LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) is the interest rate that fellow European banks will charge other banks. Put another way, it is the rate at which a financial institution in the region can borrow money.
In order for banks to operate, they are consistently lending out and/or borrowing. If they cannot exchange with one another, required reserve levels could be deemed “inadequate” or investors could sour on the health of the company. A bank that cannot get access to funds from any source could find itself being taken over by a respective government, perhaps to prevent widespread withdrawals that might cripple the entity.
Why am I bringing up LIBOR trends today, when S&P downgraded the sovereign debt of France? For one thing, in spite of the market’s gloom-n-doom reaction, the event is not a surprise. The agency gave a 45-day warning on 15 European nations on 12/5, and there has been very little in the way of actual debt-reducing, decision-making since that day.
More importantly, the biggest reason for addressing LIBOR is that the widely tracked “three-month” has been steadily easing for nearly a week ... six trading days to be precise.
Normally, this might not mean a whole lot. However, since 8/01/11, LIBOR (three-Month) has drifted lower on only one or two occasions. In fact, it journeyed from 0.255% on 8/01/11 all the way up to 0.582% by 1/5/12. As of 1/14/12, it has eased to 0.567%.
On its face, 0.582% and 0.567% may not seem like high annualized rates for a three-month period. However, LIBOR is typically a few tenths of a percentage point more than the Fed Funds overnight rate, currently at 0.00%-0.25%. It follows that anything above 0.45% represents something ominously familiar to the 2008 toxic mortgage credit crunch and subsequent market collapse.
I documented and discussed LIBOR trends throughout 2011. For example, in September’s Currency ETFs Forecast More Trouble In The Works, I wrote, “three-Month LIBOR rates climbed above a long-term moving average in mid-August ... and they just keep climbing. In fact, it is 40% more expensive for European banks to borrow from one another than it was on the 4th of July.” (Note: At 0.582% in the first week of January 2012, it hit 128% more expensive.)
Of course, if the six-day move of falling rates becomes a longer term trend, one may be able to set aside worries about the extension of credit coming to a standstill. Moreover, the shares of corporations in the financial sector around the world could see relief rallies.
I am not declaring myself bullish on financial companies. I still believe it is sensible to underweight developed world banks. That said, should the European credit crunch ease, I would be more eager to acquire Asian ETFs that have large financial weightings.
For the last six months, terrific economies with exceptionally solid financial institutions have been held hostage ... deemed guilty by association. Indeed, if the credit crunch in Europe continues easing, I’d have a lot more interest in Asia country funds like iShares MSCI Singapore (NYSEARCA:EWS) and iShares MSCI Malaysia (NYSEARCA:EWM).
Click to enlarge
Disclosure: Gary Gordon, MS, CFP is the president of Pacific Park Financial, Inc., a Registered Investment Adviser with the SEC. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial, Inc, and/or its clients may hold positions in the ETFs, mutual funds, and/or any investment asset mentioned above. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered herein are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial, Inc. or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert web site. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships.