AOL on Monday paid $315 million—$300 million in cash—for the Huffington Post and while most are focusing on the content and editorial plans, observers may want to look at the balance sheet and future flexibility.
Simply put, AOL drained nearly half of its cash balance for Arianna Huffington and the gang. Nice deal for Huffington, but you have to wonder if AOL spent too much.
Here’s a quick look at the numbers.
- $801.8 million: AOL’s cash and equivalents balance as of Dec. 31.
- $300 million: Cash handed over for the Huffington Post.
- $501.8 million: New cash balance.
- $107 million: Cash flow in the fourth quarter
- 3 quarters: Approximate amount of cash flow AOL is paying for Huffington Post (if you assume AOL’s prospects stay on par with the fourth quarter).
- More unique users. (AOL and HuffPo has 117 million uniques in the U.S. and AOL Media reported 84 million U.S. uniques last week).
- Someone to run the content strategy. Huffington will now oversee AOL’s content operations.
- More than $50 million in additional revenue in 2011.
- Cost savings of about $20 million a year.
Was it worth it to AOL? If AOL used stock and cash perhaps. Draining the war chest on one bet, however, may be too risky given AOL’s financial profile and evolution. Hudson Square Research analyst Rory Maher generally likes the deal with a few caveats. Maher notes that Huffington Post is a property that fits well with AOL and cross promotion can drive traffic and ad revenue. The problems is AOL drained too much cash on Huffington Post. Maher writes:
We believe there is material risk associated with spending nearly half of the company’s cash balance on one transaction.
If HuffPo gives AOL the content juice it needs to complete its transformation and become a cash cow the deal was worth it. If not, $300 million in cold hard cash could sting.