Individual investors are intensely focused on the concept of risk. And why shouldn't they be? Finding an appropriate level of downside risk is paramount. However, too few give equal weight to the potential upside risk in their decisions. Permabears and doom-and-gloomers often watch from the sidelines as the market rallies beyond the fear of the day.
We've been able to enjoy such a rally in the wake of the election. As the uncertainty surrounding future government policy dissipates, investors have a broad range of new opportunities. This week, our models' picks give us an opportunity to explore both upside and downside risk.
To help us cut through the fog, we are joined by Blue Harbinger (aka Mark Hines).
What level of risk is right for you?
The Stock Exchange provides an expert-level debate on technical and fundamental analysis. (Important background is available here). Comments, dissent, and specific stock questions are welcome!
This Week - Is Athena late to the party?
It's an extremely common mistake for investors to chase a stock on a rally, then panic and sell at the first downturn. This "buy high, sell low" strategy is an obvious loser. Athena is our answer to everyone who wants to find a trend, enjoy the ride, and hop out near the peak. Let's see what she has on tap this week.
Athena: Drill, baby, drill! Continental Resources, Inc. (NYSE:CLR) was on a roll in November - though I couldn't say why. All I see is a solid upward trend and a spike in price to cap it off.
Blue Harbinger: Continental has some competitive advantages and challenges relative to other energy exploration companies, but its price still remains highly correlated with the price of oil. For example, Continental has competitive WTI breakeven prices of around only $30-35 per WTI barrel, and it was an early mover in the Bakken Shale (Williston Basin). However, it will take a long time to develop its huge acreage.
A: I hadn't factored in time for future development, but to me that sounds like potential for future growth.
BH: Two other things I know you didn't factor in - the incoming administration (of which you have no knowledge) and attempts by OPEC to reduce crude supply.
Regarding the incoming administration, it seems the regulatory balance may shift slightly towards pro-business, pro-profits and pro-growth, instead of pro-environment. That may work in Continental's favor, but the bigger factor remains oil supply/demand - something the new administration has very little control over.
Regarding the attempt of OPEC to reduce supply, would-be buyers may have already missed that boat. Oil shot up on Wednesday (11/30) as OPEC agreed to its first oil production limits in eight years. Oil, as measured by the US Oil ETF (NYSEARCA:USO), was up 8.65% on Wednesday, and Continental was up 22.88%. Caution is prudent with regard to initiating any new positions, because Continental will likely be very volatile in the near term.
A: Well that's all very interesting, but I'm only looking to CLR for the next couple weeks. Am I wrong to see upside here?
BH: We certainly won't see any concrete policy shifts in your time frame, but that may not matter. Sometimes, the appearance of a shift to market-friendliness can move a stock just as much.
I'm not looking for anything nearly as risky as Athena. Looking out a year or two down the road, I expect broad-based gains from the biotech sector (NASDAQ:IBB).
We're reaching the bottom of a year-long slip, and the market seems to be correcting its perception of what IBB has to offer.
BH: From a contrarian standpoint, biotechnology and pharmaceutical stocks are attractive. And ETF IBB is a decent way to play the space, because it provides diversified exposure at a decent price (the expense ratio is 0.47%).
F: Who's the contrarian here? It looks like the market is coming to terms with a drastic change in this sector. Could the recent election be having an impact here too?
BH: It makes sense to consider IBB with regard to the goals of the incoming administration and congress. Hillary Clinton caused several big drops in IBB over the last year simply by taking issue with the way drugs are priced. Now that her presidency seems off the table (at least for the next four years), and the threat of the House and Senate being flipped has been removed, the prospects for biotechnology and drug makers look better. IBB did pop (up nearly 10%) the day after the election, but it has given back nearly half of those gains.
