Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

NuStar Energy L.P. (NYSE:NS)

Q4 2011 Earnings Conference Call

January 27, 2012 10:00 ET

Executives

Chris Russell – Investor Relations

Curt Anastasio – President and Chief Executive Officer

Steve Blank – Chief Financial Officer

Analysts

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

Paul Jacobs – Raymond James

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

Selman Akyol – Stifel Nicolaus

Operator

Good morning. My name is (David) and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the NuStar Energy L.P. and NuStar GP Holdings LLC Fourth Quarter 2011 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Thank you.

I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Chris Russell. Sir, you may begin your conference.

Chris Russell – Investor Relations

Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone and welcome to our conference call to discuss NuStar Energy L.P. and NuStar GP Holdings LLC’s fourth quarter 2011 earnings results. With me today is Curt Anastasio, President and CEO of NuStar Energy L.P. and NuStar GP Holdings LLC; Steve Blank, our CFO; and other members of our management team.

Before we get started, we would like to remind you that during the course of this call, NuStar management will make statements about our current views concerning the future performance of NuStar that are forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to the various uncertainties and assumptions described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and will not be updated to confirm the actual results or revised expectations.

During the course of this call, we will also make reference to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Our non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as alternatives to GAAP measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to U.S. GAAP maybe found either in our earnings press release or on our website under the Investor Relations tab.

Now, let me turn the call over to Curt.

Curt Anastasio – President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, and thanks for joining us today. Although the U.S. and global economic conditions continue to be very challenging this past year and oil and gas volatility remained high. NuStar was able to generate more distributable cash flow, more EBITDA, and operating income in 2011 compared to 2010.

In addition, we continue to grow our asset base to internal growth capital projects and acquisitions, improve the condition of our balance sheet, continued to realize outstanding safety results, and we are named the 15th best company in America to work for by Fortune Magazine.

During the year, NuStar completed 16 internal growth projects with a total project cost of about $200 million. We expect these projects to generate EBITDA at a 5 to 6 times multiple and contribute to the results of all three of our business segments during 2012. The St. James, Louisiana Phase I terminal expansion and the reactivation of two pipelines in the Eagle Ford Shale with major internal growth projects completed during the past year. The St. James terminal expansion project increased the storage capacity of the terminal by 3.2 million barrels to 8.2 million barrels making that facility NuStar’s second largest storage terminal asset, second only to our St. Eustatius terminal located in the Caribbean.

Our two reactivated pipeline projects are currently transporting about 60,000 barrels a day of Eagle Ford Shale crude. Both of those projects should contribute to increased pipeline transportation segment EBITDA in 2012. We spent about $100 million for two acquisitions, which combined generated EBITDA at close to a six times multiple during 2011. We are implementing profit improvement initiatives at both acquisition locations that should allow us to improve the performance of those assets in 2012 and in future years.

Taking a look at NuStar’s 2011 financial performance, EBITDA of $490 million was higher than the $483 million earned in 2010 driven primarily by the record performance of our storage segment. Storage EBITDA of $281 million was $25 million higher than the $256 million earned in 2010. Increased storage rates on existing contracts, increased customer demand for storage services, a full year of EBITDA from the fourth quarter 2010 completion of our St. Eustatius terminal reconfiguration project as well as the completion of the St. James terminal expansion in the third quarter of this year, all contributed to the segment’s increased EBITDA.

Pipeline transportation segment EBITDA $197 million nearly matched the $199 million earned in 2010. Higher pipeline tariffs and additional revenue generated by the Eagle Ford Shale projects substantially offset a 9% reduction in pipeline throughputs.

Refined products pipeline throughputs were down about 3% for the year when compared to 2010. Turnaround activity at some of our customers’ refineries as well as market conditions that made it more favorable for some of our customers to export refined products, especially diesel then to transport them to Houston on our Corpus Christi to Houston pipeline adversely affected throughput. However, toward the end of the year volume on some of our refined product pipelines increased as we were able to obtain new volume throughput commitments.

