How I Voted My 2007 Diageo Shareholder Proxy
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Diageo PLC (DEO) has a staggered board which protects management and the board from being accountable to shareholders by only allowing a few board members to be elected each year. That way it takes a few years to change a shareholder unfriendly board. Usually, managements that are afraid of their shareholders do this.
As I do with all staggered boards, I voted against all three board members up for re-election this time. The three board members who are part of the staggered board up for election this year are: Ms. M Lilja, Mr. NC Rose, and Mr. PA Walker.
There are several other management sponsored resolutions about which I did not feel strongly except for one:
I
voted against a management sponsored resolution titled: "Authority to
make political donations". Quality companies focus on improving their
products and better marketing, not on begging government for handouts.
I don't want my company giving money out to corrupt politicians (in a
legal manner of course), i would rather they either send the money to
shareholders.
Sadly, Diageo has no shareholder sponsored resolutions.
Disclosure and Confessions: I own Diageo.
It has performed well for me but now trades at the upper end of it's PE
ratio and the ADR has gained greatly from drop in the U.S.. I am
considering it for a sale in the near future if the price rises any
more.
I am a fan of Diageo's products,
especially Guinness Stout and Harp Lager. If I must drink tequila, I
think their Don Julio brand is just about the best one you can drink.
I'm not much of a whiskey or other spirits drinker.
Some people
will not own shares in alcohol companies because they believe them to
be sin stocks. I do not believe this is the case for Alcohol
companies as I am an enthusiastic consumer.
Related Articles
|
