If you are a long-term contrarian investor, it may make sense to consider some of the individual stocks within the ETF because you don't have to pay the 0.47% annual expense ratio. For example, the two largest holdings (Celgene (NASDAQ:CELG) and Biogen (NASDAQ:BIIB)) have only underperformed the broader market (as measured by the S&P 500) slightly over the last year. However, the third-largest holding, Gilead (NASDAQ:GILD), has dramatically underperformed. We don't own Gilead, but we wrote about its attractiveness at the end of May ("Gilead: A Trump Stock Worth Considering"), and its valuation has only become more attractive since then.
Fantasy football is going to be the death of me. I liked OBJ a few weeks back, but I didn't like the Giants' next few matchups. I left him on the bench. Naturally, he started playing his best games of the season. This on-again-off-again approach isn't working for me.
BH: Did you want to talk about stocks here or what?
O: Right - you gotta stick with what you know. I'm back on airlines and airline manufacturers. I liked 'em near the end of October, and I like 'em again now. Check out Boeing (NYSE:BA). This one looks like a winner through the end of December at the very least.
BH: Industrials in general (as measured by the Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (NYSEARCA:XLI)) have performed well since the election, and Boeing has performed well too. Industrials (like Boeing) tend to be cyclical, and the market seems to like the incoming administration's pro-growth message.
From a valuation standpoint, Boeing is not unreasonable considering its price-to-earnings ratio (both trailing twelve months and forward) is within the historical range.
O: Glad to see we agree (for once). Any reason to hold onto this one for a while longer?
BH: Boeing continues to spit off a lot of free cash flow that it has been using to reward shareholders with big share repurchases and healthy dividend payments. The dividend yield sits at 2.9%, which is above average compared to the S&P 500 and may be attractive to many income-focused investors, especially considering interest rates are low and rising (i.e., bonds don't offer a lot of yield, and their prices will decline as interest rates go up).
I spy brighter days for Under Armour (NYSE:UA). The recent sell-off here was overdone, and some recovery is expected. Since I'm familiar with profit-taking techniques like trailing stops, some recovery is all I need.
BH: It appears the sell-off was the result of management tempering long-term growth expectations. Under Armour has been growing like wildfire since 1996, but it's a big company now and it's much harder for it to keep growing at the same high rate.
H: There may be some long-term concerns, but I'm not terribly concerned with that. How does this position look in the fundamentals?
BH: From a valuation standpoint, the company is cheaper than it was, but it's still very expensive and the market still has very high expectations for future growth. For example, check out Under Armour compared to its rival, Nike (NYSE:NKE).
BH: The market can be very fickle when it comes to brands and fashion. Under Armour enjoys a lot of brand recognition and favorability now, but that can change quickly. Plus, it already doesn't enjoy the same profit margins as Nike.
H: Be that as it may, I'll again say I'm really only interested in the stock's modest recovery. Talk to me again in February and we'll see how this one worked out.
Background on the Stock Exchange
Each week, Felix and Oscar host a poker game for some of their friends. Since they are all traders, they love to discuss their best current ideas before the game starts. They like to call this their "Stock Exchange." (Check it out for more background.) Their methods are excellent, as you know if you have been following the series. Since the time frames and risk profiles differ, so do the stock ideas. You get to be a fly on the wall from my report. I am the only human present, and the only one using any fundamental analysis.
The result? Several expert ideas each week from traders and a brief comment on the fundamentals from the human investor. The models are named to make it easy to remember their trading personalities. Each week features a different expert or stock.
If you want an opinion about a specific stock or sector, even those we did not mention, just ask! Put questions in the comments. Address them to a specific expert if you wish. Each has a specialty. Who is your favorite? (You can choose me, although my feelings will not be hurt very much if you prefer one of the models.)
Our models' picks for this week were uncharacteristically risky - but that's not all they had in common. By and large, the gang picked big potential movers for their short-term potential. Fundamental analysis and broader market context raise questions, where technical pings see a big upside.
This is why it is important to consider your level of risk tolerance as a function of your objectives. For many long-term investors, these positions would have little to offer. For those with a trading mindset, there may be a tidy profit to make before the holidays.
Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Additional disclosure: Please pass this piece to Gary for review