Seeking Alpha
We cover over 5K calls/quarter
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

Republic Services, Inc. (NYSE:RSG)

Q3 2007 Earnings Call

November 6, 2007 8:30 am ET

Executives

Jim O'Connor - Chairman and CEO

Tod Holmes - CFO

Analysts

Jagdeep Ghuman - Credit Suisse

Scott Levine - JP Morgan

Bill Fisher - Raymond James

Corey Greendale - First Analysis

Jonathan Ellis - Merrill Lynch

Leone Young - Citigroup

Marshall Reid - Banc of America

Brian Butler - FBR

Operator

Good morning and welcome to the Third Quarter Conference Call for Investors in Republic Services. Republic is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RSG. Your host this morning is Republic Chairman and CEO, Jim O'Connor. Today's call is being recorded and all participants are in a listen-only mode. There will be a question-and-answer session following Republic's summary of quarterly earnings. I will provide you with specific instructions for questions later in the call.

At this time, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. O'Connor. Good morning, Mr. O'Connor.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning Dennis, and thank you. Good morning and thank you for joining us. This is Jim O'Connor and I would like to welcome everyone to Republic Services' third quarter conference call. This morning, Tod Holmes, our Chief Financial Officer, and Ed Lang, our Treasurer, are joining me as we discuss our third quarter performance.

I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that some of the information that we will discuss with you today contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties and may be materially different from actual results. Our SEC filings discuss factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Additionally, the material that we discuss today is time sensitive. If in the future, you listen to a rebroadcast or a recording of this conference call, you should be sensitive to the date of the original call, which is November 6, 2007. Please note that this call is the property of Republic Services, Incorporated, any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call in any form without the expressed written consent of Republic Services is strictly prohibited.

During the third quarter, we continued to deliver on pricing initiatives and margin improvement. Our performance exceeded our original expectations and we have increased earnings guidance twice this year. We believe the current pricing environment is sustainable and the key results for the quarter were; Republic's revenue grew 2.4% to $806 million. We achieved internal growth of 2.9% with 4.9% of price improvement and negative 2% volume growth.

Our third quarter volume growth comparison was impacted by a slow-down in the residential housing construction activity and lower landfill volumes. Price growth continues to be strong. Core price is up 4%. Price is the most important factor driving increased margins and increased return on invested capital.

Within our landfill business, our core price was up approximately 3.2% in the quarter. We continue to see sequential improvement in landfill pricing.

As landfill and residential collection contracts renew, we are seeing consistent price increases and a high level of retention. The biggest impact on volume growth was in our temporary roll-off business. Residential construction volumes decreased approximately 12%, which is similar to the first half year performance.

In addition, residential construction related to C&D and special waste volumes, we are down at our rentals. We are still experiencing low single-digit growth in our commercial construction and permanent roll-off volumes. Despite the net volume reductions, temporary roll-off pricing has remained stable.

Operating margins, excluding environmental remediation costs, improved 310 basis points to 20%. This is the first time our margins have been at this level since the fourth quarter of 2000. We are focused on all components of our cost structure to ensure we remain competitive in our marketplace.

Republic had a number of significant achievements in the quarter. Our free cash flow for the second quarter was $60 million. During the quarter, we continued to return cash to our shareholders. In the third quarter, we repurchased 4.2 million shares of stock for $127 million.

Republic has approximately $207 million remaining under the existing authorization for share repurchase as of September 30th. Since the inception of our share repurchase program in July 2000, we have repurchased approximately $2.1 billion of Republic stock, or 40% of our outstanding shares.

During the third quarter, we extended two existing South Florida franchise agreements for up to five years at higher pricing. We continue to utilize our return on investment pricing tool on all renewals of franchises and municipal contracts.

And at this time, now I'd like to turn the call over to Tod Holmes for our financial review of the third quarter.

Tod Holmes

Thank you, Jim. I'll begin my review of the company's financial results by discussing third quarter revenue.

As Jim indicated, the third quarter revenues rose 2.4% to $806 million from $787 million last year, with internal growth of 2.9%. Total price was 4.9% with 4% coming from core price, a decrease of 10 basis points or one-tenth of 1% from fuel surcharges, and an increase from environmental fees of one-tenth of 1%, and an increase from commodities of nine-tenths of 1%.

