Transportation costs – and can cost a lot. We all know this. We even feel it personally as we shell out that $40, $50, or dare we say $60 for a full tank at the corner service station. We also feel it in the cost of the things we buy – like food and consumer goods – and since Star Trek's transporter is a long way from being a reality, that stuff has got to get from the farm, mine or manufacturer somehow. For coal and iron ore it's by ship.

Recently, the cost of hiring that ship has been rising. And it's not only due to increased operating costs (think fuel). The large capesize ships can carry 175,000 tonne of coal or iron-ore, and China has been using them at record levels. Here's what happened: India, China's closest iron-ore exporter, introduced a new tax on iron-ore exports, leading China to look farther afield for cheaper supplies. These supplies have to be brought in by ship longer distances which has reduced the number of ships available for hire. Once again the laws of supply and demand spring into action and transportation costs rise. They've risen so much that industry officials say that “freight [is] almost expensive as the ore itself”.

It's not just coal and iron ore that are effected. With the tight supply of capesize ships, the mid-sized “panamax vessels” are experiencing an increase in demand and their prices have risen too. This trickle down effect could raise prices all down the line, bumping up everything from rice to soybeans. And with China being one of the largest importer of soybeans, we all know which way the ships are headed.

Once the ships get to where they're going, the goods have to be unloaded, which brings us to another problem. In some places in southern China, there simply aren't enough berths for the ships to dock. When the ship is finally able to dock, the railway and ground transportation infrastructure is insufficient and even more bottlenecks have to be navigated. All these things combine to delay off-loading and reloading of the ships, keeping the ships out of service for the rest of the world.

All of this supports higher commodity prices – great when you're investing in the commodity, not so great when you're shelling out more money for that edamame. It also points out once again that commodities are driven by far more than one factor. In this case, the neo-longshoreman, bad dock management, insufficient railway maintenance and short-sighted Indian protectionism are driving the price of, say, veggie burgers.

Go figure.

So, how do we get in on this? Ever thought of owning a boat? Don't want the headaches? There's always Frontline Ltd (FRO), Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX), Eagle Bulk Shipping (EGLE) and Euroseas Ltd. (ESEA). They are all in the business of shipping iron ore, coal and other dry commodities and have some of the higher dividend yields in the industry – or frankly any industry. In fact, Frontline Ltd. Reports a dividend yield over 19%. Of course, if you are a commodity investor, buying a high yield old-money shipping company stock is the equivalent of buying your teenager a “dependable” car: a great idea on paper, but really quite boring to those concerned. Still, it's something to consider.

The other factor to consider here is the continuing effect of the China/Commodity axis. With China, we have for the first time in history an extremely high growth market that's already fully industrialized. The factories, the manufacturing knowhow, the intellectual property, the training – these have been in place in China for decades. But now as growth is taking root internally, not just in exporting, the markets find themselves faces with what amounts to a bottomless buyer. It's easy to imagine a Ross Perot-like giant sucking sound coming from across the pacific, as China's appetite for raw goods gets stronger and stronger. The cost of getting these raw goods into the local market seems the limiting factor, not the capacity to use them.

The other little take away lesson from all this? Pay attention to this article from 2003 – those building blocks of humanity that we all like trade – coal, iron ore, soybeans, wheat, etc. -- they all are traveling this global economy in ships. As the article says, “People don't book freighters unless they have cargo to move.”

Hard Assets Investor

From HAI:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 4 comments:

  •  
    May 25 08:58 AM
    I think it's critical that one also consider the potential supply of ships, especially as it relates to China, which is beginning a big ship-building program. It may be a ways off, but markets have a good habit of discounting such future events. Check out this link to "China begins expanding its supertanker fleet": www.iht.com/articles/2...
  •  
    May 25 11:24 AM
    another favorite: GNK
  •  
    May 29 11:02 PM
    You are too late. Those of us that have been in the shipping stocks for the last four or more years know the fleet growth is outstripping the demand rapidly at this point. Look at the long term chart for WS spot rates, look at the FAA market (futures). Read the IV (www1.investorvillage.c...;pt=m)message board for FRO and get a good understanding of this industry. To quote one insider, working for a well-known shipping broker, "The valuations in the tanker stocks are astonishing, when the market is now, finally, on the cusp of the tonnage supply story manifesting itself, after passing through the 2002-inspired pause in deliveries in 2006. "

    There is no substitute for doing your own research.
  •  
    Apr 21 04:18 PM
    Dont't forget the role thee American dollar plays in the market's low dollar value + demand=increased prices across the board.
  • Long Ideas

  • Short Ideas

  • Cramer's Picks

SA Partners

Hedge Fund Jobs

Job Seekers:

  • Search jobs by category
  • Get job alerts by email or live feed
  • Apply online
See full list of jobs »

Employers

  • See all recruitment options
  • Get applications online or by email
Post a job »

Trading Center