The stocks of Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) were both down on Friday on an analyst downgrade, which is fine. The company’s price has certainly been bid up.

What continues to amaze me, though, is the lack of attention to the very obvious mispricing that exists between the company’s class A and class B shares. For one thing, oftentimes the B shares aren’t even mentioned, or reports will just make reference to “shares of Chipotle,” as if they are all the same. Something very interesting has been going on here but no one seems to care.

When Chipotle was spun off of McDonald's (MCD) last year in an IPO, it had only one class of publicly traded stock. McDonald's retained a majority interest in Chipotle, though, calling the shares it owned B shares and assigning ten times the voting power to them. Then, when McDonald’s sold its remaining interest in October (perhaps because it saw CMG as overvalued?) the B shares came to market.

The shares have the same economic value. That is, the B shares are identical to the A shares except for the fact that they have more voting rights. So, if anything, the B shares should trade at a small premium to the A shares. But they don’t. They have persistently traded at a 7% discount to the A shares. This is an example of investor irrationality. I read about it in various places after the phenomenon began, but it took a call to the company itself before I believed it.

Anomalies like this drive academicians nuts. How can this happen? Why aren’t arbitrageurs eliminating this discrepancy? The literature on behavioral finance contends that such anomalies can persist when there are “limits to arbitrage.” This explains why shares of 3Com (COMS) traded at a discount to shares of Palm (PALM), which it owned; this is my favorite Wall Street anomaly of all time. Know-something investors couldn’t get their hands on shares of the overvalued stock to short, so it kept getting pushed up.

But I don’t think this can explain the persistent mispricing in this case. Both classes of stock trade several hundred thousand shares per day, and I personally have been able to buy both classes – the As before the Bs were around. Then I was able to easily sell the As and buy the Bs. So there is no liquidity concern here, and even if there were, I would expect the A shares to be discounted as there are slightly fewer of them outstanding (and thus they are less liquid).

So can this discrepancy be arbitraged? The short answer is yes, but it has not been profitable yet. Since the phenomenon continues to persist, those who shorted the A shares and bought the Bs have not yet realized any gain. And if it takes long enough to correct the mispricing, they may never realize a gain.

I found it difficult to get historical price data for CMG.B because, again, everyone is focused on the A shares. It isn’t available on Yahoo, Google or even Ameritrade’s resources. I finally found a source for both classes on the Chipotle IR website, although I had to search for each day’s price independently. I then, painstakingly, charted the profit from an arbitrage of them by manually entering them into excel. And here it is, in all its glory:

I assume that I initiated the arbitrage trade on January 10, since this was around the time that I personally learned of the mispricing, by buying Class B shares at $52.40 and shorting Class A shares at $56.21 . The cost basis is the cost of the shares I bought, $52.40, so to date the arbitrage would have produced a gain of $2.00/$52.40, or 3.8%. If we assume the cost of shorting is 9% APR, or 4.5% over the six months we were short, then the interest on the short would completely wipe out the gain on the long. And this ignores the time value of money, the return on the market and, perhaps more importantly, the fact that a long position in either class of stock would have produced a great gain.

The analyst report that came out today also makes reference to the large short interest in CMG in the explanation of its downgrade. Couldn’t this simply be because of investors trying to arbitrage the difference?

Full Disclosure: I have no position in any stock mentioned in this post.

CMG, CMG.B 1-yr chart:

Andy Kern

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 6 comments:

  •  
    Jun 25 08:56 AM
    i heard that the A shares a less shortable? also the B shares have a much bigger float. Either way the CMG A shares/B shares have finally produced a $10 dip entry
    point for longs. Since the breakout from $70 might have 80 points in tradable upside,
    this is just the beginning?
  •  
    Jun 25 11:39 AM
    CMG B shares are on Yahoo Finance... use CMG-B for the symbol.
  •  
    Jun 25 02:59 PM
    cmg-b has a quote on yahoo, but not historical quotes
  •  
    Jun 25 07:38 PM
    thats very interesting. good post!

    but now that you've brought it too light, will it disappear completely?
  •  
    Jun 26 01:29 AM
    Hey, if I was Dave Letterman I would call these "stupid chart tricks":

    A and B charts side-by-side:
    stockcharts.com/charts...|B

    Chart of daily ratio of A to B:
    stockcharts.com/h-sc/u...;p=D&yr=0&...

    -- Jim
  •  
    Jun 26 11:53 AM
    could be that the B shares are trading at a discount due to liquidity risk
 
  • Long Ideas

  • Short Ideas

  • Cramer's Picks

SA Partners

Hedge Fund Jobs

Job Seekers:

  • Search jobs by category
  • Get job alerts by email or live feed
  • Apply online
See full list of jobs »

Employers

  • See all recruitment options
  • Get applications online or by email
Post a job »

Trading Center