Correlation of S&P 500 to Oil Prices
posted on: December 06, 2007
It is a long standing belief that when oil prices are up the market is down, and vise versa.
Below we highlight the correlation of changes in the S&P 500 to changes in the price of oil, with oil prices plotted as well. Over the long term, since 1988, the correlation coefficient was positive 44% of the time, negative 56%, and averaged -0.05.
click to enlarge
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Loading...
Symbols:
ETFs In Focus
sponsored by:
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Freddie/Fannie Plans In Motion; Why Are They Being Underplayed?
- Hedge Funds Are Getting Their Butts Kicked Too
- Energy Independence: It's About Demand, Not Supply
- Housing Prices: Bottom or Temporary Bear Break?
- McCainomics: What Can He Do?
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Why Commodities May Be Nearing a Turning Point »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Potash Corp. Update: Time To Buy? »
- Apple: Steve and I Have Been Wrong »
- Sarah Palin: Wall Street's Candidate »
- Precious Metals Manipulation: Lawyers Prepare for Battle »
- The Chinese Oil Problem »
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings »
- Gold Futures' Dirty Secret (Part II) »
- Wells Fargo Sham Revealed »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Global Equities Falling Through Support
- Don't Believe the Gold Bears' Hype
- Fannie & Freddie Bailout? - Fast Money Recap (9/5/08)
- Unconventional Energy Still Attractive - UBS
- Red Hat / Qumranet Deal Adds Fuel to the Virtualization Fire
- ETF Pick of the Week: iShares MSCI Netherlands
- Altria's Last Legal Hurdle Should Be Settled This Fall
- How Wal-Mart Really Beats Expectations
- Corning: Looking Very Cheap
- Leucadia's Key to Success
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Nuance Communications: An End to Acquisitive Growth
- Short Interest Rising in Tesoro; Shorts Covering Airline Positions
- Harbinger Capital: Cut Short
- Not Much Meat on Pilgrim's Pride's Bones
- Salesforce.com: Demystifying the Force
- Should We Listen to Boone Pickens on Oil?
- Energy Conversion Devices: Ridiculously High Valuation
- Three Reasons Solar Sell-off May Be in Early Innings
- Is the Market Rolling Over?
- Solar and Oil, Part Deux
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Fed Should Cut Rates - Cramer's Mad Money (9/5/08)
- Bullish on Wachovia - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/5/08)
- Worst Downgrades - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/5/08)
- Pimco's Bill Gross: Jim Cramer Is 'Courageous' and 'Entertaining'
- Cramer Sees the Light - Cramer's Mad Money (9/4/08)
- Keep Buying Big Brown - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/4/08)
- Don't Buy These Bonds - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/4/08)
- Loss of Integrity - Cramer's Mad Money Recap (9/3/08)
- Not Off the RIMM - Cramer's Lightning Round (9/3/08)
- Unbelievable Moves - Cramer's Stop Trading! (9/3/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »



This article has 2 comments:
----------------------...
Interesting topic but I don't know what they measured.
Was correlation measured instantaneously? at the end of each trading day (oil up a dollar S&P down a dollar, etc.)? monthly? quarterly?
Even if there was no simultaneous variation over whatever interval they were measuring it is entirely possible that there was correlation with a lag period, e.g., S&P might go down 3 months after a sustained rise in oil price, etc.
The theory behind the graph they showed is terrible; overlaying an independent variable on the dependent variable adds no information at all, yet the eye tends to view the rising oil prices of late as somehow reinforcing the absence of consistent S&P correlation.
Drug companies and less reputable researchers do this sort of thing all the time, designing visuals so as to suggest whatever outcome they deem favorable instead of showing the original data, a practice I used to rail against in my academic days. Why not just superimpose S&P against time and oil price against time? After that basic data is displayed one can get fancier with statistical graphs and the reader will be able to judge for him/herself whether the statistics seem to fit the original data or are a stretch.