When you are retired and living on your dividends, it can be difficult to budget for the future when a company’s dividends are variable.
How variable is variable?
The following table examines the amount of the annual dividends for companies A and B:
Year | Company A | Company B |
1 | $1.00 | $1.00 |
2 | $1.25 | $1.17 |
3 | $2.25 | $1.38 |
4 | $2.29 | $1.61 |
5 | $2.64 | $1.89 |
6 | $2.91 | $2.22 |
7 | $3.26 | $2.60 |
8 | $3.30 | $3.05 |
9 | $3.72 | $3.58 |
10 | $4.20 | $4.20 |
They both start with the same amount. They both increase their dividends every year. They both end with the same amount. Which is “better”?
The following table examines the amount of the increases from the previous year for companies A and B:
Year | Company A | Company B |
1 | ||
2 | $0.25 | $0.17 |
3 | $1.00 | $0.20 |
4 | $0.04 | $0.24 |
5 | $0.35 | $0.28 |
6 | $0.27 | $0.33 |
7 | $0.35 | $0.38 |
8 | $0.04 | $0.45 |
9 | $0.42 | $0.53 |
10 | $0.48 | $0.62 |
The increases for both companies are different every year. It’s not clear from the amounts of the increases which is “better.”
Quite often in investing, it’s not the amount of a change that is most telling, it is the percentage of the change.
The following table examines the percentages of the increases from the previous year for companies A and B:
Year | Company A | Company B |
1 | ||
2 | 25% | 17% |
3 | 80% | 17% |
4 | 2% | 17% |
5 | 15% | 17% |
6 | 10% | 17% |
7 | 12% | 17% |
8 | 1% | 17% |
9 | 13% | 17% |
10 | 13% | 17% |
Company A’s percentage increases are different every year, ranging from a low of 1% to a high of 80%. This “ride” is quite bumpy. But for company B, the percentages are the same every year. This ride is as smooth as it gets. Note that even though the percentage increase is the same every year, the amount goes up smoothly and dependably each year. This is how your dividends keep up with and often surpass inflation.
When you are retired and living on your dividends, you might find that the smoother the better, so that you can budget more predictably. Naturally, past smoothness is no guarantee of future smoothness.
How do we determine the “bumpiness” of a company? Mathematically, we use the standard deviation of the compound annual growth rate [see the references at the bottom of this article]. I have devised a “bumpiness metric” which will tell at a glance how smooth or bumpy a company’s dividend history has been. For you math geeks, the bumpiness is the standard deviation multiplied by 100 and rounded to the nearest integer. The result is a whole number that tells you whether a company’s dividend history has been smooth or teeth-rattling.
Bumpiness is always measured across a specific range of years: for example, the bumpiness of Procter & Gamble (PG) from 1986 to 2010 is 17. Company B in the example above would have a bumpiness of 0.
Is a bumpiness of 17 good or bad? Statistically, 66% of all dividend growth companies have a bumpiness less than 100, and 95% of all dividend growth companies have a bumpiness less than 200, so anything more than 200 is unusual.
I computed the bumpiness of most of David Fish’s Dividend Champions. Here they are, ordered numerically from least bumpy to most bumpy:
Company | Symbol | Industry | Yrs | Bumpiness |
Conn. Water Service | Utility-Water | 41 | 2 | |
MGE Energy Inc. | Utility-Electric/Gas | 34 | 4 | |
WGL Holdings Inc. | Utility-Gas | 35 | 5 | |
National Fuel Gas | Utility-Gas | 40 | 6 | |
American States Water | Utility-Water | 57 | 7 | |
SJW Corp. | Utility-Water | 44 | 8 | |
Energen Corp. | Utility-Gas | 29 | 9 | |
Piedmont Natural Gas | Utility-Gas | 33 | 9 | |
Questar Corp. | Utility-Gas | 32 | 9 | |
Helmerich & Payne Inc. | Oil & Gas | 38 | 11 | |
Middlesex Water Co. | Utility-Water | 38 | 11 | |
AT&T Inc. | Telecommunications | 27 | 13 | |
Black Hills Corp. | Utility-Electric | 41 | 13 | |
Consolidated Edison | Utility-Electric | 37 | 13 | |
Diebold Inc. | Business Equipment | 58 | 13 | |
Gorman-Rupp Company | Machinery | 39 | 13 | |
Johnson & Johnson | Drugs/Consumer Prod. | 49 | 14 | |
Tennant Company | Machinery | 39 | 14 | |
Stanley Black & Decker | Tools/Security Products | 44 | 15 | |
Family Dollar Stores | Retail-Discount | 35 | 16 | |
ExxonMobil Corp. | Oil & Gas | 29 | 17 | |
McGraw-Hill Companies | MHP | Publishing | 38 | 17 |
Procter & Gamble Co. | Consumer Products | 55 | 17 | |
Carlisle Companies | Rubber & Plastics | 34 | 18 | |
