Soon To Be Worthless: Nielsen Net Ratings and comScore Media Metrix
Reuters (RTRSY) is creating a new financial "blog ghetto." Its business model appears to be essentially a "Seeking Alpha" aggregation approach, with the added element of splitting advertising revenue with the analyst/authors. Over the summer, I was asked to participate in this. I wasn't interested in 30% of the revenue for 100% of my content.
Howard Lindzon notes some of the more onerous requirements of the Reuters contract at his blog. One item in particular grabbed my eye:
"You agree to sign the Letters of Agreement assigning all key syndicated traffic measurement firms, including but not limited to Nielsen Net Ratings and ComScore (SCOR) Media Metrix . . ." -Reuters blog revenue sharing contract
Over the past quarter, two other media outlets looking to share advertising revenue each asked for a similar clause:
"All traffic to your blog will then be assigned as traffic to ________."
This is intriguing: I have now seen this or similar demands from 3 separate mainstream media outlets: A wire service (Reuters), a financial magazine, and a major newspaper. In all three examples that I reviewed, the blog itself isn't transferred or sold to the media outlet (for examples, see Kevin Drum/Washington Monthly or Andrew Sullivan/The Atlantic).
Note that this is not only measure ads, but for all traffic: While I do understand they are trying to show the collective reach of the advertising, that is not how it is stated in the contract. "Blogger will assign ALL MEASURES OF WEB TRAFFIC" just seems wrong.
That is not what this about -- they are merely acting as an advertising agency, selling and placing ads, and then sharing the revenue. It would be one thing if they had a specific ownership relationship (purchase, employer etc.).
This is big business, with online advertising now $20 billion per year.
What does this clause actually mean -- to the new measuring metrics, to bloggers, and to the Media's push onto the web? Let's consider the ramifications:
1) This is nothing short of a naked grab to steal Blog traffic numbers, and artificially boost MSM web traffic numbers.
The print editions of newspapers and magazines have been seeing their circulation numbers ebb, while the web versions are significantly growing. However, trying to figure out how to "game" these traffic ratings is not exactly what competition in the market place is all about. Imagine if Baseball teams could buy wins, if TV shows could buy ratings, if CDs could buy sales.
There is a faint whiff of desperation to this.
2) Nielsen Net Ratings and comScore Media Metrix data are soon to be -- assuming they are not already -- worthless bull$h%t. If these ratings companies are complicit in this arrangement -- or if they even know and tolerate it -- their business model goes kaput. Since major MSMedia are attempting to buy ratings, these ratings will no longer accurately measure true traffic. I'm not saying its fraud, but it sure smells like bullshit.
What will occur instead is that Nielsen Net Ratings and comScore Media Metrix will actually be a measure of how many fools various publishers can get to sign documents assigning the bloggers' traffic to themselves.
Neat trick, but the data becomes meaningless.
3) This means that, very soon, web Advertisers will no longer be able to trust the data they get from publishers or these traffic rating agencies. Ad revenue rates are based on click-throughs and page-views. However, CPM rates are negotiated -- not measured. Hence, I assume is that this is for setting higher CPM rates (plus bragging rights).
4) I don't know the VCs behind the rating outfits, but I cannot believe the original pitch included anything like "And, our ratings can be easily traded and assigned, making them essentially worthless as a web metric."
I don't know if "Fraud" is too strong a word, but if I were them, I would be very, very pissed off. Why? I will bet you that the web traffic scores will soon be as informative and reliable as the S&P or Moody AAA ratings on sub-prime mortgage CDOs.
5) I have seen what is practically the identical proposal from several different, unrelated media firms.
This makes me think that the same brain trust is behind it -- some law firm/think tank/McKinsey-type group. Amusingly, it looks like the sleazy consultants/law firms sold it over and over to different media outlets.
If their advertising model lacks ethics, do you suppose these firms have any themselves? Lesson for the media: When you get into bed with these sleazoids, expect them to try to screw you over also!
To err is human, but it takes an MBA-laden consulting firm to create a true clusterf@#& . . . .
