Instagram Followers Of Certain Brands And Celebrities Surpasses Facebook And Twitter

| About: Facebook (FB)

Summary

While Facebook dominated in absolute reach and Twitter owned real time news, Instagram was becoming the go-to destination for savvy brands and celebrities.

In June 2016, we repeated the same survey. We were surprised at how much Instagram followers and engagement have skyrocketed among brands and celebrities.

Instagram seems to be cementing its position as the ideal platform for premium brand advertising.

James Wang, Analyst: Next Generation Internet

In May 2015, ARK did its first survey of user engagement with the three largest social platforms: Facebook (NASDAQ:FB), Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) and Instagram. We found that while Facebook dominated in absolute reach and Twitter owned real time news, Instagram was becoming the go-to destination for savvy brands and celebrities. In June of 2016, we repeated the same survey. While we expected similar trends, we were surprised at how much Instagram followers and engagement have skyrocketed among brands and celebrities. Instagram seems to be cementing its position as the ideal platform for premium brand advertising. Consequently, we think Instagram could capture a large share of premium print and TV advertising dollars as they migrate online.

Almost all major brands host official accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Users voluntarily "follow" these accounts to receive posts, pictures and videos. The number of followers is a good measure of the reach of a brand on a social platform.

In second quarter 2015, Instagram followers began to surpass Twitter and Facebook for certain brands online, as shown below. Instagram's monthly active users (MAUs) overtook Twitter's in 2015, so its share gain in that competition was not surprising. Click to enlarge

This year, however, for the first time Instagram followers have exceeded Facebook followers for a major brand - Nike (NYSE:NKE). This share shift is surprising because Instagram only has a quarter the number of MAUs. More surprising is the magnitude of the growth (as shown below): Instagram now has nearly two times the number of followers.

Click to enlarge

Nike wasn't alone in its surge among Instagram followers. Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) and H&M both added more Instagram followers during the last year than they did Facebook followers. Disney (NYSE:DIS) and Red Bull added similar numbers for both networks. Cumulatively, 10 major consumer brands added more followers on Instagram than on Facebook during the past 12 months despite a four-fold difference in user base.

Among celebrity accounts, Instagram's growth was even more dramatic. Instagram was the fastest growing account for eight out of 10 celebrities by a wide margin. As shown below, Justin Bieber, Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Selena Gomez and Ariana Grande added 30-45 million Instagram followers each.

Click to enlarge

All-in-all, celebrities added more followers on Instagram than on Facebook and Twitter combined during the last year.

Click to enlarge

Each social network appeals to a specific demographic for a specific reason. Instagram's disproportionate distribution power among brands and celebrities suggests that it is becoming a mobile-centric lifestyle magazine/channel-a new breed of Conde Nast/Cosmopolitan/MTV. Just like glossy lifestyle magazines, Instagram's advertising blends seamlessly into organic content, making it more attractive and engaging than obtrusive banners and web page takeovers.

Illustrated below is a typical Instagram feed, including advertising. Notice how the ads in images 3 and 4 blend in with user generated content. These native ads generate high click through rates-up to two times higher than Facebook according to Salesforce.com. As a result, Instagram ads command premium rates; $3-6 per thousand views on average, with video fetching $20-60 per thousand views. In comparison, ads on Facebook go for around $6 per thousand views and on broadcast TV, $24 per thousand views on average.

Typical Instagram Feed

Instagram has become an ideal platform to reach young and affluent audiences as they migrate from TV. TV viewership is heavily skewed toward older audiences, as shown below. In the US, TV viewing among 18-24 year olds has dropped by a third in the last four years according to Nielsen.

Click to enlarge

In contrast, more than half of Instagram's users are between 18 and 29 years old, and less than 5% are older than 65, as shown below.

Click to enlarge

With the generational shift in media consumption away from TV toward mobile devices, advertisers likely will shift their budgets toward digital platforms like Instagram, YouTube and Snapchat. Print will be the biggest loser, as shown below.

Click to enlarge

These days, Instagram is impacting lifestyle content dramatically. While a typical Condé Nast publication has circulation in the single millions, Instagram reaches over 400 million people monthly. As shown above, advertisers not only over-spend on print but they under-spend on mobile relative to consumer engagement. This presents a sizable opportunity for mobile centric apps like Facebook, Instagram (owned by Facebook) and Twitter. Instagram's combination of high production value, captive mobile audience and Facebook-backed measurement and targeting may be the solution that finally helps fill the $22 billion mobile opportunity.

ARK's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. For a list of all purchases and sales made by ARK for client accounts during the past year that could be considered by the SEC as recommendations, click here. It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list. For full disclosures, click here.

Disclaimer: ©2015, ARK Investment Management LLC. All content is original and has been researched and produced by ARK Investment Management LLC ("ARK") unless otherwise stated. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of ARK. All statements made regarding companies, securities or other financial information on this site or any sites or articles relating to ARK are strictly beliefs and points of view held by ARK and are subject to change without notice. Certain of the statements contained in ARK original content may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on ARK's current views and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Information contained in ARK content has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed. This content has been distributed for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security, strategy or investment product. Any reference to a particular company or security in ARK original content is not an endorsement by ARK of that company or security or a recommendation by ARK to buy, sell or hold any particular security. Investors should determine for themselves whether a particular service, strategy, product or security is suitable for their investment needs or should seek such professional advice for their particular situation. By visiting and/or otherwise using the ARK website in any way, you indicate that you understand and accept the terms of use as set forth on the website and agree to be bound by them. If you do not agree to the terms of use of the ARK website, please do no access the ARK website or any pages thereof.