: Document Security Systems, Inc. (DMC) (market cap: $148.9M), has no significant assets besides a few patents and a lawsuit against the European Central Bank alleging copyright infringement for certain of the Euro bill's security features (such as water marks). In this report I briefly highlight the company's financial data and discuss the current state of DMC's court battles. I also criticize the one analyst who follows the company and who recently reiterated his buy recommendation.
DMC is a company without a decent product, without any significant assets (tangible or intangible), without any hope of ever making any sales significant enough to justify its current market cap. While the company has doubled its revenues over the last year ($1.75 million in Q1 2007, vs. $0.86 million in Q1 2006), about half of that increase has come ! from acquisitions ($215k from 2006 acquisition of P3) and from growth in the acquired companies (approximately $200k in sales growth in P3, see p.17 of the 10Q for details). Also, for an intellectual property company, Document Security Systems spends very little on R&D: $109k in the most recent quarter (see the August 9, 2007 press release). Net loss was $2.9 million in the most recent quarter (Q2, ended June 30). As for sales, they were up 10% in Q2 2007 versus Q2 2006. Not bad. But again, the company did make some acquisitions in that time. Oh, and share count was up 6% in the same period of time.
DMC's one asset is a patent (actually, a few related patents) on a document security system that prevents documents from being digitally scanned or copied. The one problem is that the patent was ruled invalid in the United States in 2000 and was ruled invalid in Britain and WIPO just this spring (the company has filed appeals). The company is of course appealing the recent rulings in Europe, but the case against them seems to me to be pretty strong. Also, if the company loses its appeals in Europe, it will not only have its patents invalidated but it will be liable for the court costs of the European Central Bank (which is trying to have the patents ruled invalid). The company did win an identical case in Germany, but it is unclear what would happen if the company won cases in some countries but not others. For a brief synopsis, I suggest reading Asensio.com's nc.&IsArchived=true">report (Asensio.com is an independent short-selling research outfit). I also suggest reading Asensio's prior reports on DMC. You can see DMC’s European patent online. I have uploaded a pdf copy of the patent here.
I came across an analyst that upgraded DMC to buy recently (see report). It turns out that the company that hired the analyst is being paid $30,000 per year to "to assist with strategies related to the increase of share liquidity and general market presence". That sounds a lot like "pump up the stock" to me. And while the analyst himself is independent, he would be a fool to bite the hand that feeds him, and he is no fool. CCM Opportunities, the research company that hired the analyst, has only 1 company with a rating of sell or avoid, and of the companies that it rates hold, only one is a microcap (others, like Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) and Archer Daniels Midland (NYSE:ADM) are megacaps). So in other words, if you pay CCM to get coverage for your microcap company, you can be pretty darn sure that you will get at least a "speculative buy" rating. Not bad for $30k.
DMC has a market cap of $148 million. It has net tangible assets of about $3 million. Because of its huge SG&A costs and resulting losses, the company’s fair value is $0. I suggest avoiding investing in DMC.
I am currently trying to get a copy of the German p! atent court decision and I am trying to get an opinion from an expert on European patent law regarding who needs to win where before money changes hands. I will post an update when I learn more.
Disclosure: I am short DMC. Short selling is very risky and I do not recommend it.
DMC 1-yr chart