Why Did Japanese NIRP Cause Such Surprise In The Currency Market, And Is It More Dangerous?

| About: CurrencyShares Japanese (FXY)

Summary

The Bank of Japan's announcement of NIRP sent shock waves through the currency markets.

The yen has strengthened on capital repatriation since the BoJ's move.

JGB 10-year yields turned negative this week.

Longer term, the yen will weaken.

At the end of January, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) shocked the financial markets by announcing that it would allow the Japanese interest rates to become negative for the first time. USDJPY reacted with an abrupt rise from 118 to 121, which was completely reversed as global stock markets declined. USDJPY is currently at 112.06 (11-02-2016). The three-year chart below shows the extent of the move:

Source: Big Charts

Here is an extract from the BOJ's announcement:

The Introduction of "Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing (QQE) with a Negative Interest Rate"

The Bank will apply a negative interest rate of minus 0.1 percent to current accounts that financial institutions hold at the Bank. It will cut the interest rate further into negative territory if judged as necessary.

The Bank will introduce a multiple-tier system which some central banks in Europe (e.g. the Swiss National Bank) have put in place. Specifically, it will adopt a three-tier system in which the outstanding balance of each financial institution's current account at the Bank will be divided into three tiers, to each of which a positive interest rate, a zero interest rate, or a negative interest rate will be applied, respectively.

"QQE with a Negative Interest Rate" is designed to enable the Bank to pursue additional monetary easing in terms of three dimensions, combining a negative interest rate with quantity and quality.

The Bank will lower the short end of the yield curve and will exert further downward pressure on interest rates across the entire yield curve through a combination of a negative interest rate and large-scale purchases of JGBs.

The Bank will achieve the price stability target of 2 percent at the earliest possible time by making full use of possible measures in terms of the three dimensions.

In answering to the title question, part of the surprise was due to BoJ Governor Kuroda-san's volte-face. Prior to his departure for Davos, he had ruled out the adoption of a negative interest rate policy (NIRP). Upon his return, the BoJ announced the NIRP "out of the blue".

I was also surprised that the BoJ not only had adopted NIRP, but also it had taken so long for it to "fall on its sword". After all, it has been struggling with deflation and low-bond yields for more than a decade and embarked on QQE ahead of its collaborators at the ECB, SNB, Riksbank and Danmarks Bank. The Economist - Negative Creep - makes some important observations:

Almost a quarter of the world's GDP now comes from countries with negative rates.

... Not so long ago it was widely thought that, if interest rates went below zero, banks and their depositors would simply switch to cash, which pays no interest but doesn't charge any either. Yet deposits in Europe, where rates have been negative for well over a year, have been stable. For commercial banks, a small interest charge on electronic deposits has proved to be bearable compared with the costs of safely storing stacks of cash-and not yet onerous enough to try to pass on to individual depositors.

That has resulted in an unavoidable squeeze on profits of banks, particularly in the euro area, where an interest rate of -0.3% applies to almost all commercial-bank reserves. (As in Switzerland and Denmark, Japan's central bank has shielded banks from the full effect by setting up a system of tiered interest rates, in which the negative rate applies only to new reserves.) If interest rates go deeper into negative territory, profit margins will be squeezed harder-even in places where central banks have tried to protect banks. And if banks are not profitable, they are less able to add to the capital buffers that let them operate safely.

Perhaps the answer lies in the transient influence NIRP had on the value of JPY. The yen had risen quite sharply amid repatriation of the risk assets during the first weeks of January, the BoJ's announcement stemmed the tide briefly, until the flood resumed. The move beyond Qualitative Easing - which provides "permanent" capital but does not make its presence felt to the same extent - should have caused the yen to recommence its secular decline. With the liquidation of asset flows dominating the foreign exchanges, the BoJ's action was like a straw in the wind. Negative rates may be instantly recognizable whilst the purchase of common stock is masked by the daily ebb and flow of the stock market, but when investors are exiting "pursued by the bears", central bankers need to act with greater resolution. In time, I expect the BoJ will adopt a more negative stance.

In the longer run, the NIRP will reduce the attractiveness of the yen, which brings me to the second question - is NIRP more or less damaging to the economy than the QQE which has gone before? I am assuming here, that QQE, like all the forms of quantitative easing to emanate from the coffers of the major central banks, is inherently damaging to the economy because these policies artificially lower the rate of interest, leading to malinvestment. This destroys the long-run demand by reducing the return on savings - especially important in a country where the population is rapidly aging. More pensioners with less income from their savings and more workers with inadequate pension provisions due to the low interest rates and more defined benefit pension funds are at risk of default due to the insufficient funding of their liabilities. An added twist to this sorry situation is the propensity for unprofitable businesses to continue to operate, inexorably dragging down productivity. These are just a few of the unintended consequences of engineering interest rates below their natural level.

Investment Opportunities

In the past, I have been bullish on the Nikkei on a currency-hedged basis. The five-year chart below shows the relative performance versus the Euro Stoxx 50 over the last five years:

Click to enlarge

Source: Yahoo Finance

Long Nikkei 225 hedged may still prove a positive strategy, although the uptrend appears to have failed in the near term, but I believe, in the long run, under the BoJ - "QQE with NIRP" regime - the best trade will be to short the yen. Again, the near-term trend is unfavourable - repatriating capital flows may be the driving force. When the capital flows subside, the "Emperor" will be seen to have "less than zero" clothes. The yen should run into resistance around 110 and again at 105 - keep your powder dry.

10-year JGB yields nudged into negative territory this week whilst the 40-year maturity has been up from 1.12% to 1.23% over the past seven sessions. That may not seem much of a return, but longer-dated maturities are likely to offer increasingly attractive carry potential as market participants attempt to establish the "limit of NIRP". JGB futures offer a reasonably clean way of participating in any upside whilst hedging the majority of your currency exposure in either direction. You may be late to the trade, however, as the eight-year monthly yield chart below reveals:

Click to enlarge

Source: Trading Economics

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.