The Federal Reserve unexpectedly cut its discount rate and said it's prepared to take further action to "mitigate'' damage to the economy from the rout in global credit markets.
The central bank reduced the rate at which it makes direct loans to banks by 0.5 percentage point to 5.75 percent. Policy makers kept their benchmark federal funds rate target unchanged at 5.25 percent. It's the first reduction in borrowing costs between scheduled meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee since 2001 and Ben S. Bernanke's first as Fed chairman.
The Fed also noted:
The Federal Reserve will continue to accept a broad range of collateral for discount window loans, including home mortgages and related assets.
These changes are designed to provide depositories with greater assurance about the cost and availability of funding.
This statement was in response to the fact that many banks are increasingly unwilling to let hedge funds and other institutional investors use credit portfolios as collateral for loans. However, it doesn’t address the fact that many banks are employing common sense by being wary of loans backed by debt securities, after scores of institutional investors lost billions due to improperly valuing debt securities and then borrowing against them.
The rate cut led to a wild ride for many beleaguered financial stocks, with many rocketing up in early morning training, prior to settling down by close, but still up for the day.
It appears, for now, that Wall St. may indeed get the Federal Reserve bailout it was praying for with the first round occurring today. If the Fed’s goal was to restore investor confidence, the early returns show that we’re headed in that direction (for now at least). Only time will tell if we’re able to turn the momentum from Thursday afternoon and Friday morning into a long-term rally.
My thoughts on the rate cut are as follows:
1) The biggest beneficiaries are going to be companies like Countrywide (CFC) and Thornburgh Mortgage (TMA); profitable on the bubble companies that were in danger of becoming victims of the credit crunch. For Countrywide in particular, the rate cut should give them the breathing room necessary to make the transition to funding their loans via Countrywide FSB and/or originating loans that can be sold to the Mortgage GSEs.
2) It doesn’t change much and in many ways, it’s just a placebo. Lower rates can’t truly raise investor confidence when investors worldwide are still losing money due to mortgage debt securities, loan defaults, and accelerating losses. In addition, hedge funds and other institutional investors are still over-leveraged on mortgage debt securities, etc.
3) Once the excitement dies down and bad news related to mortgage lenders, retail bank loan losses, and credit markets continues to pour in, we could see things reverse drastically.
4) We’re on a potentially dangerous sliding slope right now, because if the Fed decides to “fix” the credit crisis via multiple rate cuts. It’s basically sending the message that the Fed is going do what it can to create the level of confidence required to enable the credit markets to function as if it was 2004. The long-term consequences of this action would be rather disastrous as low rate cuts coupled with bad business practices are what got us into this situation.
The rate cut is here, but it still doesn’t change the real question “What is going to be done about the assumptions, lending standards, and business practices that created this mess in the first place?” There is a lot of talk and thought going into short-term solutions, but not enough into long-term solutions that would prevent a credit crunch from happening in the first place.