Seeking Alpha

About this author:

Legg Mason Internet analyst Scott Devitt says that Amazon should acquire Blue Nile (ticker: NILE). Here's his argument, and why he's probably wrong:

...in a report, [Legg Mason analyst Scott] Devitt said that [Blue] Nile would be a perfect fit for Amazon.com (AMZN), which also sells diamonds. That lifted the stock from 32 to 35 in a day. It is now at 33. ``It's rare that we'd recommend an acquisition for Amazon,'' says Devitt, but Nile is a unique example of a logical buy for Amazon. Nile's business model is akin to Amazon's, which focuses on inefficient markets, he notes.

(via Business Week)

Quick comments:

  • "Amazon... which focuses on inefficient markets". Really? Books? Music? Tools and gardening? Apparel? Amazon blankets a large chunk of retail categories. How can they all be "inefficient" markets?
  • Blue Nile has presented itself to Wall Street as an inventory-less, just-in-time retailer and claims that characteristic gives it a strategic advantage over other jewelry retailers. But not holding inventory is common in the diamond business, and Blue Nile's competitive advantages are therefore limited to the standard benefits of any Internet retailer.
  • The competive environment for online jewelry sales is intense. Blue Nile sticks out largely because it is one of the few firms that investors in publicly-traded stocks know. But there are numerous others. Take a look at Shoppping.com's listing of diamond engagement ring online vendors, for example. Barriers to entry are actually low.
  • Amazon's emphasis - correctly - is in virtualizing its business by expanding third party sales and sources of inventory-less income. Purchasing another online retailer to strengthen its own direct sales would run counter to that strategy.

Related:

« Any opinions expressed on the Seeking Alpha sites are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SeekingAlpha or its management. »