During the quarter, we continued to benefit from our ongoing price increase strategy in all lines of business. We have been successful in 2007, securing price increases to provide adequate returns on our substantial investment, and we believe that this trend will continue in the fourth quarter and also throughout 2008.

Our total volume declined 2%. Core volume was down 1.9%, and non-core volume was down one-tenth of 1%. Divestitures accounted for the remaining five-tenths of 1% reduction in our revenue.

Third quarter year-over-year margin: Year-over-year operating margins decreased by 100 basis points from 16.9% to 15.9%. However, during the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $32.9 million or 410 basis points related to an increase in cost to remediate landfills in Ohio and California. The charge increased cost of operations by 390 basis points and DD&A by 20 basis points. Excluding this charge, the year-over-year operating margins increased by 310 basis points from 16.9% to 20%.

The key components of our year-over-year margin increase, excluding the landfill charge, are as follows. Truck maintenance, positive 10 basis points; health and risk insurance, a negative 50 basis points; fuel, a positive 10 basis points; landfill operating costs, a positive 50 basis points; disposal and subcontracting costs, positive 160 basis points; labor, a positive 40 basis points; DD&A, a positive 30 basis points; and SG&A, a positive 60 basis points for a total improvement of 310 basis points.

Now let me briefly comment on the components of these year-over-year margin change. First: Truck Maintenance during the third quarter of 2007 continued focus on cost saving initiatives, coupled with improved pricing resulted in a modest reduction in truck maintenance expense.

Second, Risk and Health Insurance: Insurance expense during the third quarter of 2007 was 5.6% of revenues, which was higher in the third quarter of 2006 due primarily to higher medical cost. We continue to believe that risk and health insurance cost, as a percentage of revenue, will be in a range of approximately 5.6% to 6%.

Third, Fuel: Our average wholesale price per gallon decreased from $2.80 in the third quarter of '06, to $2.76 in the third quarter of '07. Current fuel prices, however, are approximately $3.16 per gallon. So we will have a little fourth quarter headwind from fuel.

Fourth, Landfill Operating Expenses: During the third quarter, we benefited from lower year-over-year landfill operating cost due to lower C&D volumes and improved pricing. Also during the third quarter of 2006, we were beginning to see some higher cost at our County-wide facility.

The fifth is disposal and subcontracting cost. Again this is our largest cost category for which the impact of improved pricing is clearly visible. Also dry weather, particularly in the southeast, helped to lower disposal cost by about 40 basis points.

Sixth, Labor Cost: During the third quarter we continue to benefit from modest improvements which, coupled with improved pricing, contributed to our margin growth.

Seventh, DD&A: The decrease in DD&A as a percentage of revenue is due to higher year-over-year revenue and improved pricing.

And finally SG&A. Third quarter SG&A was 9.5% of revenues. This decrease in SG&A is due to lower incentive compensation expense, which is about 50 basis points. We believe that SG&A as a percentage of revenue will be approximately 10% for fiscal 2007.

Looking ahead, as Jim had indicated earlier, we believe that margin expansion for fiscal 2007 should be in the range of a 180 basis points to a 190 basis points.

Now let's turn our attention to the third quarter operating income before depreciation, amortization, depletion and accretion.

Excluding the landfill remediation charges, the year-over-year operating income before DD&A, increased by $28 million, an increase of 13.1% from $214 million, or 27.2% in the third quarter of '06 to $242 million or 30% margin in the third quarter of 2007. The last time we achieved 30% EBITDA margins was in the fourth quarter of 2000.

Next, I'll discuss free cash flow. Free cash flow for the third quarter of 2007 was $60 million. This is based on cash provided by operating activities of a $127 million less purchases of property and equipment of $69 million, plus the proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of $2 million. And that yields the $60 million of free cash flow.

Our free cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $259 million. This is based upon cash provided by operating activities of $470 million, plus purchases of property and equipment of $216 million, plus proceeds from the sale of property of $5 million yielding $259 million of free cash flow.

For the nine-months ended September 30th, 2007 the company actually took delivery of $184 million of capital. The statement of cash flow shows purchases of property and equipment of $216 million. This difference represents property and equipment that the company received during 2006, what was paid for during 2007. Hence, there is a slight difference between what you see on the statement of cash flows and what you see or will see in our 10-Q in the detail for MD&A on the equipment.

This reclassification on the statement of cash flow is from cash provided by operating activities to the purchases of property and equipment. So, free cash flow does not change. We believe the free cash flow for 2007 will be in the range of $320 million to $325 million, which again, was our increased guidance that we gave in July of 2007.

