Seeking Alpha
Seeking Alpha Portfolio App for iPad
Finance
(1)

In August’s first Lightning Round, Jim Cramer made calls to six stocks and offered alternatives to two of them. In this article, I explain my opinion about all of these stocks, investigating them from a fundamental perspective. I also used my O-Metrix Grading System where necessary. Here is a fundamental analysis of the stocks mentioned in Cramer’s Lightning Round on Aug 1:

Hyperdynamics Corp. (HDY): Hyperdynamics returned 350% in a year, and Cramer believes that this is a "very speculative stock," that it should not be bought above $5 a share. The Texas-based oil & gas explorer, as of the Aug 1 close, was trading at a P/E ratio of -69.4. Estimated EPS growth for the next year is 44.40%, while earnings increased by 32% this year. Howard Weill has a target price is $8.00, which implies a 52.9% upside potential. However, I am not sure whether this target is based on fundamental reasoning. SMA50 is 16.87%, whereas SMA200 is 19.19%. SMA20 is 10.30%. The stock is trading 32.78% lower than its 52-week high. The stock is extremely volatile. Moreover the share price is extremely expensive for a company with no profits. Avoid buying shares at this price.

City Telecom (CTEL): Cramer rather prefers Windstream (WIN) over City Telecom, although he believes that City Telecom has a safe dividend yield of 6.5%. Here is a brief comparison between these two stocks:

Current as of Aug 1 close.

City Telecom

Windstream

P/E ratio

12.70

22.7

Forward P/E ratio

10.6

14.29

Estimated EPS growth for the next 5 years

19.00%

0.18%

Dividend yield

6.54%

8.23%

Profit margin

16.60%

6.69%

Gross margin

87.06%

61.90%

Upside movement potential

35.5%

18%

O-Metrix scores of City Telecom and Windstream are 10.96 and 2.27, respectively. City Telecom returned 8.2% in the last twelve months, while Windstream returned 5.1%. City Telecom’s debt-to assets ratio is having a free fall for the last five years, while that of Windstream is hovering around alarming rates. City Telecom is currently trading 28.12% lower than its 52-week high, and Windstream is trading 10.72% lower than its 52-week high. Average analyst recommendation is 1.00 for City Telecom, and 2.40 for Windstream (1=Buy, 5=Sell). I like the yield of both companies . City Telecom seems to be a better deal for me.

General Motors (GM): As the automobile industry is facing some problems for the time being, Jim recommends avoiding General Motors. As of the Aug 1 close, the auto maker shows a trailing P/E ratio of 5.6. Analysts expect the company to have an 11.40% annual EPS growth in the next five years. General Motors has a profit margin of 5.0% with no dividends so far. P/S is 0.30, and earnings increased by 220.04% this quarter. Target price is $42.92, indicating a 52.8% increase potential. The stock is trading 28.90% lower than its 52-week high. Debt-to assets ratio is decreasing sharply for the last three years. The stock is still trading in a downward channel which might continue for a while. However, at some point the trend will reverse. Although it has been a rough year for General Motors, I believe current prices offer a compelling entry point.

Magnum Hunter Resources (MHR): Cramer would rather go with Chesapeake Energy (CHK) as Magnum Hunter is “too risky” for now. Here is a brief comparison between these two companies:

Current as of Aug 1 close.

Magnum Hunter Resources

Chesapeake Energy

P/E ratio

-20.2

27.6

Forward P/E ratio

19.7

11.12

Estimated EPS growth for the next 5 years

-

9.08%

Dividend yield

-

1.02%

Profit margin

-52.0%

8.9%

Gross margin

60.5%

83.94%

Upside movement potential

30%

13.5%

Magnum Hunter returned 58.1% in a year, while Chesapeake returned 58.5%. Magnum Hunter is trading 15.82% lower than its 52-week high, and Chesapeake is trading only 3.94% lower than its 52-week high. Magnum Hunter’s debt-to assets ratio is falling sharply for the last five quarters, while Chesapeake’s debt-to assets ratio is unstable. Analysts give a 1.50 recommendation for Magnum Hunter, and 2.30 recommendation for Chesapeake (1=Buy, 5=Sell). Chesapeake is relatively less volatile and has an acceptable P/E ratio when compared to that of Magnum Hunter. Moreover, magnum Hunter has a negative profit margin with no dividend policy. Cramer’s alternative pick is obviously better than Magnum Hunter.

eBay (EBAY): Cramer is a “buyer of eBay,” and he wants investors to “buy some Tuesday morning." The company has a P/E ratio of 25.02, and a forward P/E ratio of 14.29, as of the Aug 1 close. Estimated annualized EPS growth for the next 5 years is 11.92%, which is quite reasonable given the 11.81% EPS growth of last 5 years. Profit margin in 2010 was 17.4%, while the California-based company offers no dividend yield. Target price implies a 16.7% upside movement potential, and the stock is trading 6.59% lower than its 52-week high. eBay returned 52.8% in the last twelve months. SMA50 is 5.31%, and SMA200 is 6.72%. Debts are far from being a threat. This stock is a nice pick to go long. However, current price is slightly expensive.

Lincoln Electric Holdings (LECO): Lincoln Electric returned 22% in a year, and Cramer remains bullish on the stock, saying:

"I will always be a buyer of this one. The stock has come down. I think it is a mistake."

Lincoln Electric shows a trailing P/E ratio of 18.9, and a forward P/E ratio of 11.96, as of Aug 1. Analysts expect the company to have an 18.10% annual EPS growth in the next 5 years, which sounds overdone when its 1.08% EPS growth of past 5 years is considered. With a profit margin of 7.0%, Lincoln Electric pays a 1.82% dividend yield. Target price is $51.80, implying a 51.9% increase potential. Its O-Metrix score is 6.45, while the stock is currently trading 13.55% lower than its 52-week high. Earnings increased by 77.94% this quarter, and 168.26% this year. Debt-to assets ratio is slightly going down for the last five years. PEG value is 0.7. If the analysts’ estimates hold, Lincoln could be a sweet stock to go long.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.