Why The Fed Should Not Cut Interest Rates
As many of you know, the Federal Reserve may very well slash interest rates this week. With a weak dollar and oil nearing $100/bbl, many economic policy critics including Jim Rogers have said Bernanke should not be slashing the federal funds rate. Personally I have many problems with the Federal Reserve and have many of the same views as Rogers.
According to Rogers, it makes absolutely no sense for the Fed to lower the interest rate. With a rate cut, the dollar would tank even more and oil could easily top $100/bbl and inflation could potentially get out of control. Rogers also has argued that the United States may very well already be in recession. He said the housing and auto industries are already in conditions worse then a typical recession. Even big Dow Components such as Caterpillar (CAT), have said business hasn’t been this bad in fifty years.
Rogers also claims that while a lower dollar does mean higher exports and probably a cut in the trade deficit short term, it would hurt us in the mid/long term. Historically no country has ever been successful mid/long term devaluing their currency. There is nothing wrong with keeping interest rates steady, even if it means driving the United States into recession (assuming we aren’t already in one). It’s a normal part of the business cycle.
If you keep trying to bandage short term fixes, there will be many more negative long term effects. He also referred to Fort Knox, saying there gold would only be able to prop up the currency for maybe two days and our Treasury Reserve of 60 billion dollars would last about five seconds.
Who knows what will happen in the long term, but if we keep going down this road we will undoubtedly have high oil prices, a terrible currency, a potential run on the dollar, and even hyperinflation. By not lowering interest rates and giving into short term greed, we help reduce the risk of high interest rates further down the road.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Freddie/Fannie Plans In Motion; Why Are They Being Underplayed?
- Hedge Funds Are Getting Their Butts Kicked Too
- Energy Independence: It's About Demand, Not Supply
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- McCainomics: What Can He Do?
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Potash Corp. Update: Time To Buy? »
- Apple: Steve and I Have Been Wrong »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- The Chinese Oil Problem »
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings »
- Gold Futures' Dirty Secret (Part II) »
- Wells Fargo Sham Revealed »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Global Equities Falling Through Support
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Fannie & Freddie Bailout? - Fast Money Recap (9/5/08)
- Unconventional Energy Still Attractive - UBS
- Red Hat / Qumranet Deal Adds Fuel to the Virtualization Fire
- ETF Pick of the Week: iShares MSCI Netherlands
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 7 comments:
Wow, so this is perfect reason for Fed to lower the interest rate !!!
Wow, so this is perfect reason for Fed to lower the interest rate !!!
We SLASHED interest rates dramatically and quickly during the "Nasdaq/tech bubble-bursting period" and did NOT experience runaway inflation along with a "dramatic devaluing" of the dollar during that 3 1/4 year period...AND we are supposed to believe that a reduction in our trade imbalance and an increase in American jobs and overseas sales (exports!) is a bad thing?!?!?
Yes, home prices are down...but not lower than they were a few years ago...lower than they were during the last 1-3 years of the "Real Estate Bubble" (direct correlation to the Tech Bubble phenomenon?)...but for those who bought homes 5-10 years ago, they are still sitting on a significant increase in real estate values. Lesson to be learned...buying a home to live in...long term...and it can be a good investment...trying to "daytrade" a home...you can get burnt just like you can with the stock market.
The fed should and will lower rates....for a short period of time...allow people and lenders a chance to get out of some bad loans, etc...give "investors" a chance to pick up some "bargains" and wash out the excess inventory in the system (Which will help "level off" the home prices) and once the housing market has stabilized...then the fed will look to raise the funds rate again. We raised rates too fast (because Greenspan wanted a specific "equilibrium"... rate to retire at) ...and now we are correcting the "too high" scenario.