Items impacting cash balances, during the third quarter of 2007, we purchased $4.2 million shares of our common stock for approximately $127 million or $30.30 a share. Actual share account at September 30th, 2007 was $187.1 million shares.

Republic's balance sheet remains very strong. At September 30th, our accounts receivable balance was $320 million and our day-sales outstanding were 36 days. Net debt is $1.525 billion, which is up modestly from $1.430 billion at December 31st, 2006 and our net debt-to-total capital at September 30th, 2007 is 54%.

Now, I will turn the call back over to Jim O'Connor.

Jim O'Connor

Thank you, Tod. As you know, we have taken charges twice this year related to environmental remediation cost. At our Countywide facility in Ohio, Republic is in compliance with the Findings and Orders set by the Ohio EPA. In addition, we are in full compliance with existing permits and licenses issued to operate the facility today. Our Countywide facility has experienced higher leachate disposal costs as well as a modification to the site design to isolate the area experiencing a reaction that generates high temperatures. We have seen settlement, leachate volume and heat subsiding in this area of the landfill. But not as quickly as we saw in laboratory work on the materials disposed off at the facility which we had forecasted earlier.

Our internal and external landfill engineers have concluded a thorough analysis of the future remediation requirements and reviewed this information with local officials. We believe the additional reserve that we have booked will cover all future costs. We expect this process to continue for the next 12 to 18 months.

In California, the accrual is related to higher leachate cost that will occur until a new onsite treatment facility is operational in 2009. There will be no further accruals related to this site.

From a cash flow perspective, approximately $21 million of the $55 million in landfill charges will be spent in 2007. We will spend approximately $18 million in 2008 and the remaining $16 million will be spent in 2009 and after. Republic has reported earnings per share for the third quarter was $0.35, excluding environmental remediation cost, EPS was $0.46, which is an 18% improvement versus the third quarter of 2006.

Our updated EPS guidance for the full year is $1.65 to $1.66, a 19% improvement versus the full year 2006, excluding the remediation charges recognized this year. We are on track to deliver 180 to 190 basis points of margin improvement to operating margins. This is consistent with our original guidance and demonstrates the impact of improved pricing on margins and returns.

Previously discussed our 2007 business objectives are centered on improving margins by achieving appropriate price increases to offset inflationary costs and business risks, improving our market position, standardizing significant business processes and rationalizing our cost structure. I'd like to thank all the employees of Republic Services for their dedication and hard work which has resulted in another strong performance.

Operator, at this time, I'd like to open the line for questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions). Thank you. Our first question comes from Jagdeep Ghuman with Credit Suisse. You may ask your question.

Jagdeep Ghuman - Credit Suisse

Good morning.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning.

Jagdeep Ghuman - Credit Suisse

Just wondering, could you touch upon on the fuel recovery side, what percent of your revenue base has some sort of fuel recovery cost built-in in terms of contracts?

Tod Holmes

Outside of our municipal contracts and franchise, we got about -- and this is approximately about 60% of our revenue we have discretion over. Now, some of that 60%, obviously, we have some contracts signed that wouldn't allow us necessarily to pass it through, but it's a small percentage. So of that portion of our revenue, we have a high penetration of fuel surcharge recovery, I'd say probably somewhere around 90%.

Jagdeep Ghuman - Credit Suisse

Okay. And within the municipal and the franchise side, it's basically built-in via CPI escalator?

Tod Holmes

The majority of them are built into the index that adjusts the price in the contracts. We do have and have been successful over the last year, year and a half, in amending some of our franchise agreements for fuel surcharge pass-throughs.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Scott Levine with JP Morgan. You may ask your question.

Scott Levine - JP Morgan

Good morning.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning, Scott

Scott Levine - JP Morgan

Regarding the quarter, could you comment on what the volume environment roundup is looking like as the quarter progress? Were things fairly even moving through the quarter into October, or was there any appreciable change?

Jim O'Connor

No. I think year-over-year we're still seeing the same sorts of impacts from the residential construction business. We're seeing temporary volumes of anywhere from 10% to 15%. I think, in the third quarter comp probably, we're seeing probably the largest impact resulting from our Florida operations, where we've seen significant impacts on the construction business. But again, all reported within that 10% to 15% drop, but the majority of it is being experienced in Florida.

