VIX Call Options As Put Options 7 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
I didn’t wait for the 35 to 40 range to buy the puts as planned (see previous posts: July 23rd, May 8th) because they didn’t seem to be falling much in price during the downdraft, suggesting traders were beginning to price in a VIX peak. There might be even greater VIX spikes in weeks ahead but I can average down (or cut my losses, depending on the course of events).
The particular puts purchased were the Sept 20s at a price of $1.15. In hindsight, this may have been too aggressively out of the money. Anyway, it’ll be interesting to see what they do over the next few weeks. Hopefully, investors’ fears will have subsided enough by mid-September to give them a nice gain.
It was interesting to see the market rally in the last hour of trading on Friday. The previous three Fridays, there were sharp sell-offs in the last hour. Maybe that indicates the beginning of a shift in sentiment? But of course, it wouldn’t be surprising to see a few more subprime dominoes fall – but maybe the market won’t freak out as before given central banks are stepping up to the plate and injecting liquidity into the system.
Related Articles
|





















Why did you choose to buy (put) premia, when vola was high instead of selling (calls). I thought from your title you were talking about hedging with puts, but this is pure speculation. If you have a method to forcast volatilty at intervals as short as a month, i would love to hear about it. Going forward, i think people like Geoff Considine are thinking that 23-24 will become the norm.
Cheers from Tokyo,
john
The title is not mine. You're right: I'm not talking about hedging here. The forecast method? When the VIX shoots up quickly from a low number to 30 (near my entry point) or beyond, it doesn't usually stay there long (as far as I see from the historical pattern). The tactical error, as mentioned in the post, was buying too far out of the money. When VIX flirted with 30 on Friday, the Sept 27.5 puts might have been the better bet.
Peter Dunkley
Thanks for the clarification. The spike in implied is saving you a bit now that we are at 4 year highs, but your are still at a Delta of (close/weds) of -.13, what some would call a roughly 13% chance of success.
I understand the principle of mean reversion in volatitlity. That gives you the direction, but not the magnitude or time frame. In a sense, isn't that likelyhood of mean reversion paid for in with your option's vega? This is why i think it is better not to buy expensive premia.
Anyhow, I think we can both agree that circumstances are most unsual.
best wishes for you success,
john