Hedging Costs Doubled In Three Weeks
In an article three weeks ago ("Why You Should Consider Hedging If You Own Gold"), we noted that the costs of hedging a $100,000 position in gold against a greater-than-20% decline between then and March 16th, 2012, using optimal puts on the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (GLD) as a proxy for it, were $942, or about 0.95% of the position value. As of Monday, a slightly smaller position was worth about $113,000, and the costs of hedging it against the same percentage decline over the same time period, using optimal puts, was $2,340, or 2.07% of position value.
Below is a step-by-step example of finding those optimal puts. First a recap of why gold investors should consider hedging, and a reminder about optimal puts.
Why Gold Investors Should Consider Hedging
Earlier this month, the FT's Lex Column ("Gold: pinpointing the peak") noted a reason why gold might have some more room to run, but also a warning of why the peak may be near.
Room To Run?
Lex noted that despite its current, nominal highs, adjusted for inflation, gold is still 30% below its 1980 peak.
Despite the potential room for gold to run, Lex pointed raised this red flag:
One classic warning of a peak – a rush of what professionals call dumb money – is already evident. Look at iShares’ gold trust IAU, which holds 12m ounces. It has seen a disproportionate rise in small buyers: the number of accounts with fewer than 1,000 shares (100 ounces) has trebled in the past year while large ones have barely budged.
The rush for the exits, whenever it comes, will be lively.
Being Hedged Means Not Having To Rush For The Exits
If you own gold, and you're hedged, you can find out how much more room gold has to run, confident that your downside in the face of a major correction will be limited.
1980 vs. 2008
If you're hedged when the next correction in gold hits, you'll have the breathing room to consider whether that correction is analogous to 1980's crash from gold's generational peak or to 2008's sharp, though temporary, correction.
Remember that in 2008 gold fell to a low of $712.50 per ounce, after having peaked at over $1,011 per ounce earlier in the year. A gold investor who had been hedged could have, if he were still bullish on gold at that point, sold his hedges and used the proceeds to increase his position in gold.
A Step By Step Example Of Hedging With Optimal puts
Below we've demonstrated a way to hedge gold, using optimal puts on the SPDR Gold Trust ETF (GLD) as a proxy for it. First a quick reminder about what optimal puts means in this context.
About optimal puts
Optimal puts are the ones that will give you the level of protection you want at the lowest possible cost. As University of Maine finance professor Dr. Robert Strong, CFA has noted, picking the most economical puts can be a complicated task. With Portfolio Armor (available on the web and as an Apple iOS app), you just enter the symbol of the stock or ETF you're looking to hedge, the number of shares you own, and the maximum decline you're willing to risk (your threshold). Then the app uses an algorithm developed by a finance PhD to sort through and analyze all of the available puts for your position, scanning for the optimal ones.
Step 1: Enter a ticker symbol
In this case, we're using GLD as a proxy, so we've entered it in the "Ticker Symbol" field below:
Step 2: Enter a number of shares
In our previous article ("Why You Should Consider Hedging if You Own Gold"), we considered a hypotherical investor with $100k in physical gold or other gold assets. Since we were using GLD as a proxy, the number of shares we entered was $100,000 / the most recent share price of GLD ($161.49, as of the date of the article) = 619.23. We rounded that down to 619 and entered that number in the "Shares Owned" field. This time, we've entered a slightly smaller number in the shares owned field, 612. As of Monday's close 612 shares of GLD were worth approximately $113,000.
Step 3: Enter a decline threshold
You can enter any percentage you like for a threshold when using Portfolio Armor (the higher the percentage though, the greater the chance you will find optimal puts for your position). The idea for a 20% threshold comes, as I've mentioned before, from a comment fund manager John Hussman made in a market commentary in October 2008:
An intolerable loss, in my view, is one that requires a heroic recovery simply to break even … a short-term loss of 20%, particularly after the market has become severely depressed, should not be at all intolerable to long-term investors because such losses are generally reversed in the first few months of an advance (or even a powerful bear market rally).
Essentially, 20% is a large enough threshold that it reduces the cost of hedging but not so large that it precludes a recovery. So we've entered 20% in the Threshold field in the screen cap below.
Step 4: Tap the "Done" button
A moment after clicking the red button, you'd see the screen cap below, which shows the optimal put option contracts to buy to hedge 612 shares of GLD against a >20% drop between now and March 16, 2012. Two notes about these optimal put options and their cost:
- Portfolio Armor rounded down the number of shares of GLD we entered to the nearest hundred (since one put option contract represents the right to sell one hundred shares of the underlying security), and then presented us with 6 of the put option contracts that would slightly over-hedge the 600 shares of GLD they cover, so that the total value of the 612 shares of GLD would be protected against a greater-than-20% decline.
- To be conservative, Portfolio Armor calculated the cost based on the ask price of the optimal puts. In practice an investor can often purchase puts for a lower price, i.e., some price between the bid and the ask.
Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, but may initiate a short position in GLD over the next 72 hours.