Technology Sector Signal - Daily

| About: Technology Select (XLK)

Summary

Technology stocks are subject to bubbles.

VRM is a risk management strategy designed to control downside losses while allowing for upside gains.

VRM based on behavioral finance emotions of greed and fear.

Historical simulations illustrate its performance.

Risk management is important in the volatile technology sector.

The dotcom crash of 2000-2002 sent the Nasdaq Composite down 78% from peak to bottom. Sixteen years later, the Nasdaq still has not recovered all of its losses. This history illustrates the need for risk management v. buy-and-hold perhaps better than any other.

Vertical Risk Management

Modern portfolio theory (MPT) is a theory of finance that attempts to maximize portfolio expected returns for a given amount of risk. The Endowment Model of Investing (NYSEMKT:EMI) is built upon MPT and includes alternative assets.

MPT is inherently flawed and EMI results in high risks. The 2008-09 financial crisis demonstrated fundamental problems for investors using EMI: their portfolios were exposed to unexpectedly high risk, their risk exposures were much higher than they thought, their risk tolerances were much higher than they thought, their risk tolerances were lower than they had believed.

Given these issues, I created a risk management strategy, which I call Vertical Risk Management (VRM) because it alters the amount and direction of exposure to the market.

The primary objective of VRM is to manage the downside risk to keep losses within a tolerable range. The thesis is that the best investment is one in which an investor can maintain a strategy that attempts to capture the upside potential as long as the losses do not exceed a loss threshold.

In summary, my VRM model is based on the Feedback Model described in Nobel laureate Robert Shiller's paper, From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance, (see pages 91-96, with his feedback model described mathematically in the footnote on page 95). Essentially, he argues that the emotions of greed and fear drive market prices far too high on the upside, and much too low in downturns.

I developed and tested hypotheses to try to quantify conditions that might make investors feel greedy and fearful. And it turns out, the size of market gains and losses, combined with the speed, does a pretty good job in determining when to be long, when to be out, and when to get short. I added risk management algorithms to Shiller's Feedback Model for risk control purposes. Here is a link to a presentation I made about VRM.

I applied my VRM model to the Select Sector SPDR ETF, XLK. The largest holdings of XLK are as follows:

HOLDINGS AND WEIGHTINGS as of 07/21/2016. Holdings and weightings are subject to change.

Symbol

Company Name

Index Weight

Last

Change

%Change

Volume

52 Week Range

AAPL

Apple Inc.

12.58%

98.66

-0.77

-0.77%

28.21 M

89.47 - 127.09

MSFT

Microsoft Corp

10.13%

56.57

0.77

1.38%

31.90 M

39.72 - 56.85

FB

Facebook Inc A

6.44%

121

0.39

0.32%

18.32 M

72.00 - 135.60

T

AT&T Inc

6.05%

43.11

0.59

1.39%

30.67 M

30.97 - 43.89

GOOGL

Alphabet Inc A

5.12%

759.28

4.87

0.65%

1.05 M

593.09 - 810.35

GOOG

Alphabet Inc C

5.04%

742.74

4.11

0.56%

1.26 M

565.05 - 789.87

VZ

Verizon Communications Inc

4.31%

56.1

0.73

1.32%

10.97 M

38.06 - 56.95

INTC

Intel Corp

3.75%

34.66

0.39

1.14%

32.84 M

24.87 - 35.93

CSCO

Cisco Systems Inc

3.57%

30.71

0.13

0.43%

19.35 M

22.46 - 30.72

V

Visa Inc A

3.48%

79.91

1.12

1.42%

12.51 M

60.00 - 81.73

Click to enlarge

In order to properly develop quantitative strategies using historical data, the best practice is to select an "In-Sample" period to test hypotheses and an "Out-of-Sample" period to test the algorithm on data not used when testing hypotheses. In this case, I used 2000-2013 as the "In-Sample" period and 2014-June 2016 as the "Out-of-Sample" period.

"In-Sample" Results

The VRM strategy is a long/short strategy that aims to manage risk by actively adjusting position size and direction. The long/short positions produced by VRM are depicted below for the In-Sample period.

Click to enlarge

The total return of the Unhedged XLK during the "In-Sample" period was 4%, with a maximum drawdown from peak of 80%.

Click to enlarge

This compares to the total return from the VRM model of 348% with a maximum drawdown of 22%.

"Out-of-Sample" Results

The long/short positions produced by VRM are depicted below for the Out-of-Sample period.

Click to enlarge

The total return of the Unhedged XLK during the "Out-of-Sample" period was 27%, with a maximum drawdown from peak of 14%. This compares to the total return from the VRM model of +1% with a maximum drawdown of 14%.

Click to enlarge

The VRM strategy has underperformed the unhedged return because there have been no major price reversals during this period -- yet.

Conclusions

The VRM model demonstrates that to achieve a good return in the technology sector within a tolerable loss limit, an investor must be willing to reallocate positions from long-to-short. VRM is designed to risk-manage when it detects the start of a falling market which may result in a collapse based on the "fear" factor. Equally important, it repositions to a long position after it detects the "fear" regime is over.

Important SEC Disclosures

This material is provided for limited purposes. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. References to specific asset classes and financial markets are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendations or investment advice. The opinions expressed in this article represent the current, good-faith views of the author(s) at the time of publication. The views are provided for informational purposes only and are subject to change. This material does not take into account any investor's particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. Investors should consult a financial advisor for advice suited to their individual financial needs. The author cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data contained in the article. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained in this article are subject to change. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the author assumes no duty to update them. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. As with any investment, there is a potential for profit as well as the possibility of loss.

The information presented in this paper relates to the creation and testing of investment models and the use of back-tested performance data. Back-tested results are calculated by the retroactive application of a model constructed on the basis of historical data and based on assumptions integral to the model which may or may not be testable and are subject to losses. Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. Back-testing allows the security selection methodology to be adjusted until past returns are maximized. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.