C&D volumes at landfills are down a comparable percentage on a year-over-year basis. Third quarter, we're down about 12% or so. But again, we've not seen anything. So I guess when we look at it, we'd say that the economy is still pretty resilient on our other lines of business and we're experiencing growth. And sequentially, quarter-to-quarter, on C&D landfill volumes in our landfills, we're seeing it to be relatively flat.

Scott Levine - JP Morgan

Okay, one follow-up on landfill pricing. Sounds like you're encouraged by what you're seeing there as well. I was wondering if you could comment a little bit more in detail regarding some of the markets you flagged as focal areas in the Midwest, perhaps in a more competitive urban markets you mentioned in the last call?

Jim O'Connor

Yeah. We still haven't seen much movement in the Canadian waste pricing. I mean when we look at pricing in Toronto, the independent transfer stations in Toronto have a huge spread over transportation and disposal into the US. And we have been trying to eat away at some of that because, again, these are risk assets and there is a lack of volume in Canada for these kinds of waste.

So we haven't seen much price movement there. We've been trying to move it up in this quarter. We have got a little bit of resistance. The other market was in our Eastern Kentucky operations, predominantly in Louisville, and we have to see much landfill pricing movement in that particular market.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Bill Fisher with Raymond James. You may ask your question.

Bill Fisher - Raymond James

Hi. Good morning

Jim O'Connor

Good morning, Bill

Bill Fisher - Raymond James

Jim, I'm just following up on landfill volumes. As you look out the next few quarters or so on a year-over-year basis, do you start hitting easier comps from the C&D side, do you anniversary some of the moves, I think, you made on special waste, or just what are some of the moving parts there, basically does that become less of a drag?

Jim O'Connor

Yeah. I think it will become less of a drag as we get into '08, I mean, obviously, unless the economy takes another downturn. But we're starting to see it flattened out, and maybe even see some modification into the fourth quarter of this year, or some lowering of that in the fourth quarter. But I think, yes, we'll see the comps getting better next year.

Bill Fisher - Raymond James

Okay. And just a follow-up for Tod actually, can you give a sense of where the growth or new cap spending will be on '07, and basically if volumes stay soft, do you see CapEx being the same or lower in '08, or how do we kind of think about that?

Tod Holmes

We're not going to comment on '08. We're in the process of putting together our 2008 business plan. But I would say that our 2007 capital spending is similar to what we said in our July call, which is in that range of about $295 million to $300 million.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Corey Greendale with First Analysis. You may ask your question.

Corey Greendale - First Analysis

Hi. Good morning.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning, Corey.

Corey Greendale - First Analysis

A question for Tod, I was hoping you could elaborate a little more on what helped SG&A in the quarter and whether the dollar amount is a good run rate to use going forward?

Tod Holmes

Yeah. Again, in our notes, I think we talked about a 10% run rate on a go-forward basis. Obviously, when we took this charge, it had an impact on incentive compensations for the company. So there's probably about 50 to 60 basis points of impact in SG&A as a result of the reduction in the accrual for incentive compensation.

Corey Greendale - First Analysis

Okay. And Jim, on the uses of cash side, you've already done more repurchases than at least I have been expecting for the year. Can you just talk a little bit about maybe first of all would you still be more on Q4 potentially, and second of all any meaningful change in kind of the thoughts about the uses of cash?

Jim O'Connor

Well, we are going to go into the market on an opportunistic basis. Basically a query, we accelerated the purchasing as well as the Section 16 officers bought stock when the market got pressure in early August, and the stock dropped into the $28 to $29 range. So we are going continue to be opportunistic in our approach to buying, and Tod and Ed Lang meet or converse every morning to determine what our position is in the market today. So we completed every share repurchase and we've got through '08 to do that, so we are going to continue to look at the market and again buy accordingly.

Tod Holmes

I think the broader question of what do we do with the cash in terms of the cash strategy, it's essentially unchanged from what we had articulated and what the Board had directed us towards in July, which was, share repurchase continues to be the corner stone for cash distribution strategy, although we'd obviously move the dividend up. So we continue to believe that in today's market that these stock prices given the margin expansion that we have seen and the opportunity we believe in the sector, the share repurchase should capture substantial value for our shareholders.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jonathan Ellis with Merrill Lynch may ask question.

Jonathan Ellis - Merrill Lynch

Thank you. Good morning guys.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning Jonathan.

