Halliburton: Is Its Discount Warranted? 2 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Once that is over, or as soon as the Bush Administration was out of office, my thinking went that huge no-bid contracts allowing the company to charge the government anything they wanted would vanish, and Halliburton's financial performance would lag. Hence, the stock is discounting this reality in the marketplace.
With the Halliburton spin-off of its KBR, Inc. (KBR) subsidiary, all of the sudden we have the division with much of the Iraq war criticism tied to it trading on its own. After Halliburton disperses its majority stake to shareholders, Halliburton will look a lot more like a leading oil services company, and much less like a company being propped up by the Bush Administration, and more specifically, former CEO Dick Cheney. Interestingly, in 2006 KBR represented 43% of sales for HAL, but only 7% of operating income.
HAL KBR 3-month comparison chart

Related Articles
|





















If HAL shareholders are given a little bit of KBR (relative to their HAL stake), they will either sell the KBR stock when they get it because it is a just a small amount and doesn't really fit with their other regular sized positions, or they just keep it there. The result is either 1) lots of selling of KBR, or thousands of people owning odd-lots of KBR (under 100 shares), which is costly from a shareholder services prospective.
If they can get some investors to swap all of their HAL for KBR, those issues are reduced and HAL's total share count drops without the company needing to do a buyback.
If I owned HAL I would not trade HAL for KBR, but they are hoping some people will.