Sevcon Is An Overlooked Play On The Growth Of Electric Vehicles

John Leonard, CFA profile picture
John Leonard, CFA
1.24K Followers

Summary

  • The stock (which has no analyst coverage) has given back all of the gains from earlier this year despite the continued top line growth and margin expansion.
  • A JV with a Tier 1 auto supplier should drive market share gains in China, which is expected to be the largest market for electric vehicles within five years.
  • An oversubscribed rights offering in September 2014 provides the funds to support investment in sales/marketing and R&D as well as a potential acquisition.
  • The stock trades at a significant discount to its closest peer on an EV/Revenue basis; unlike Sevcon, this peer is not EBITDA positive.
  • There is a low float and stable shareholder base as insiders own 26% and Gabelli owns 50%.

Company overview

Sevcon (SEV) manufactures microprocessor-based controls for zero emission and hybrid electric vehicles (94% of LTM revenue) used to vary the speed and movement of vehicles, integrate specialized functions and optimize the energy consumption of the vehicle's power source. Customers include manufacturers of on- and off-road vehicles such as cars, buses, motorcycles, forklifts, aerial lifts, mining vehicles, airport ground support vehicles, utility vehicles and sweepers.

SEV also manufactures special metalized film capacitors (6% of LTM revenue) used as components in the power electronics, signaling and audio equipment markets.

Market quickly prices in a recovery - and prices it out just as quickly

From December 2013 - February 2014 the stock almost tripled as conditions stabilized and visibility improved following weak industrial demand at the beginning of 2013. However, the stock gave back a majority of the gains despite the continuing improvement in the growth outlook. For example, 3Q14 was the sixth consecutive quarter of sequential revenue growth (see chart below) as strong double-digit growth in Asia and the U.S. more than offset flat sales in Europe and lower demand from manufacturers of mining equipment.

Gross margins have improved from 36.6% in 2013 to 39% in the LTM due to an improved product mix. The outsourcing of manufacturing provides consistently high operating leverage. A workforce reduction in 2Q13 brought the cost structure in line with the lower revenue at the time and reduced the OpEx run rate by $2 million, which helped improve the operating margin from (1.1)% in 2013 to 4.2% in the LTM. A majority of this operating income drops down to net income given the low effective tax rate as a result of lower foreign tax rates (including a reduction in the U.K. rate scheduled to take effect this year) and ~$6.7 million of foreign NOLs that do not expire.

This article was written by

John Leonard, CFA profile picture
1.24K Followers
I focus on the microcap space (market cap below $250 million) because it is one of the most inefficient and "alpha rich" areas of the global equity market, which provides the greatest opportunity to generate alpha through fundamental research. I use a bottom up, investment decision making process. The ideal investment has an asymmetric risk/return profile with a limited downside (e.g. high net cash balance, strong cash flow) and significant upside (e.g. asset value extraction, overlooked business model transition). Microcaps are particularly attractive to the following groups: Activist investors. A small absolute investment (on a dollar basis) can be leveraged into a relatively large position (as a percentage of shares outstanding), which provides a greater ability to demand change. Private equity firms. The persistent microcap discount can be “arbed away” via an LBO with the new owners accruing all of the gains for themselves. The small absolute size of many microcaps on an EV basis significantly expands the number of firms able to pursue this strategy. This inefficiency exists for several reasons. A lack of analyst coverage due to lower trading volume (less soft dollars from HF/MF), the global settlement that permanently severed the link between research/banking and the rise in electronic trading/decimalization. Moreover, none of these trends are likely to reverse for the foreseeable future (if ever). A lack of institutional products given the natural capacity constraint for new/existing managers. An inability to effectively implement a passive approach (e.g. ETFs, index funds) due to the lower liquidity and wider bid/ask spread. However, each of these obstacles can be overcome by using a combination of electronic trading tools (e.g. algos) and patience in building a positive size. Inaccurate and persistent misconceptions about microcaps (e.g. they are riskier than larger cap stocks). I currently trade for my personal account but would like to move into the investment management side of the industry.

Analyst’s Disclosure: The author has no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours. The author wrote this article themselves, and it expresses their own opinions. The author is not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). The author has no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

More on SEV-OLD-DEFUNCT-18310

Related Stocks

SymbolLast Price% Chg
SEV-OLD
--