Bad News from Seagate Technology Presents Opportunity in Western Digital 3 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
In the case of WDC, I believe that investor pessimism is an unwarranted overhang from the poor fortunes Seagate is having – both stocks are down about 15% year-to-date, but Western Digital looks to be a stronger company and better investment, as it has superior operating margins (8.5% and increasing to Seagate’s 4.7% and falling), better growth opportunities (plans to expand into the fastest growing segments of data storage, namely consumer electronics, with the current consensus five-year looking too low), and a more attractive valuation (WDC trades for 4.6x EV/EBITDA and 0.587x EV/Sales, with STX at 9.3x EV/EBITDA and 1.18x EV/S despite having lower margins on those sales).
Further, if the leaner business model run by Western Digital begins to challenge Seagate in additional areas of the market, Seagate’s margins will be hurt even more than they already have – something that Western Digital appears able to afford, but not Seagate. Finally, Western Digital also has a large cash reserve nearing $800 million, which will give it more flexibility than the debt-carrying Seagate to make acquisitions, increase R&D spending, or pursue other activities to enhance shareholder value.
Although I’m not a chart reader, I can’t ignore the intraday pattern given Monday, with WDC hitting a low right near the open and proceeding to tentatively work higher the rest of the day. This might not be the absolute bottom, but with a conservative fair value estimate of $21 on WDC, I believe the current price in the $16 range provides an excellent time to consider entering a position.
STX/WDC 1-yr comparison chart
Disclosure: none
Related Articles
|



























This article has 3 comments:
I think part of the valuation discount for WDC is certainly attributable to enthusiasm for flash memory stocks over HDD (Sandisk is at 10.7 EV/EBITDA, 3.1x EV/Sales on 16.9% operating margins); but the market is giving flash a premium right now that I think is irrational - flash might be the anchor of, say, cell phone data storage, but I simply don't see how it can compete against HDD on a scale of more than a few gigabytes. The primary problem with flash is that right now it is about 100x as expensive on a storage unit basis, and even about 5 years down the road the difference should still be double-digits. Then there is the problem of writelife, which is limited on flash drives and will likely prevent adoption in regular computers...
Seagate's CEO says that the average size of HDD shipped is increasing by 10% per quarter. Flash might be a nifty technology, but I don't think it will find widespread adoption for handling the huge data storage jobs the future will bring. Right now it looks like the market is pricing WDC as being dead, and I still think it has a lot of life left.