Video CDN Market Size Could Grow To $800 Million In 2008

As we near the end of 2007, I've seen a few reports estimating the CDN space to have been anywhere between $800 million and $1.4 billion for the year. The reports I have seen do not break out what specific "CDN" products they are talking to and how those numbers were calculated. So with that in mind, here is how I sized the market for 2007 and the data I used to come up with the number. This does not include revenue numbers for P2P only based vendors.

The number I am talking to is for the outsourced delivery of video in the U.S. market and is specific to video delivery, be it streaming, progressive download, live or on-demand. I also looked at all outsourced CDN services and not companies who sold products or services for internal delivery, such as Cisco's CDN solution.

While not all of the companies listed below provide public data on their revenue, many of them tell me off the record what they are billing or I have other data to know their revenue. In these cases, I have grouped some of those companies together below so as not to expose data they have given me privately. In no particular order:

- Internap (INAP) (run rate of about $24 million for 2007, nearly all of which comes from the U.S.)

- Limelight Networks (LLNW) (estimated to do about $105 million for 2007 and I estimate about $95+ million of that to be from the U.S.)

- Akamai (AKAM) (it is estimated that about $400-$450 million of their approxiametly $625 million $900 million in revenue comes from their CDN offering. What percentage of that $400-$450 million is specific to video and comes from the U.S. market is up for debate, but I estimate it to be about $300 million.) Note: The $900 million number I originally quoted is their 2008 revenue guidance, not 2007.

- Level 3 (LVLT) (didn't do much in the way of video delivery in 2007 since their streaming product only recently launched, however their CDN product for video downloads has been around for about half the year. Estimated 2007 revenue about $2 million.)

- VeriSign (VRSN) (why I don't have exact numbers for VeriSign, taking the European business out of the picture, I estimate the CDN revenue in the U.S to be about $8 million for the year, the majority of which was P2P based from the Kontiki product.)

- Mirror Image, CacheLogic, Panther Express, CacheFly and Advection.NET (combined, they will do about $20 million in video delivery for 2007, U.S. based.)

- EdgeCast, CDNetworks and BitGravity (combined, I estimate these companies did about $5 million for the year as would be expected since they all just recently launched their services in the later half of the year.)

- PEER 1 (PIX), NaviSite (NAVI) and Ignite Technologies (combined, I estimate they did about $8 million in 2007 for video delivery services in the U.S.)

- Regional service providers. While not typically not classified as CDNs as they tend to go after small and medium sized business, they still provide outsourced video delivery services and tend to focus in the U.S. market in particular. (all of these companies combined did under $20 million in 2007.)

So based on that data, the market for outsourced video delivery services in the U.S. for 2007 comes in at $482 million. Factor in an error margin of $20-$25 million and the market for video delivery services in the U.S. for 2007 was between $450-$500 million. Very different than the $800 million and $1.4 billion number that is being reported.

The real question is what it will grow to in 2008? Based on what I am seeing in contract terms, increased volume of bits, higher bitrates, etc... I expect to see the U.S. video delivery market grow to about $800 million for 2008. If you factor in the revenue for P2P delivery networks in the new year, that number could go up another $50 million.

I know some may disagree with my market size numbers and that is fine, but if you can't provide the data to back up the number you published in a report, it's hard for anyone to take that number seriously. Anyone who wants to quote any of my numbers above in a report, press release, on their website or any other format is welcome to do so as long as they attribute it to me by name.

Comments

[the secretinsider]

Limelight networks are a bunch of scam artists who have already run past companies into the ground. They just rename the company and start all over again. What a joke, people only use them because theyre cheap and options are limited. Go for akamai!

[User 133057]

Care to share your sources for your accusations against LimeLight Networks? Or are you being a troll because you bought shares in Akamai?