Seeking Alpha
About this author:

The House of Representatives on Saturday approved billions of dollars in tax breaks and incentives for alternative energy and energy efficiency, while imposing $16B in taxes on big oil. They did not, however call on automakers to make vehicles more fuel-efficient; some such measures may be included in the final version of the bill. The legislation would repeal tax breaks given to oil companies and end tax breaks for fuel-guzzling SUVs. Massachusetts Democrat Rep. Ed Markey called it "an historic turn away from a fossil fuel agenda and toward a renewable energy agenda for America." Republicans, however, claimed the bills ignored the need to produce more domestic oil, natural gas and coal. Included in the bills was the requirement that investor-owned electric utilities generate at least 15% of their electricity from renewable sources such as wind or biofuels. That had been a hotly contested issue, with utilities and business interests arguing that it would raise electricity prices in areas that do not have abundant wind energy, while environmentalists claimed it would encourage investments in renewable fuels and help address global warming. The bill also calls for stricter energy efficiency standards for appliances and lighting and incentives for building more energy-efficient "green" buildings. They extend renewable energy production tax credits to 2012. The provisions will be merged with legislation passed by the Senate in June. The White House said it might veto the bill because it made "no serious attempts to increase our energy security or address high energy costs."

Sources: MarketWatch, Reuters, AP
Commentary: Book Review: A Thousand Barrels a SecondRising Crude Oil Is Driving the Dollar DownOil Demand to Overtake Supply by 2030 -- Report
Stocks/ETFs to watch: USO, OIL, PBW

Seeking Alpha's news briefs are combined into a pre-market summary called Wall Street Breakfast. Get Wall Street Breakfast by email -- it's free and takes only seconds to sign up.

Print this article with comments

This article has 38 comments:

  •  
    "The White House said it might veto the bill because it made "no serious attempts to increase our energy security or address high energy costs.""

    Translation: it doesn't reward his corrupt, pea-brained, worse-than-useless, evil, porcine, coal or oil buddies enough. Oink!
    2007 Aug 06 09:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    blah blah blah

    W is right...this bill will do nothing to increase our supply of energy. In fact, when you single out one industry for additional taxation (above the already excessive rates) there will be a predictable outcome...they will stop investing in the U.S. Instead, oil companies will spend their investment capital in other parts of the world and secure other countries' energy futures, putting ours at additional risk. The 1970's windfall profit tax was the same way...once it hit, oil companies started diverting money to other countries where the taxation policies weren't discriminatory and confiscatory.

    Thankfully, this bill will never see the light of day. Even if the Senate approves it, which I doubt, W will veto it. He really doesn't care what you think. He does what is right. That's what ticks you guys off.
    2007 Aug 06 09:39 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Private companies have fallen on their face. Government intervention is required here. Coal and oil companies should contemplate broadening their businesses to include wind, solar, nuclear instead of grumbling.
    2007 Aug 06 10:18 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    These companies are OIL and GAS companies. Why don't we suggest that GM and Ford start building bicycles? Its stupid. A key to being successful is to know what you do and do it best. oil and gas companies are wind/solar/nuclear companies. Their staff are not trained for these other industries. They are trained for the oil and gas industry. That industry will be around for a while, even as supplies go down and prices continue to rise.

    Why don't some of these big money guys start solar/nuclear/wind energy companies?? Buffett, that crook Soros, Michael Moore and John Edwards (snicker), etc. Bill GAtes? Why hasn't Gates invested his BILLIONS into wind/solar/nuclear?
    2007 Aug 07 09:06 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey what don't you guys get. We have 3% of the worlds oil reserves but consume 25% of the worlds oil. Its is like being on a desert island and having to weeks of food supplys left and then you throw a banquet. We are subsidizing super wealthy oil companies to continue to consume our remaining oil at an accelerated rate.

    Everyday the oil companies have huge numbers of missleading advertizing to defeat this bill.