Tod Holmes

Good morning.

Jonathan Ellis - Merrill Lynch

Just want to talk about overall pricing. I think last quarter you had talked about expectations for a 4.5% core price growth for full year 2007. Wondered if you could talk a little bit about your expectations now and if that's changed at all with the factors on the deviation?

Tod Holmes

I think may be that we weren't clear Jonathan. I thought that 4.5% was total, but what we are seeing in price is very consistent with what we have seen in prior quarters. And again our view, I think as we’ve always articulated and as we are seeing, is to try to move pricing out somewhere around 100 basis points above CPI, and we are able to do a little bit more than that currently and of course we have a little bit of benefit from commodities stepping up this year in the total price at least.

But I would say that certainly that 4% range is and the core price is achievable.

Jim O'Connor

Yeah. I think right now we are literally experiencing that the CPI got 2.8%, so we are 120 basis points above that on the core business. And I think it's evident in what we've earlier said that we can expand margins and we are expanding margins absent the charge of 180 basis points to 190 basis points and are still on the track to do that.

Jonathan Ellis - Merrill Lynch

Great. And then my other question is, can you just talk specifically about the commercial collection market, either announcing terms where pricing is now or may be directionally, how it's faired versus where it was last quarter?

Tod Holmes

Jonathan, first of all, in terms of the volume of that business is continuing to grow modestly, I'd say in that 1% to 2% range. When you look at the pricing side of the equation, where we see the mid single-digit types of increases. And we are holding the business; we don't see any change in our defection. So as we move forward, we think that's the appropriate place to be.

Jim O'Connor

Right I mean I think the key part to that is that we are getting price and the defection rates are flat. So again, and they've been flat for the last I think six or seven quarter. So, that tells me that the market is excepting the prices and the sector is still strong and is looking still to move price out.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from Leone Young with Citi, you may ask your question.

Leone Young - Citigroup

Yes, good morning, nice quarter.

Jim O'Connor

Thank you.

Leone Young - Citigroup

Obviously, the gross margin was very strong, and as you talked about due to price. But if you look at that gross margin, is there anything in there that you would consider somewhat unsustainable besides fuel?

Tod Holmes

Well, I think, we talked about the SG&A in the quarter, so, certainly year-to-date the SG&A is appropriate. The quarter SG&A was again probably by the 50 to 60 basis point benefit. The other point that I would make would be on our disposal side, and we articulated this, I believe in July, and continue to see it. The drought down here in the southeast part of the country is giving us the benefit in disposal by 40 basis points. So I think those are the two unique items that we've got when we look at the margins.

Leone Young - Citigroup

There is a follow-up to that. If oil prices stay or diesel prices stay where they are do you have a ballpark sense of how that could pressure margins in the fourth quarter?

Jim O'Connor

Obviously they are moving up. There will be some pressure, but I don't think they are going to be material. We've got the recovery, but the recovery is mostly dollar for dollar. We are staying right now top of that Leone, and we are going to still stay with our forecast have been improving the margins upwards to 150 to 200 basis points, right in that range.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Marshall Reid with Banc of America. You may ask your question.

Marshall Reid - Banc of America

Good morning.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning, Marshall.

Marshall Reid - Banc of America

You talked about renewing contracts at higher prices. Can you just talk about maybe what kind of price increases you're seeing on renewals? And I assume, also, you guys were out bidding for new business. How does pricing compare on new business?

Jim O'Connor

Well, I mean, obviously, when we're out looking at new business in the competitive marketplaces, let's say in our commercial industrial lines, we're moving our pricing up as we're moving pricing out. So when we look at same store sales or pricelist year-over-year, we're moving those prices up as we're moving price out in the marketplace. So that will be one part of my responsibility.

As we get into the municipal and franchise markets, we're able to renegotiate price increases, because I think when you look at the expectations within the sector for higher returns and better pricing, the market's moving up. The contracts that were renewed had anywhere from high single digit to low double-digit price increases only because the surrounding marketplaces had moved up. So, again, when you look at return expectation, we're seeing returns in bidding and bids upwards to anywhere from 17% to 19% returns on average over the term of the contract.

I think another factor is fuel. So depending on when that contract was originally bid and the terms for fuel escalation, most of the contracts had just a CPI in there, they needed to be reset for the much higher fuel cost that we see today than we saw four or five years ago. So that's also been a factor moving the price up.