Sources:
U.S. Web Ad Spending Nears $10 Billion In First Half '07
Reuters
InformationWeek, October 4, 2007 03:00 PM
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202201206
A New Ratings System Stirs Up the Fall TV Season
BRIAN STELTER
NYT, October 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/08/business/media/08ratings.html
The Battle for the Consumer Online
RICHARD PÉREZ-PEÑA
NYT, October 8, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/08/business/media/08zuckerman.html
Extra! MSNBC.com buys Newsvine
Paul J. Gough
Hollywood Reporter, Sun Oct 7, 2007 11:52pm BST
http://uk.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUKN0727411220071008
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Apocalypse Dow: The Search for Scapegoats
- This Isn't a Bottom, It's a Disturbance in The Force
- Reading the S&P 500's Crashing Waves
- On a Return to Normalcy: Dow 8,500
- Looking Back at Lehman: Lying, Scapegoating and a General Lack of Accountability
- iShares ETF Tracking Error: Risks and Explanations
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Nation's Debt: It's Not Being Rescued, It's Being Moved Around »
- Clueless - Cramer's Mad Money (10/8/08) »
- Cramer Should Be Suspended »
- Crazy P/E Ratios »
- This Isn't a Bottom, It's a Disturbance in The Force »
- Sirius Shares Priced Like Stamps »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Earnings Preview: General Electric »
- Cramer: Dow Could Drop Another 14%, Oil's Going to $50 »
- 5 Reasons Stocks Will Keep Falling »
- Similarities to U.S. 1937, Japan 1998 »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- 'When There's Blood in the Streets', Buy Biotech Stocks
- Midstream MLPs Crashing, Present Opportunity
- A Fresh Look at Shipping Company Stocks
- Panic Selling in InterOil: What Now?
- Potash Corp.: No Liquidity Problems Here
- The Year of the Bear
- Cobalt: More Than Just Blue
- Investors Can Find Comfort in Big Blue
- Hershey: The Perfect Recession Investment?
- Applied Materials Leads by Example
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- The Short Case for General Electric
- Too Late to Short SPY? An Historical Perspective
- Henderson Group: Profit Warning Surprises Short Investors
- Decreasing Chipotle Traffic Could Spell Trouble
- Why I Sold Lowe's Short
- Accor, Host and Marriott: Short Interest Heats Up
- Global Financial Crisis Makes Oil a Great Hedge
- Michael Page International: Stock Down on Market Weakness
- Gaming Stocks Still a Poor Bet - Barron's
- After Coming Rate Cuts, Some Appealing Short ETFs
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Prefer a Yield - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/10/08)
- Bulls Take a Stand - Cramer's Stop Trading! (10/10/08)
- Clueless - Cramer's Mad Money (10/8/08)
- Torpedo Dry Ships - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/8/08)
- Chocolate Lover - Cramer's Mad Money (10/7/08)
- Yield is King - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/7/08)
- Goldman Disses Solar - Cramer's Stop Trading ! (10/7/08)
- Time to Hoard Cash - Cramer's Mad Money (10/6/08)
- Buyers On Strike - Cramer's Stop Trading! (10/6/08)
- Still Bullish on RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/6/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »




This article has 6 comments:
Sheilds
You agree to sign the Letters of Agreement assigning all key syndicated traffic measurement firms, including but not limited to Nielsen Net Ratings and ComScore (SCOR) Media Metrix . .
This isn't clear to me. Where and how do you just 'assign' metrics like this to these companies?
Hundreds of companies employ this practice of traffic assignment to other companies. However, it is important to note that ownership of these sites is in no way impacted nor does the traffic from these sites disappear. Instead, it allows them to be aggregated into a larger roll up that at the end of the day can hold more appeal for a prospective advertiser. The traffic from the individual sites can still be viewed as part of the roll-up assuming it is requested by the aggregator, and the traffic meets minimum sample and reporting standards. In many situations, traffic of assignment can actually benefit a site in terms of visibility within ratings reports and can allow it to further monetize its traffic without having to build up an expensive sales force on its own.
It is worthwhile to note that traffic of assignment has been within our industry for many years now and in fact has been incorporated into the proposed industry-wide IAB Nomenclature project that has the active involvement and support of leading players within the industry including publishers, advertisers and agencies. Our procedures for accepting traffic assignments are very rigorous. We require consent, a legitimate business purpose, and do not allow the traffic to be assigned multiple times. The latter requirement ensures that the audience represented in the ratings report is not double counted as a result of different publishers claiming assignment to the same site. With these safeguards in place, the notion that traffic is being stolen is simply not true. The fact that Mr. Ritholtz opted to not acquiesce with the three requests he was presented with during the summer validates the rules of full consent and non-duplication. If he did not consent, his traffic will not be credited to anyone but himself assuming his site is large enough to show up in the ratings report.
From a business and online ad sales perspective, it’s all about delivering audiences to advertisers that allow them to meet their goals and objectives. The aggregation of larger audiences with relevant content whether it is through 100% ownership or traffic assignment, is a legitimate way to make the audience more compelling to buy by marketers and advertisers. At the end of the day, this continues to be a business measured through dollars and cents. And through these practices, stronger online audiences can be created to drive more ad revenue and that is what will help to continue to make the online world go round.