Seeking Alpha
SA's VP content, editor in chief
Profile| Send Message|
( followers)  

Barron's Plugged In editor Mark Veverka says Google's recent foray into the multi-player game of mobile OSes is far from the slam-dunk some people automatically assume when they hear "Google" and "search" spoken in one sentence. The key difference between Google's unprecedented dominance in web search and its current open-source attack on wireless search, he says, is a crippling lack of much-coveted technology patents. Unlike web search, Google is late to the mobile search party, and without any mobile-phone software patents of its own, in an arena where its competitors boast hundreds, it stands exposed in the "adversarial world of mobile-wireless intellectual property." Even open-source efforts can be thwarted by expensive and time-consuming patent litigation, not to mention consumer reluctance to embrace open-source and its potential for weak support, reliability, and security issues. While Google with its massive $217B market cap may ultimately decide to obtain patents through acquisitions, competitors like Microsoft and incumbent Nokia are not likely to go down quietly.

Seeking Alpha's news briefs are combined into a pre-market summary called Wall Street Breakfast. Get Wall Street Breakfast by email -- it's free and takes only seconds to sign up.

Source: Google Phone OS No Slam Dunk - Barron's