A U.S. Recession May Create a Soft Landing for China

Why all the fuss about the dangers a U.S. recession? Some academics point out that recessions are an important part of the business cycle, because they help to squeeze out the excesses from the economy. When the Fed unexpectedly cut interest rates by 50bps in August they made it clear that they were going to do everything in their power to prevent a recession. But doesn't this create a much wider form of moral hazard? If the Fed signals that it will always aim to prevent recessions, future investors may take on unnecessary risks and undermining the stability of markets. My argument here is that this moral hazard may already be embedded in China's notorious asset bubble.

Wall Street will probably give Bernanke a standing ovation if he managed to prevent a recession, but such a scenario will make him (potential) public enemy number one in China. Everyone agrees that China's economy is a ticking time bomb, and by now they have demonstrated that they are not in control of their own fate. The future China's asset bubble is not in the hands of China's authorities, it's in the hands of China's export markets.

Evidence is mounting that China cannot use domestic policies to slow down demand, and the trend isn't expected to change in 2008. China has aggressively raised domestic interest rates and reserve ratios, with little effect. A Morgan Stanley research note recently pointed out that China's "investment cycle tends to reflect the macro policy stances, which are influenced heavily by the political cycle in China. Since the early 1990s, fixed-asset investment growth rates have reached a peak every five years, and the year of peak growth rate 'happened' to be the year of change of government. The next change of government is due to take place in March 2008. If this pattern persists (i.e., investment cycle driven by political cycle), there appears to be a considerable risk of acceleration of investment growth next year, especially in view of the low interest rates, undervalued exchange rates and still-strong corporate earnings."

For more examples of China's inability to control their economy with domestic policies, be sure to read Martin Hutchinson's brilliant piece "<a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/IL05Cb02.html" target="_blank">The coming China Crash</a>" at the PrudentBear.com. Hutchison argues that the behavior of China Investment Corporation, the US$200 billion sovereign wealth fund set up by the Chinese government in September, shows why a China crash may be coming. A third of China Investment's portfolio is to be invested in Central Huijin Investment Company, a purchaser of bad loans from the Chinese banks. Hutchison demonstrates that the Chinese banking system's bad debt problem is in real terms about five times that of the United States, or about 40% of its GDP. He draws parallels between China's current situation and Japan's debt crisis in the early 90s that led to a period of little or no economic growth that lasted well over a decade.

If China was going to have an orderly slowdown, it would have to come from a slowdown in external demand. Assuming that China's asset bubble eventually pops, the sooner the better. A mild U.S. recession now might be the perfect parachute for China's high flying dragon, as a significant moderation in export growth could lead to an imported soft landing.

On the other hand, if Bernanke succeeds in avoiding a U.S. recession, demand for Chinese exports may pick up and China's ticking time bomb will speed up. Some suggest that a 50bps rate cut is on the cards at today's Fed meeting. In a classic example of yin and yang: such an event will be good news for Wall Street, and bad news for China.</p>

Comments

[Ehp246]

Since when did "everyone agree that Chinese economy is a ticking bomb"? If my disagreement is not worth much considering my lowly position, last a few articles in Economists appear to disagree as well.

[unimpressedpragmatist]

As usual, media pundits display their ignorance on the subjects of global power politics and international economics. Seeking Alpha should exercise more oversight on its selection of writers and their subject matter. Verbosity of the pen is no guarantee of true knowledge.

Media pundits make their living by disseminating rumors and predictions of impending disaster. Such is the case with this article. The United States is in a temporary state of economic unrest similar to a slightly upset stomach. There is too much strength in the economy in allow a slip into recession.

China, on the other hand, possesses a very thin veneer of economic well being based upon the strength and continued successes of the U.S. economy. A reversal of our economy demonstrated in recession would bring China’s crashing down around its feet.

The Chinese may be amateurs and johnnies-come-lately in capitalism but they are not stupid. Any moves on their part to destabilize the economy of the United States would result in a complete collapse of their economy. So, they make a lot of noise and issue threats but will do nothing to kill the golden goose, or in this case, the golden eagle.

[Globalinvesting]

GlobalInvesting411.com
theRetailAxis.com
SacramentoPitbulls.com
Foreclosure-spot.com
Acne-Spot.com
EnvironmentDistrict.co...
eDog-Domain.com
Coffee-Advice.com
ClassicPontiacs.info
3rdWorldPets.com
the3rdWorld.com
efishingpad.com
mydailygoogle.com