-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I’d like to thank the representatives from Atheros (ATHR) for their time answering my probing and skeptical questions. Broadcom (BRCM) and Marvell (MRVL) are also big Wi-Fi chipset players, though I didn’t speak with them. Atheros provided me with a great deal of insight into what 802.11n really means (and put up with my probing and skeptical questions), though it must be said they certainly are biased in favor of deploying it. The big news about -N isn’t the speed boost. Sure, the 80-100mb effective throughput will be useful for the small fraction of the population looking to stream high-def video around their home. What are overlooked, however, are the range improvements and the resulting increase in perceived user quality.
802.11n will make Wi-Fi a much more reliable infrastructure. This means that existing applications like mobile VoIP should work better, and new ones not conceived today will become possible. We’ve gone from 802.11b to a to g but none of the technologies looks to be as big a leap as 802.11n. History shows that a high quality, reliable infrastructure results in more use and I think Wi-Fi is about to make that jump.
The new specification is nearly complete. In fact, the latest draft was just approved by the IEEE task force . There are likely to be small changes going forward, but certainly nothing that cannot be corrected in software. This means that systems shipping in February will be 99.99% compliant. The mere act of shipping these products assures that no vendor will throw sand into the gear of the standards body (and oh do they turn slowly) and risk stranding a large installed user base.
The availability of a more reliable and faster Wi-Fi infrastructure in the home is one driver in what I see as my biggest takeaway from CES this year, given the fact that home networks are becoming complex and difficult to manage.
Related Articles
|


