Crude oil pipeline throughputs were down almost 18% in 2011. Turnarounds and operating issues at some customers’ refineries and the impact of competitive supply economics negatively impacted throughput on the crude system. But while crude throughputs were down compared to last year, they are on the upswing.

Crude throughputs increased in both the third and fourth quarters of 2011. They were higher in the fourth quarter of 2011 than any other quarter during the year and were only 2% lower than fourth quarter 2010. Incremental throughputs from the completion of our Eagle Ford Shale pipeline projects contributed to the increased throughputs in the last half of this year.

Our asphalt and fuels marketing segment EBITDA for 2011 was $108 million slightly lower than the $111 million earned in 2010. Fuels marketing operations 2011 EBITDA within that segment increased to $65 million, $28 million higher than the $37 million earned last year. Increased margins and sales volumes in our crude oil trading, heavy fuels and bunkering businesses contributed to the higher result. Our crude oil trading and heavy fuels marketing businesses benefited from the WTI to Brent spread that existed for the majority of 2011, while our bunkering business benefited from the growth into new markets during 2011.

Asphalt operations EBITDA of $28 million was lower than the $74 million earned in 2010. Continued weak U.S. demand for asphalt and reduced margins caused by lower cost asphalt supply entering the East Coast market from Midwest refiners who are also benefited from the WTI to Brent spread with the main reasons of the reduced EBITDA.

Our San Antonio refinery acquired in April of 2011 generated $15 million of EBITDA. Our decision at the time of the acquisition to hedge most of the margin proved beneficial as we booked a hedging gain of $16.4 million in the fourth quarter.

Corporate G&A expenses were down around $7 million in 2011 mainly due to reduced stock-based compensation expense. The reduced G&A expenses helped partially offset the fact that 2011 did not benefit from a $13.5 million insurance settlement that was recognized to other income in 2010 relating to hurricane Ike damage at our Texas City terminal in the third quarter of 2008.

During 2011 we entered into a couple of financing transactions to secure financing for future internal growth opportunities and to improve the condition of our balance sheet. In August, NuStar received $75 million of low interest rate tax-exempt Gulf opportunities on or GO Zone financing from the St. James Parish in the state of Louisiana. To-date, we have issued $365 million of bonds under the GO Zone program. These bonds were issued to fund the estimated construction costs associated with two storage tank expansion projects and two unit train offloading projects at our St. James terminal.

As of December 31, 2011, around $170 million of these bond proceeds had not yet been spent or being held in escrow with a trustee. The escrow funds should be spent by the middle of 2013. In December, we received $311 million in proceeds by issuing about $6 million common units of NuStar Energy. The proceeds were used to reduce outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our debt EBITDA ratio as of December 31, 2011 was 4.1 times.

Once again, 2011 was an outstanding year for NuStar's operations as we maintained our status as a leader in safety and environmental performance. We’ve finished the year with zero employee lost-time injuries, reduced our employee recordable injuries by 43% from 14 to 8, and reduced our total recordable incident rate by 50% from 0.69 to 0.35. We also reduced the number of recordable releases for the seventh consecutive year as well as reduced the volume of material release.

Last week, we learned the Fortune Magazine ranked NuStar 15th in their listing of the 100 best companies to work for in America that was the fourth consecutive year we've been so recognized by Fortune Magazine. And this year’s ranking is our highest yet 15 spots higher than last year's ranking and makes us the highest ranking energy company in the country.

Turning to our fourth quarter 2011 results, EBITDA for the quarter was $99 million less than the $114 million earned in the fourth quarter of 2010. However, storage and transportation segment results were both higher than the fourth quarter of 2010. Storage segment 2011 EBITDA increased $9 million when compared to last year's fourth quarter. Increased storage rates on existing contracts, continued increased customer demand for storage services and incremental EBITDA generated by the third quarter of 2011 completion of the Phase I storage expansion project at St. James contributed to the increased EBITDA.

