Do You Still Need a Land Line? 3 comments
Submit
an article to
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Is there really any reason to maintain a plain-old telephone line? Increasingly, the answer is no.
Citigroup’s Michael Rollins wrote a report today which takes a look at the state of the “teleconomy,” and provides some interesting tidbits:
- The telcos continue to lose residential phone subscribers to both cable VoIP and wireless subscriptions at a steady 7%-8% a year.
- By 2010, wireless-only households should rise to 27%, from 13% last year and an estimated 17% this year.
- Cable VoIP penetration should jump from 10% last year and an estimated 14% this year to 25% by 2010.
- Wireless penetration should rise from an estimated 83% this year to 87% by the end of 2008.
- Consumer telephony is only 22% of overall telco revenue.
Despite those trends, Rollins has Buy ratings on AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ) and Embarq (EQ).
AT&T is holding a meeting with analysts tomorrow. Rollins expects a focus on growth drivers in its enterprise and wireless businesses, as well as new detail on its IPTV strategy.
Ahead of the meeting, AT&T Tuesday was down 65 cents to $37.82.
Related Articles
|
























my wife works in a skype-only office under the auspices of a large, slow university employer. our house only has one copper connection - for power. all information transfer is wireless. no cable tv, no land line, no cable internet access.
we're one mesh network away from freedom from corporate "service"
sf.meraki.com/overview