Starbucks and Jamba Juice Sounds Like a Nice Combination 3 comments
March 22, 2007
| about: SBUX
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I think Starbucks (SBUX) should purchase Jamba Juice (JMBA). They could do so while Jamba (JMBA) remains cheap. I'm thinking out loud, but it could work well.
JMBA became a public company last year through the use of a special purpose acquisition corporation [SPAC] - essentially a shell company that issues shares to the public and later utilizes those funds to buy an operating company. The firm's growth trajectory has just begun, and Starbucks would then possess an entire portfolio of high profit margin beverages and healthy foods. JMBA and SBUX could also continue to exist as separate brands.
It makes a lot of sense to me, but I'm not sure that JMBA wants to sell. Several hedge funds are 5+% shareholders, including George Soros. We'll see what happens, but I'm covering all bases by owning both stock
Related Articles
|

























This article has 3 comments:
Jamba Juice is like a contra Starbucks in that the expected market potential for the concept has been shrinking while Starbucks has exceeded even the most wild eyed optimistic expectations for growth.
Though Starbucks jumped yesterday, it remains remarkably cheap by its historic standards. You might consider instead shorting JMBA and staying long Starbucks. Starbucks is not going to buy them ever.
Starbucks will be better off, buying jamba juice and keep its growth engine going.....
Mahesh Reddy
Okay, okay...the long SBUX part of my paired trade sucked a big one also just not as much as JMBA sucked.