Ultra-High-Def TV: Not Worth the Money?
If you don't understand the question, the answer definitely is “no.” But if you do know what we're talking about (and even if you don't) read on – the answer may surprise you.
First things first: 1080p refers to the maximum possible resolution in high-definition television.
A piece in the Los Angeles Times recently gave a good non-technical technical description of it: 1080p refers to an image that is made up of 1,080 lines of digital information. The "p" stands for progressive — a regimen that scans those lines all at once 60 times a second for a brighter image than with earlier scan technologies.
Until recently, only a handful of 1080p models were available, and they cost several thousand dollars more than the more common 720p sets (which, themselves are PDG, compared to old-fashioned cathode ray or even earlier generation flat screen TV's.
So, is it worth it? We'll take a bold stance and say no, or, not right now, at least.
First of all, no one is broadcasting in true 1080p resolution, according to numerous sources. That may change. Some experts figure that competition and lower technology costs, as well as consumer demand, will drive us toward 1080p resolution at some point. So, if you are going to hold on to your TV for a while – a decade - it might make sense. However, we can also cite experts who say the costs will never be competitive.
Movies being released in the competing Blu Ray and HD-DVD formats are at 1080p, so you can enjoy that super-crisp
On the other hand, your true ability to distinguish the difference between 720 and 1080 Hi-Def may be more limited than you think. At nine feet away from a TV screen, you will need at least a 46 inch display. For optimum viewing of the resolution you will need a 70-inch screen. Best prices for those start at $3,000.
With high-quality flat screens dropping below $1,000, that's a stiff premium for a slightly better picture.
Comments