Transportation segment fourth quarter 2011 EBITDA increased by about $1 million. Higher pipeline revenues as a result of the 6.9% July 1, 2011 tariff adjustment and additional revenue generated by the completed Eagle Ford shale project more than offset the impact of a slight 1% quarter-over-quarter reduction in throughput. The asphalt and fuels marketing segment generated negative EBITDA of $6 million in the fourth quarter that was $27 million lower than the $21 million of EBITDA generated in last year's fourth quarter and more than offset the improved results generated by storage and transportation.

Mainly because of weak asphalt margins caused by higher crude cost and continued soft demand. Our asphalt operations generated negative EBITDA of $27 million during the quarter. That compares to positive $6 million earned in the fourth quarter of 2010. Per-barrel gross margins decreased to $1.28 in the fourth quarter compared to fourth quarter 2010 gross margins of $6.70 per barrel. The $14 million of fourth quarter EBITDA in the fuels marketing operations was comparable to the $14 million earned in the fourth quarter 2010.

San Antonio refinery generated $7 million of EBITDA in the fourth quarter. Taking a look at fourth quarter of 2011 corporate expenses, G&A expenses were $34 million flat with last year. Interest expense for the quarter was $21 million, up $1 million from last year mainly due to increased borrowings under our revolver. With regard to our fourth quarter distribution, NuStar Energy’s Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter distribution of a $1.9 and a $0.5 per unit. The distribution will be paid on February 10 to holders of record as of February 7.

Distributable cash flow available to limited partners cover the distribution to the limited by 0.87 times for the fourth quarter of 2011 and 1.09 times for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Board of NuStar GP Holdings declared a fourth quarter distribution of $0.51 per unit, which is 0.015 per unit or 3% higher than the third quarter of 2011 distribution. Increased cash flows as a result of NuStar Energy issuing equity during the fourth quarter allowed NuStar GP Holdings to increase the fourth quarter distribution. The NuStar GP Holdings distribution will be paid on February 14. As we moved into 2012, we continue to work on previously announced Eagle Ford shale projects for several new potential projects in the Eagle Ford and other shale areas. A few of these projects should be completed and begin to generate EBITDA this year in 2012.

In addition, work continues on the crude oil offloading facility being constructed with EOG Resources at our St. James Louisiana terminal. The 70,000 barrel per day offloading facility should be in operation early next quarter. Work on a 1 million barrel distillate storage expansion project also continues at our St. Eustatius terminal. This expansion project should be completed and placed into service in the fourth quarter of this year.

With regard to earnings guidance for the first quarter of 2012, storage segment first quarter result should be higher than last year due mainly to the third quarter 2011 completion of the St. James Phase I storage expansion project. Our pipeline transportation segment results are expected to be comparable to last year's first quarter. And we expect the asphalt and fuels marketing segment first quarter result should be lower than the same quarter last year and slightly negative.

Even though, our San Antonio refinery and our fuels marketing operation should contribute positively, projected losses in asphalt should cause the total segment results to be slightly negative in the first quarter of the year. First quarter 2012 G&A expenses are expected to be in the range of $27 million to $28 million. Depreciation and amortization around $44 million to $45 million and interest expense $22 million to $23 million. For the full year 2012, we expect NuStar’s EBITDA to be higher than in 2011.

EBITDA in all three of our business segment is also expected to be higher than 2011. Reliability capital spending for 2012 should be in the range of $40 million to $50 million while strategic capital spending should be in the range of $350 million to $400 million. However, we feel additional strategic projects could well be identified during 2012. In closing, I’m pleased with many of our 2011 accomplishments and the fact that we were able to increase earnings in a tough economic climate. As NuStar completes additional internal projects, implements profit improvement initiatives, and as the economy continues to improve, we fully expect NuStar’s earnings to continue to grow.

But, this time allow me to turn it over to our operator. So, we can begin to open up the call to the Q&A session. Operator?

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) And your first question comes from the line of Brian Zarahn of Barclays Capital.

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

On 2012 guidance, can you give any additional color as to what you think the year-over-year bump will be?

