Crude Remains Strong Despite Inventory Build 3 comments
June 20, 2007
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Crude closed at $68.86 (August 2007) Wednesday -- down 68 cents -- and the new futures contract starts Thursday.

Since I have been ranting today -- I remain firmly convinced that:
- Energy is not only a matter of economics, but a matter of National Security;
- Subsidies for Oil and Ethanol need to be replaced with subsidies for Solar;
- CAFE standards need to be raised;
- Expedited processing for Nuclear Power plant permits should be issued
I own a V8 (automatic), a straight 6 (6 speed), and a 4 cylinder (5 speed) -- so I am the last person to preach we all need to shift to Vespas and biofuels. But it's pretty apparent to even a gas hog like me that we need to do something other than send billions of dollars to terrorist nations each and every single month.
Source: Pat Oliphant via Yahoo!
Related Articles
|



























This article has 3 comments:
Imagine instead a U.S. where every rooftop is covered with solar panels, and the job of the electric utility companies is to regulate the flow, and furnish "peak" power. Imagine all autos being electric hybrids, that in usual around town use would run on electricity, and only burn fuel for long trips. Converting the energy of the sun to do all this work (running our household appliances, moving our cars) would have major effects at cooling the planet, since the heat energy of the sun would be converted to kinetic energy.
So, as I said, Barry is right on target with the direction we should be going: solar.
Too bad our political "leaders" are, as usual, out in left field.
In any event, I think CAFE and subsidies are both unneccesary, since a gas and/or oil tax will spur consumers in the right direction, and it can be made to be revenue neutral by cutting income taxes.