    The faster we become oil independent the better we are able to compete in the world market



    Get over it folks there is a finite reserve of world oil.
    2007 Aug 06 05:50 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    If the government came out and said we will tax red cars 25% more than green and blue cars, owners of red cars would lobby their congressmen to overturn that action. Same thing with oil companies. Discriminatory taxes don't work and that's why they are fighting this. Haven't we learned that taxing an industry does not grow an industry? The 1970's windfall profits tax drove capital investment out of the US and into foreign countries. And that's just what this fool hearty move will do. Not enough oil/gas being produced in the US?? Why don't we over tax the only people investing money trying to find and produce more of it! That will get them to spend more and produce more!! The mindset of the left side of the aisle just cracks me up!
    2007 Aug 07 09:10 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    @MMMarkkk K, you are clearly taking things out of context and inserting inflammatory hyperbole. That said, you are right about taxes. Tax aversion is a full contact sport played by every man, woman, business, multi-national on the planet. Oil companies are no different. Over tax and they will complicate our lives -- an absolute fact...

    The point were your logic fails you is your clinging to the past and your lack of investment patterns of the Gates, Soros's and Buffets of the world. A perfect example is Gates investment in Ethanol. Soros invested $US 300MM in ethanol. Warren Buffet has a very large investment in wind energy. The Walton family (as in Wal-Mart) was one of the original investors in First Solar which just announced over $US 700MM in contracts. So they ARE investing, you need to come up to speed. Your analysis of energy production and security is akin to driving 70 MPH in your car while using your rear view mirror to see where you are going.
    2007 Aug 07 03:17 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Thanks for the update. I stand corrected on that point. However, I still don't understand why some "DEMAND" that oil and gas companies invest in alternative energy. Why must they? That's not their business. Their job is to find, produce, refine and sell oil, natural gas and gasoline and other assoicated products, then to return as much profit as legally possible to their shareholders. That's the business. Not to go off and invest in wind farms, cow farts, etc.
    2007 Aug 14 09:57 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    When is this expected to emerge as legislation?
    2007 Aug 10 01:18 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i know! we can band together and invade the oil companies and take all their pork! then we can beat up all the spare crawdads left over from the tiger hunt with left over pork scrapings. WHAT SAY YOU! HUH? HUH?

    WHO WILL JOIN ME!
    2008 Oct 05 09:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    wakka wakka i is pak man, hail me hailm me or i will give you flowers
    2008 Oct 05 09:38 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    DUUUUUUDE! LIKE>>>>DU...
    2008 Oct 05 09:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    blarg
    2008 Oct 05 09:39 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    face
    2008 Oct 05 09:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hnk
    2008 Oct 05 09:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hank the cowdog just stole my underpants.
    2008 Oct 05 09:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hey...are you gunna halp me harrass these piples or whut son?
    2008 Oct 05 09:40 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    yeah...huh...i'm the big dawg....watch out all ya'll pussy kats
    2008 Oct 05 09:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    where areth yooouu????????????????...
    2008 Oct 05 09:41 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    HI BUDDEH!
    2008 Oct 05 09:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    POOPPOOPPOOPPOOPPOOPPO...
    2008 Oct 05 09:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    up yours...
    2008 Oct 05 09:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    dude...lets talk like stoners
    2008 Oct 05 09:42 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hello????
    2008 Oct 05 09:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ohglksghkljdgsdfg
    2008 Oct 05 09:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i love poop
    2008 Oct 05 09:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    WHOOAAAA!!!! how do you blog with all those bugs crawling iinnn and oouutt of your mouth???
    2008 Oct 05 09:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    ARASAY??? WHERE ARE U?
    2008 Oct 05 09:43 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    look, i came here for a semi-logical blog. but hell with that. BRING AOOOWWWNNN TEH STUPIDDIDITYS!!!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    CAUSE IM MAGIC!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I"M HERE DUMBY!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    YOU"RE FACE IS GAY!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    poopmonkeys!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    INSULT!
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    GOOOOSSSHHHDARRRNNITTT...
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    i am having a conversation
    2008 Oct 05 09:44 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    hi
    2008 Oct 05 09:45 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!!!!!!...
    2008 Oct 05 09:45 PM | Link | Reply
More by SA Editor Susan Lerner
Other articles by SA Editor Susan Lerner »