Curt Anastasio

It’s only January and whatever we’re going to tell you on asphalt is likely very obviously. So, we’re going to wait to a little later in the year to we get more specific about it. We said all three business segments should be up and with regard to the pipeline and storage. We’ve got some major projects that are either going to be go or no go really different changes for us within the next couple of months. So within a month or two, we’re going to know much more about those and rather than put out numbers that could be – could substantially vary from what we expect to announce and hope to announce in the near future. We decided at this time around to wait until we get resolution on that.

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

And then on maintenance CapEx 2011 number was down year-over-year and then 2012 is going to be down from that, can you let us know what’s behind those declines.

Curt Anastasio

Reliability, most of that is in the cycle time of our tank and integrity program we’re doing most of our maintenance and repairs on smaller diameter tanks. But our integrity program on the pipeline remains the same pretty much unchanged from year-to-year.

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

Okay.

Curt Anastasio

Big difference.

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

Okay. Just in general, most of the industry is seeing rises year-over-year, but okay. Last question from me any additional thoughts on the Savannah refinery. How it’s going in terms of utilization 2012 or options for different crude slates?

Curt Anastasio

Well, yeah. With regard to the second one first on crude slates it’s part our profit optimization for the asphalt refining system, which of course includes Savannah refinery is to diversify our crude slate. We signed a term deal with Statoil to run more Brazilian crude Peregrino relatively heavy crude. And we’re going to run more Canadian asphalt crude as well in our plan. Starting with Paulsboro, we are currently averaging probably about 7,000 barrels a day already of Canadian crude. We hope to ramp that up over the next year or so to 30,000 barrels a day. Of course, we are still running base load of Venezuelan crude and we are adding into Peregrino.

So, I think first at Paulsboro we will be in a position to run more of those and then second we are looking projects at Savannah to diversify that crude slate as well. As you can tell from my comments about some of the adverse development in asphalt refining and marketing this year, part of what we ran into because of this WTI-Brent spread was relatively cheaper crude being available to Mid-Continent refiners, who are able to access East Coast competitive land in cost on asphalt and they had that advance some of them, who can also access cheaper Canadian crude and so we need to have more flexible system. As a result, we are doing both at Paulsboro and then under study at Savannah what I just mention. You want to comment any further Paul?

Paul Brattlof

I think flexibility is the key and that’s what we are creating in our system right.

Curt Anastasio

Utilization rates I said they probably be comparable to this year at this point. That could change. The market improves. We have the flexibility to ramp it up. We got a lot of spare capacity. So, based on the current outlook though I would say you could use utilization rates comparable to this year.

Brian Zarahn – Barclays Capital

Okay. Thanks Paul and Curt.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Jacobs of Raymond James.

Paul Jacobs – Raymond James

Good morning guys. I guess the first question is on the performance initiatives for the two acquisitions. You mentioned at the beginning of the call, I’m assuming that’s going to reduce the six times acquisition cost that you outlined is some of that related to the crude slates and then for the remainder. If so then for the remainder, can you quantify the breakdown and the possible timing on those benefits?

Curt Anastasio

Yeah, they are both for, what we’re talking about there of course is the San Antonio refinery and the Turkey acquisition. And the San Antonio refineries off to a pretty good start with $15 million of EBITDA this year. But now they were into the plan we see a lot of areas for improvement on every aspect more reliable operations, lower crude transportation cost into the plan, on that point we are building a new pipeline from a terminal we acquired about 12 miles from the plant. So, we can pipeline crude into the plant get more reparative, the more reliable operations and also lower our transportation costs, which are trucking related into the plant today. So, that’s an example of that and we are also taking some steps to improve the yield quality on the products and I’ve got guys here Paul, Rick maybe comment further. Just some of the nature of the things we’re doing on the profit improvements of the San Antonio refinery.

Unidentified Company Speaker

I think it’s you said it we’re reducing the transportation cost and finding markets that we can access more efficiently.

Unidentified Company Speaker

And fine-tuning the operations and getting better cuts in yields, higher quality, higher value yields out of the refining.