RPM International Inc. | Chemical-Specialty | 37 | 18 | |
Stepan Company | Cleaning Products | 43 | 19 | |
Emerson Electric | Industrial Equipment | 54 | 20 | |
Cincinnati Financial | Insurance | 50 | 21 | |
Coca-Cola Company | Beverages-Non-alcoholic | 49 | 21 | |
Dover Corp. | Machinery | 55 | 21 | |
Abbott Laboratories | Drugs | 39 | 22 | |
Chubb Corp. | Insurance | 46 | 22 | |
Nordson Corp. | Machinery | 47 | 22 | |
PPG Industries Inc. | Conglomerate | 40 | 22 | |
California Water Service | Utility-Water | 44 | 23 | |
Air Products & Chem. | Chemical-Specialty | 29 | 24 | |
3M Company | Conglomerate | 53 | 25 | |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | Personal Products | 48 | 25 | |
W.W. Grainger Inc. | Electronics-Wholesale | 40 | 25 | |
Telephone & Data Sys. | Telecommunications | 37 | 26 | |
Clorox Company | Cleaning Products | 33 | 27 | |
ABM Industries Inc. | Business Services | 44 | 28 | |
Commerce Bancshares | Banking | 43 | 28 | |
Lancaster Colony Corp. | Food/Consumer Prod. | 48 | 28 | |
Sherwin-Williams Co. | Paints | 33 | 29 | |
Parker-Hannifin Corp. | Industrial Equipment | 54 | 30 | |
RLI Corp. | Insurance | 35 | 30 | |
Target Corp. | Retail-Discount | 43 | 30 | |
Genuine Parts Co. | Auto Parts | 55 | 31 | |
H.B. Fuller Company | Chemical-Specialty | 42 | 31 | |
Pitney Bowes Inc. | Business Equipment | 29 | 31 | |
Walgreen Company | Retail-Drugstores | 35 | 32 | |
Automatic Data Proc. | Business Services | 36 | 33 | |
Wesco Financial Corp. | Insurance/Bus. Services | 39 | 33 | |
Hormel Foods Corp. | Food Processing | 45 | 34 | |
PepsiCo Inc. | Beverages/Snack Food | 38 | 34 | |
Old Republic Int'l | Insurance | 30 | 35 | |
HCP Inc. | REIT-Health Care | 26 | 36 | |
Bemis Company | Packaging | 28 | 38 | |
C.R. Bard Inc. | Medical Instruments | 39 | 38 | |
AFLAC Inc. | Insurance | 28 | 39 | |
Raven Industries | Business Equipment | 25 | 39 | |
Eaton Vance Corp. | Financial Services | 30 | 42 | |
Illinois Tool Works | Machinery | 47 | 42 | |
Northwest Natural Gas | Utility-Gas | 55 | 42 | |
McCormick & Co. | Food Processing | 25 | 43 | |
Tootsie Roll Industries | Confectioner | 46 | 43 | |
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | Retail-Discount | 37 | 43 | |
Pentair Inc. | Industrial Equipment | 35 | 44 | |
Sonoco Products Co. | Packaging | 28 | 44 | |
Becton Dickinson & Co. | Medical Instruments | 38 | 45 | |
Brown-Forman Class B | Beverages-Alcoholic | 27 | 46 | |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | Personal Products | 39 | 47 | |
Valspar Corp. | Paints | 30 | 49 | |
Sysco Corp. | Food-Wholesale | 41 | 53 | |
United Bankshares Inc. | Banking | 37 | 54 | |
Sigma-Aldrich Corp. | Chemical-Specialty | 35 | 58 | |
Medtronic Inc. | Medical Devices | 33 | 62 | |
Mine Safety Appliances | Medical/Safety Equip. | 39 | 67 | |
VF Corp. | Apparel | 38 | 71 | |
Weyco Group Inc. | Footwear | 29 | 73 | |
Leggett & Platt Inc. | Furniture/Bldg. Prod. | 39 | 75 | |
Altria Group Inc. | Tobacco | 42 | 81 | |
McDonald's Corp. | Restaurants | 34 | 81 | |
Federal Realty Inv. Trust | REIT-Shopping Centers | 43 | 83 | |
Lowe's Companies | Retail-Home Improv. | 48 | 83 | |
Brady Corp. | Business Services | 25 | 98 | |
NACCO Industries | Machinery/Consumer | 25 | 105 | |
Archer Daniels Midland | Agriculture | 36 | 113 | |
Bowl America Class A | Recreation | 39 | 113 | |
Franklin Resources | Financial Services | 30 | 139 | |
Nucor Corp. | Steel & Iron | 38 | 180 | |
Cintas Corp. | Business Services | 28 | 237 | |
Washington REIT | REIT-Office/Industrial | 39 | 342 | |
CenturyLink Inc. | Telecommunications | 37 | 483 |
From the table above, some might find it surprising that AT&T has a bumpiness of 13, whereas CTL has a bumpiness of 483, even though both are in the telecommunications industry.
In addition to the information I currently provide on my website:
- annual dividends
- percentage increases
- compound annual growth rate
I have added the bumpiness for all companies covered.
In addition, I have created a table that lets you look up a bumpiness and a number of years and, and in one click, you will find which companies match your search criteria.
I propose that dividend investors consider bumpiness when they choose which dividend-growth companies to buy.
May all your dividend investing be smooth!
References:
Compound annual growth rate, or CAGR
Disclosure: I am long ABT, AFL, INTC, JNJ, KO, MCD, MDT, MO, PG, WMT.

