Lawsuits as an Asset Class

Patrick Hosking of The Times has news of two new hedge funds which seek to invest in lawsuits. I don't think this is new; in fact, I believe that US hedge fund Elliott Associates has been doing it for some time.

The problem here is a doctrine known as "champerty" - something that Elliott was actually found guilty of, once, in a ruling which was overturned on appeal. The problem is that it's considered "intermeddling" to invest in someone else's lawsuit (doncha just love these legal terms?). So the solution is to buy litigable securities - often defaulted bonds or loans - for one's own account, on the cheap. Thus does an investor become a genuine plaintiff in good standing, with a legal claim enforceable by dint of the loan documentation.

Historically, then, lawsuits-as-an-asset-class have been largely confined to the "vulture" end of the distressed-debt spectrum. But where there's a large amount of profit, you can be sure that some hedge fund somewhere will find a way to get in on the act. And I wouldn't be at all surprised to see hedge funds finding some way to invest in torts and class-action suits, down the line. Maybe U.K. hedge funds MKM Longboat and Juridica will be the first to do so.

Comments

[Dick:]

In the patent field, laywers have been "buying Lawsuits" for years. They buy an expired patent that has been infringed. It has no value whatsoever, except for its litigation value. Then, owning the patent, they can bring suit against the infringer.

2007 Dec 25 05:52 PM

[Will Riddle:]

Thanks for bringing attention to this. This should be illegal. Lawsuits have evolved in America from a way of recourse of wrongs, to a big business, which destroys real big businesses, and it needs to stop.

2007 Dec 27 12:29 AM