Curt Anastasio

With regard to Turkey it will be, we’re going to enhance our ability to blend products at the terminals such as gasoline blendstocks. That will make the terminal more attractive to wider range of customers and traders, who could then use it for that purpose. We also have the NATO pipeline. As you know Turkey is part of NATO of running right at the periphery of our property, our plan is to connect to that pipeline. So that customers can access NATO jet supply, military supply for the NATO Air Force Base that are in Turkey already.

And then the other things we can do to improve the operations, which is an ongoing thing. So, I mean I think these are all things that we can, we are not unhappy with the six-time multiple on acquisitions, which when you look at where the acquisitions are going for in the MLP sector right now, but I think we can take steps to improve that further maybe get it to five times in the next year or two.

Paul Jacobs – Raymond James

Okay, thank you for that color. Can you dive a bit deeper into the hedging gain $16.4 million that you realized and what’s the scale of the gain likely to be over the next few quarters if there is any?

Unidentified Company Speaker

Well, first I will explain to you what we did with regard to the hedge. And as you know we have put on hedges when we bought the acquisition and go ahead Paul.

Paul Brattlof

Well, we sold a little bit more gasoline hedges than we actually produced, so what we did is we removed those hedges and accounting rules require us to bring that forward.

Unidentified Company Speaker

So, that point that Paul just made relates to the production out in the plant was actually a little different from the hedges we had put on. So, he made that adjustment to reflect the physical production at the plant.

Paul Brattlof

And so that is a one-time gain?

Unidentified Company Speaker

Yeah, that’s a one-time thing, that’s not as if he is going to be able to do that this quarter or next quarter, that was a one-time thing.

Paul Jacobs – Raymond James

Okay, great. Thanks guys.

Unidentified Company Speaker

And then we just look at it going forward and see what we need to do next.

Paul Jacobs – Raymond James

Okay, thank you.

Operator

Your next question comes from the line of Kathleen King of Bank of America/Merrill Lynch.

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

First question, just on the crude oil trading at your fuels marketing segment, I know you talked about that being a source of upside in 2011 and also being able to, for example, rail crude from the Bakken to your St. James facility and capture some of those differentials. With WTI-Brent differential and other differentials having compressed, does your strategy there change and do you expect to see less upside there in 2012?

Curt Anastasio

Well, the first question is no, the strategy hasn’t changed. The spread is still healthy enough to support a very profitable arbitrage on that trade. So, we will continue to make money doing that. It may not be $26 anymore or $27, which was kind of a blow out level, but it’s still very, very healthy by historic terms that the 11 or so that it’s at currently. We do expect to make a little less in the crude oil trading in 2012 at least at this point than we did in 2011, but part of the reason that was so was because of the very widespread in 2011 and that spread coming in actually helps us in their asphalt refining and marketing operations, because as I mentioned, the relative cost advantage of big time refiners decreases as well. And then going forward, we just think on the unit train that’s going to add value to the terminal anyway even if we weren’t using it for the sort of Bakken related Gulf Coast trade. There are other uses for the trade whether it be ethanol – and we are sitting there in the middle of the largest U.S. refining complex. So, we think there is going to be a lot of activity at a hub location for long time. Danny Oliver might want to add something on?

Danny Oliver

Well, I think current spread of ‘10 or ‘11 is more than enough to incent those barrels to come down into St. James. So, I think it may affect the customer’s profitability, but I don’t think it will affect volumes at all.

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Okay, understood. And then going back to the San Antonio refinery, if you could just provide some color on where that refinery is running today as far as throughput and is it where you’d like it to be post the fire and all that? And then also just an update on the hedge profile there for 2012 and ‘13 and if you are looking to add additional hedges?

Curt Anastasio

The throughput, Rick?

Rick Bluntzer

Yeah, currently based from on the latest numbers we average about 11,000 barrels a day for the year and currently we are up to 13,500 to 14,000 barrels a day.

Curt Anastasio

And that’s kind of where we like to keep it as we go forward in 2012 that 13.5 Rick mentioned. Then the other thing was on the hedges?

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Yeah that’s right.

Curt Anastasio

The next question.

Rick Bluntzer

We don’t have any plans to put any additional hedges on until we can increase the production substantially. So, right now, we think we are where we need to be.

