)
HOTT (+0.4% improvement in December 2010 versus November 2010)
SSI (-0.5% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
DDS (-1.0% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
ZUMZ (-11.5% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
AEO (-11.0% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
WTSLA (-9.1% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
GPS (-8.0% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010)
JCP (-5.5% decline in December 2010 versus November 2010
In January 2010, many retailers ‘beat’ consensus comp store sales expectations. The strongest performance was in soft home, hard home, women’s apparel, handbags, and shoes. Weak categories included men’s apparel and children’s apparel.

