Amazon Stock's Expensive Unless Free Cash Flow Doubles 3 comments
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Take a look...
Amazon.com's trailing twelve-month free cash flow, measured to the end of 3/2007:
- True Free Cash Flow [TFCF]: $521 million, exactly flat year-over-year
- Structural Free Cash Flow [SFCF]: $273 million, up more than 50% year-over-year, aided by tax rates
True free cash flow doesn't consider taxes. Structural free cash flow does, with a starting base of net income after taxes. It increased. But true free cash flow did not.
Now let's consider other moving parts to get a valuation to free cash flow, again compared year-over-year to the end of March:
- Diluted shares outstanding: 420 million, down 6 million due to Amazon's share buyback program, which so far has been an excellent investment
- Cash, investments & equivalents: $1.42 billion, still down 29%
- Long-term debt: $1.25 billion, flat
With these numbers and the $70 share price, we find that Amazon has an enterprise value, or EV, of over $29 billion. So, we have EV/FCF multiples of:
- EV/TFCF: 55.6
- EV/SFCF: 106
These multiples compare to average free cash flow prices in the low-20s for large-cap stocks today. eBay (EBAY) trades at 25 times true free cash flow and 31 times structural, less than half of Amazon's price in both cases.
These valuations suggest that Amazon is expensive unless free cash flow is going to double or much more the next year, which does not appear likely. The share price looks especially expensive when you consider Amazon's rock-bottom profit margins. So is today's price sustainable, let alone attractive for new buyers?
Today's price seems to offer limited upside potential the next few years against meaningful downside risk.
Disclosure: Author has a short position in AMZN
AMZN 1-yr chart:

Related Articles
|


























This article has 3 comments:
But does anyone see any real fundamental change in the story to support buying stock above $60? I have not been able to figure it out. I'm a major Amazon customer and love the company, think they get Web 2.0 and all that but the valuation relative to the current core business is difficult to fathom.