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

For 2012?

Rick Bluntzer

Yes.

Curt Anastasio

It kind of likes the way the crack is shaping up from here forward. We will see what happens, but…

Rick Bluntzer

Yeah, I mean as all these refinery closures are starting to firm up the crack you’ve had Petroplus file, you’ve had….

Curt Anastasio

And of course Sunoco, Conoco, and the trainer facility, all of this changes to marketplace and a way that makes us a little more bullish on the crack. So, we are not eager to jump into a lot of new hedging at this time in the cycle.

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Okay and what percentage of estimate throughput, are you hedge for '12 at this point?

Curt Anastasio

About 70%.

Kathleen King – Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Your next question is from the line of Michael Blum of Wells Fargo.

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

Hi, good morning everybody.

Curt Anastasio

Good morning

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

Just two quick questions for me backed on the WTI-Brent spread with that spread narrowing as we think about how they relate to the asphalt business. Is it fair to assume that effectively beneficial for you on the relative to what we've been experienced in the last six months?

Curt Anastasio

Yeah, that narrow spread and the widespread is one of the big things and hurt us in 2011 as it narrows that's a positive factor for asphalt.

Unidentified Company Speaker

Yes and I think as that narrows it makes some waterborne crudes more competitive and then as we build the flexibility to as that spread changes to be able to give it back and forth as what our ultimate goal is.

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

Okay. And then you didn't mentioned anything guidance about distribution growth for 2012 so I was just curious if there is any kind of even big picture thoughts you could share in terms of how you're thinking about that.

Unidentified Company Speaker

We budgeted one, how about that.

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

That’s a start.

Unidentified Company Speaker

That’s a start. But everything we're doing is compared to history in recent times compared to our longer term history we've had a lower distribution growth rate, when we used to have. So, our whole plan is to restore higher level of distribution growth. So, we think, we have a plan that the board approved in November to get us back there. Steve, do you want to comment?

Steve Blank

No, I mean, I just say, Michael, we spend a lot of money this year on construction projects nearly $300 million and we spent $100 million on acquisitions and Curt mentioned in his notes that we're going to spend another $350 million to $400 million on strategic.

It's all construction projects principally for pipelines and storage Eagle Ford and St. Eustatius most notably. So, that's going to come through. The good thing about those projects are at very low multiples and bad thing about them they take 18 months to 2 years to get the EBITDA on the door. So, we're confident that we're going to return to something more normal for us in terms of distribution growth.

Curt Anastasio

They are all fee based back by long term contracts. And I think as we go through this year you can get a lot more visibility in our company as to what’s coming along the lines of the project, Steve mentioned and some new ones I got alluded to earlier that we are going to know about in the next couple of months.

Michael Blum – Wells Fargo

Okay, great. Thank you for that.

Operator

Your next question is from the line of Selman Akyol of Stifel Nicolaus.

Selman Akyol – Stifel Nicolaus

Curt I just want to follow-up on your comments to the major projects you said you are going to have a little bit more information on response to Brian’s question earlier. You said major projects you have to-go or no-go later in the year. When we think about major projects typically I would think there will be something that would come on with more 2013-14 timeframe so in case they would be additive to 2012.

Curt Anastasio

Yeah, I think there could be pipeline projects that are additive shorter term than that yes, but we also have some bigger projects in both the pipeline and storage segments that would be more like 2013, 2014. But we are definitely working on things that make a difference in 2012 and that’s part of what I’m talking about it this.

Unidentified Company Speaker

And we will see benefit in 2012 from capital projects that were completed in 2011, so.

Curt Anastasio

Yes, I talked about those.

Selman Akyol – Stifel Nicolaus

Alright, thank you.

Operator

And there are no additional questions in queue at this time.

Chris Russell – Investor Relations

Okay. Thanks operator. I would like to thank everyone for joining us on the call today. If anybody has any questions, please call NuStar’s Investor Relations. Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: NuStar Energy's CEO Discusses Q4 2011 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

Check out Seeking Alpha’s new Earnings Center »

This Transcript
All Transcripts