Marshall Reid - Banc of America

Okay. And just a follow-up on temporary roll off. You mentioned price is stable. How sustainable is that given volume losses in a market, say, like Florida? And is it possible you guys are losing a little share by holding a line on price in a temporary roll-off?

Jim O'Connor

We don't believe we are. I mean, from our field reconnaissance, it says we're not. I think those are probably better questions asked of our competitors than us. Based on our reconnaissance, we'd say no.

And is it sustainable? As I've said when we've been out seeing investors, and then out to conferences, if there was going to be an impact we would have seen it by now. And the volume decrease here that we're experiencing today is just as strong as the commercial decrease we saw back in 2001. So there has been no move to market share. We get the isolated blips, but again it's the nature of our business, but nothing material or nothing universally across the company. So we feel, yes, it is sustainable.

Now again, that depends on how bad the rest of the economy may get if anybody breaks ranks. But I just don't see that happening. It's too hard to recuperate the price. We've had now almost six years to start to recuperate temporary roll off prices. And I think we're not about to want to give those up at this particular stage.

Operator

Thank you our last question of the day comes from Brian Butler with FBR. You may ask your question.

Brian Butler - FBR

Good morning.

Jim O'Connor

Good morning, Brian.

Brian Butler - FBR

Just on the C&D volumes, especially I guess on the residential side, can you put an historical perspective, kind of where the levels are, I mean way back to 2005 levels or somewhere in between, just help me out with that.

Jim O'Connor

You mean on the pricing or a volume standpoint?

Brian Butler - FBR

Really on the volumes side.

Jim O'Connor

Well, our business has grown steadily and dramatically over a two or three-year period. So I would think that our volumes are still, particularly with commercial construction being so strong, holding up above where they were two or three years ago. And I would think that the same sort of situation applies on a unit pricing basis because of, again, the higher fuel costs, the higher steel costs that goes into the containers and trucks and equipment.

Brian Butler - FBR

Okay. And then just a follow-up on the acquisition kind of market, are you seeing any more or less competition for assets out there, and could you comment possibly on what kind of evaluations you're seeing there or anything, is it starting to look less expensive, more expensive?

Jim O'Connor

During the quarter we may have brought a few million dollars worth of work. There is really not much on the market. So it's a little hard to get a sense of what the pricing is. But again, we're going to stick to our pricing disciplines and the financial criterion that we've set for ourselves five or six years ago on return on investment and internal rate of return. But no, we don't see the multiples coming down the ones that we are talking to there. They are probably right in that 5 to 5.5 to 7 range, depending on whether it's a fully integrated asset or a tuck-in.

Okay, operator. I think that will conclude today's call. I would like to thank everyone for joining us today. I'd like to remind everyone that a recording of this call is available today and tomorrow by calling 203-369-0082. Additionally, recording of the call will be available on Republic's website at www.republicservices.com.

Thank you for spending time with us today and have a great day.

Operator

Thank you. At this time, that does conclude today's conference. All parties may disconnect.

Copyright policy: All transcripts on this site are the copyright of Seeking Alpha. However, we view them as an important resource for bloggers and journalists, and are excited to contribute to the democratization of financial information on the Internet. (Until now investors have had to pay thousands of dollars in subscription fees for transcripts.) So our reproduction policy is as follows: You may quote up to 400 words of any transcript on the condition that you attribute the transcript to Seeking Alpha and either link to the original transcript or to www.SeekingAlpha.com. All other use is prohibited.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS A TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S CONFERENCE CALL, CONFERENCE PRESENTATION OR OTHER AUDIO PRESENTATION, AND WHILE EFFORTS ARE MADE TO PROVIDE AN ACCURATE TRANSCRIPTION, THERE MAY BE MATERIAL ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR INACCURACIES IN THE REPORTING OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE AUDIO PRESENTATIONS. IN NO WAY DOES SEEKING ALPHA ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS MADE BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEB SITE OR IN ANY TRANSCRIPT. USERS ARE ADVISED TO REVIEW THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S AUDIO PRESENTATION ITSELF AND THE APPLICABLE COMPANY'S SEC FILINGS BEFORE MAKING ANY INVESTMENT OR OTHER DECISIONS.

If you have any additional questions about our online transcripts, please contact us at: transcripts@seekingalpha.com. Thank you!

Source: Republic Services Q3 2007 Earnings Call Transcript
This Transcript
All Transcripts