Searching For Answers Corporation 5 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Looking at average daily queries growth (the average of how many searches are conducted on Answers.com), we see impressive numbers. Traffic has grown 88% when comparing Q1 of 2007 over Q1 of 2006.
Web publishers tend to use the RPM metric (Revenues per thousand web pages served) as a measure of success in monetization effort and Answers is making good strides: 35% growth in RPM this quarter versus first quarter 2006. Things are looking good. While RPM growth is strong, it’s clearly lagging query growth. I’d like to see this catch up.
And that’s the rub.
The interesting thing here though is that while Answers.com’s content model is very much Web 2.0, its revenue model isn’t. Ad sales models are built on old-school principles: buy low, sell high. Admittedly, Answers needs to ramp up its sales efforts and execute. Managing a sales team is good for the business but is definitely not sexy. It costs money to hire good talent and takes even more time to manage them efficiently.
I won’t even get into the reliance on Google for traffic and monetization efforts. Google has Answers by the proverbial short-hairs and perhaps may eventually take them out. Until then, I’m nervous that Google plays such a crucial role in bringing the eyeballs and then monetizing them.
I love Answers’ service. My kids and I use it for book reports, science experiments (my daughter wanted to put an iPod in Coca Cola), and just good research. From my perch, Answers is now a show-me stock dependent on the good graces of Google and the execution of a sales team.
ANSW 1-yr chart

Related Articles
|
























This article has 5 comments:
Clearly, RPM (Revenues per thousand pageviews) * M (Thousands of pages views) = Total Revs
All I was trying to say is that I wanted to see the delta in RPM more approximate the delta of the page view growth. It's clear that Answers.com (ANSW) has an execution problem and I'd like to see their RPM growth improve -- that's all.