Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) is the leader in the North American coatings (paint) industry. The company is the third-largest coatings corporation globally.
Click to enlarge
Source: Source: Sherwin-Williams Credit Suisse Presentation, slide 5
The company is not an overnight success. Sherwin-Williams was founded in 1866.
Sherwin-Williams' management has a long history of rewarding shareholders with rising dividend payments. The company has paid increasing dividends for 37 consecutive years. This makes Sherwin-Williams 1 of only 50 Dividend Aristocrats.
The company's stock currently has a 1.2% dividend yield. Despite its long corporate history Sherwin-Williams is still in growth mode.
This growth is reflected in the rise of Sherwin-Williams' stock price over the last several years:
Click to enlargeSource: Finviz
The company is realizing growth by consolidating the fragmented coatings industry.
Sherwin-Williams took a big step forward in consolidating the industry with its latest announcement…Sherwin-Williams is Acquiring Valspar
The image below compares the size (using enterprise value) of Valspar and Sherwin-Williams. Enterprise value for both businesses is post-acquisition announcement. This shows the impact the acquisition will have on Sherwin-Williams' business.
The acquisition of Valspar by Sherwin-Williams is more than a small "bolt on" deal. The acquisition will significantly bolster Sherwin-Williams' international operations and boost the company to become the largest coatings business in the world.Valspar Overview
Valspar had a market cap of ~$5.3 billion before the acquisition. Valspar has a long history of dividend increases (like Sherwin-Williams). The company has increased its dividend payments every year since 1992.
Valspar operates in 2 segments:
The Coatings segment generates 70% of the company's EBITDA in fiscal 2015. The Paints segment generated 30% of the company's EBITDA in the same year.
The image below further summarizes Valspar's business:
Click to enlarge
Source: Sherwin-Williams' Valspar Acquisition Presentation, slide 4
The acquisition of Valspar will vault Sherwin-Williams to the #1 position in the global coatings industry. The acquisition will very likely reach approval as it in no way creates a monopoly in the industry.
The acquisition will be especially impactful for Sherwin-Williams' international operations. The company's percentage of revenue generated internationally will increase substantially.
- 16% of company revenue generated internationally before acquisition
- 24% of company revenue generated internationally after acquisition
A large acquisition would not be complete without potential synergy talk. The Sherwin-Williams/Valspar deal is no exception.
Sherwin-Williams expects to realize $280 million in annual synergies by 2018. The company expects fully realized synergies to be around $320 million a year. Nearly 90% of synergy benefits will come from selling, general, and administrative expenses as well as from reductions in raw material costs.
The overall impact of the acquisition will be positive for Sherwin-Williams. The company believes the deal will be immediately accretive to earnings-per-share (not counting acquisition costs).
The deal makes strategic sense as it gives Sherwin-Williams' international operations a "jump start." The deal also increases the size and scale of Sherwin-Williams' operations, which will likely result in higher margins through greater economies of scale.Did Sherwin-Williams Overpay?
The coatings industry is cyclical. There are two primary factors that impact earnings for the coatings industry:
- The strength of the global economy (especially housing and construction)
- The price of oil
When the global economy is strong, the coatings industry tends to do well. Sherwin-Williams has compounded its earnings-per-share at 20% a year since the worst of the Great Recession in 2009.
But the company did see earnings-per-share decline 20% from 2007 to 2009 during the Great Recession. Sherwin-Williams remains profitable during recessions, but the company is far from recession-resistant. The same is true of much of the coatings industry.
Oil prices also effect profitability for the coatings industry. Oil is one of the primary input costs of most coatings. High oil prices reduce margins, while low oil prices increase margins. Ultra-low oil prices have been a powerful tailwind for Sherwin-Williams.
What does all of this mean for the Valspar acquisition?
It means Sherwin-Williams is buying Valspar when everything is going just right. As a result, the company is paying far more than it would if it waited to purchase Valspar during a recession or a period of high oil prices (or preferably, both).
With that said, Sherwin-William is purchasing Valspar for a price-to-earnings ratio of around 20. Sherwin-Williams itself trades for a price-to-earnings ratio of nearly 26.
The acquisition is timed well. It is also being done for a fairly reasonable price-to-earnings ratio. Sherwin-Williams is not drastically overpaying for Valspar.What Should Shareholders Do?
Shareholders of Sherwin-Williams should continue to hold this high-quality dividend growth stock. There's no reason to bail on Sherwin-Williams. The company will very likely be larger a decade from now than it is today. The company will very likely also continue to pay rising dividends.
Investors looking to get exposure to the coatings industry would likely be better served waiting to make a purchase until either (or both):
- Oil prices rise
- The United States housing and construction market slows significantly
These events will create a more favorable time to purchase shares of Sherwin-Williams. Sherwin-Williams currently does not rank particularly well using The 8 Rules of Dividend Investing due to its above-average price-to-earnings ratio and low dividend yield.
Valspar shareholders are likely dancing in the streets due to the large premium the company is being acquired for. They are the biggest benefactors of the announced deal.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.