Comparing Bubbles: China vs. Nasdaq and Homebuilders 6 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
On Monday we compared the rises and crashes of the Nasdaq and the Homebuilders during their respective bubbles. A Bespoke reader asked if we could overlay the current rise in China's Shanghai Composite on the chart to see where its bull run currently stands in comparison.
The Nasdaq and Homebuilders rallied for around 2,000 calendar days, while the Shanghai has currently only been in rally mode for 560 days. However, the gains in China of 488% are fast approaching the max gains that the Nasdaq saw of 639% at its peak.
The most interesting data points here are the starting dates of the bubbles. The Homebuilders began their enormous rise on March 14, 2000, just four days after the Nasdaq peaked. Interestingly, the Shanghai started its meteoric rise on July 11, 2005 -- just nine days before the Homebuilders peaked. Investors have seemingly flocked from one bubble to the next.
Related Articles
|






















The Shanghai Index "A" share index started Dec 19, 1990 with a base of 100. It's a cap weighted index.
History lesson:
In 17 years, Shanghai has gone from 100 to 6000 - 60X
In 19 years, Japan went from 2000 to 39000 - 19.5X
In 20 years, the Nasdaq Comp went from 250 to 5000 - 20X
In 10 years, gold went from 35 to 850 - 24X
Note that gold only traded over 20X for a few days.
An even longer term perspective.. the South Sea Bubble was only a 10X move.
The history lesson is that once you hit 20X, it's over. Except for China. I would expect the price payed to be even more extreme than any of the other bubbles.
Long term charts here: www.chartsrus.com
www.diyeconomist.com/w.../
1. China IS a bubble
2. Bubbles will eventually stop, but can "remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent",
and 3. If China wants to crash, Q1-Q2 2008 is the most likely date.
Again log-periodicity is just an academic theory, but nevertheless it is interesting.
Looking for a trading pair that may help.