Seeking Alpha
Medium-term horizon, research analyst, macro, oil & gas
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)

When interpreting labor statistics one should be very careful with Januaries. This is the month when major changes to the population estimates (including so called population controls, i.e. the distribution of population over age/sex/race) are introduced. Briefly, all corrections to the overall population and its components gathered during the previous year, or ten years after decennial censuses, are introduced in January as a step in the relevant times series by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Bureau explicitly explains this trick in its documents.

Figure 1 shows how big were these corrections in January 2012. We have displayed the first differences (annual increments) of several time series related to labor force. The population corrections (the updated population controls) are applied to the civilian population (16 years and over), CP. The level of labor force, LF, the employment, E, and the number of unemployed, UE, is recalculated accordingly as the portions of the CP measured in the household surveys, e.g. the rate of unemployment. The 2012 correction is the highest since 2003, when the 2000 census was inserted in the time series. The adjustments to the population estimates change these rates only slightly. For example, the unemployment rate does not change and the employment-population ration rose due to the adjustment to the population controls. In January 2012, the civilian non-institutional population rose by 1685000 including 1510000 due to the change in the population controls. This number is higher than in 2003, when the 2000 census was included in the CP estimates.

Another issue is the rate of unemployment. The population controls do not change this rate much. Figure 2 compares the rates as obtained with and without seasonal adjustment. The NSA rate for January is 8.8% due to peaks in this rate in January 2010 (10.6%) and 2011 (9.8%). The NSA rate will be also above the SA rate in February as well.

Figure 3 shows the number of unemployed. In January 2012, it increased by 849,000 in absolute values and decreased by 330,000 in seasonally adjusted representation. The absolute growth is partially related to the change in population estimates (controls) and partially to the seasonal adjustment.


(Click to enlarge)


(Click to enlarge)

Figure 1. The first differences of the civilian population (16 years and over), CP, the level of labor force, LF, the employment, E, and the number of unemployed, UE, time series. The 2012 correction is the highest since 2003, when the 2000 census was inserted in the time series.


(Click to enlarge)

Figure 2. The rate of unemployment, UER, as measured with seasonal adjustment, SA, and without seasonal adjustment, NSA. The NSA value for January is 8.8%.


(Click to enlarge)

Figure 3. The number of unemployed, UE, as measured with seasonal adjustment, SA, and without seasonal adjustment, NSA.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Source: Employment Situation: The Effect Of Population Controls And Seasonal Adjustment