No Bottom Yet: Housing Permits Drop To 14-Year Lows 4 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
The Commerce Department reported(.pdf) that housing starts were down 3.7 percent in November and permits for new construction fell 1.5 percent to new 14-year lows, once again dashing any hope that the most recent up-tick in housing starts was the beginning of a bottom for homebuilders.
You'd think that things can't get any worse from here, but there is still a huge overhang of unsold homes, lenders are justifiably more cautious these days, and who wants to buy one of those unsold homes when all you hear about is foreclosures and falling prices?
Monday's Housing Market Index from the National Association of Homebuilders remained at all-time lows for the third consecutive month. David Seiders, chief economist for the trade group noted, "The momentum in the housing market still is downward. Housing starts, given the inventory overhang, probably won't turn up until maybe the third quarter of next year.''
Adding to the growing evidence that you can work at Harvard and still be a moron, Nicolas Retsinas, director of Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies commented "The fundamental problem with housing is oversupply.''
No, the fundamental problem is that a speculative bubble just burst and now everyone is thinking rationally again - home prices are still too high, potential buyers realized home prices are still too high, lenders are now interested in the borrower actually paying back the home loan, and investors don't want to go near securitized debt.
Could someone aside from Robert Shiller and about a thousand people with blogs say this just once?
Related Articles
|






















How about providing some metrics. When will "too high" no longer be "too high?" Are we content to say "I'll know it when I see it?
I'm not sure I would rely on Dr. Shiller (Actually I'm sure I would not.) While he has a useful means of indexing the "past," he has been woefully short on accuracy about the future. He's been saying the same thing for 10+ years, also without any metrics, just his opinion. (Eventually the "wolf" had to show up!)
I also wouldn't rest on the speculators on the CME Housing Futures as a predictor of the housing market. The only CME futures that are more thinly traded are Hurricane Futures on the CME.
Regards,
Clay
I address your
When will "too high" no longer be "too high?
The past, corrected for inflation, provides a clear basis for inferring a (real) future -- to say the least! Please see first and last charts here:
“Real Dow & Real Homes & Personal Saving” at
homepage.mac.com/ttsmy...
And please note, of course, that the exampled real 41% lower is achieved (1) by a 41% lower US$ nominal house price, or (2) by a 70% higher CPI-U consumer prices, or (3) by a combination of (1) and (2).
Is this clear (I hope so)?
Tim is right on,
how about looking at home price to rent ratios, cap rates for rentals, home price to income ratios, the cost of materials+labor required for new construction vs asking prices, all of which are still way out of whack. Although to look at these, one might have to call himself an investor
-S