• Font Size:
  • Print

A great ballsy, albeit expensive, move by Nokia (NOK) Monday, in buying Navteq (NVT). I am a huge bull on the prospects for mapping products in general and mobile location based services in general.

I don’t suppose many of Nokia's mapping competitors will be surprised. After all, it appears that a hush-hush kind of auction was conducted and that probably accounts for Nokia paying top euro - or to be more precise, €5.4bn euros. The real question is what are the current and future Nokia competitors going to do about it?

For data aggregators and enhancers like Webraska and Networks in Motion, who use the Navteq data to supply services across a range of handsets to mobile operators such as Orange UK and Verizon Wireless respectively, it is probably time to have a long hard look at strategy and decide whether they have the stomach and deep pockets for a new course of action.

For the poster boy of the standalone GPS device market, TomTom, who is already in the process of acquiring the only real competitor to Navteq, TeleAtlas, for the relatively cheap €1.8bn, there is definitely a gap appearing in the market for mobile manufacturers providing independent mapping software and services.

For the internet mapping giants, Google and Microsoft, they’ll probably have to go and collect their own data, "improve" on TeleAtlas and Navteq collection quality and contextual richness and then cut a deal directly with the mobile operators. Vodafone UK already has a deal for Google Maps.

The added complication is that the optimal business model is nowhere near being decided:

  • is the profit going to be from bundling the software in with the handset?
  • is the profit going to be charging for service or bundling the service in with access?
  • is the profit going to be from advertising? or
  • perm any of the above?

However, despite the uncertainties of the business model, I am absolutely sure that there is a huge latent demand: maps on the PC have taken off in the last couple of years and PC’s are not generally available when people really need directions. The beauty here is the timing, with the handset rapidly catching up with the specification of PC not only in terms of internet bandwidth, but also in raw processing power. Perhaps the pc-handset lag is currently only a mere 3 years.

Even better for Nokia is that they will actually own the mapping content and not have to deal with the crazy intermediaries of content, as with the other major OVI service already announced - music downloads.

Keith McMahon

About this author:
Become a Contributor Submit an Article

This article has 3 comments:

  •  
    Oct 02 07:22 AM
    I think I'd value Navteq at zero, with Google maps a reality. Garmin is another story. Since they make hardware, and and stand alone GPS's may have a few more years of life, they'd still be somewhat attractive. Look like NOK is in for dark days, sooner, rather than later. Their high end phone business about to implode and they spend 8 B on this nonsense?
  •  
    Oct 02 09:14 AM
    Navteq is one of the providers to Google Maps, so I don't think the distinction you make is clear.
  •  
    Oct 02 10:09 AM
    I stand corrected. In that case, I'd need to know more about their business model to evaluate the deal.

ETFs In Focus

  • Long Ideas

  • Short Ideas

  • Cramer's Picks