Breaking Down the Oil Service Holders ETF (ETF: OIH) 8 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Eddy Elfenbein submits: Here’s a closer look at the 18 stocks in the Oil Service Holders ETF (OIH). This has become one of the most popular exchange-traded funds on Wall Street. Since May 13, the ETF is up 75%.
I’ve thought that this sector has been overpriced for some time. Yet, despite what I think, the stocks keep going up, up, up.
With this chart, I wanted to show you just how high Wall Street’s expectations are. Look at the projected five-year growth rates. It’s rare for a company to grow its earnings 20% a year for five years, much less 30% or 50%. These projections are very optimistic.
Note: This is a corrected version of my original post where I had listed the 35 stocks in the Dow Jones Oil Equipment Services Index. Thanks to Roger Nusbaum for pointing me in the right direction. You can see more info on the OIH here.
| Symbol | Company | Proj. Five-Year Growth Rate | Forward P/E | Market Cap |
| BHI | Baker Hughes | 15.0% | 21.6 | $24.8 |
| BJS | BJ Services Company | 22.0% | 19.6 | $12.9 |
| CAM | Cooper Cameron | 16.0% | 23.1 | $5.4 |
| DO | Diamond Offshore Drilling | 40.0% | 15.6 | $10.4 |
| ESV | ENSCO International | 44.0% | 12.2 | $8.0 |
| GSF | Globalsantafe | 45.0% | 14.0 | $14.1 |
| GRP | Grant Prideco | 25.0% | 18.9 | $6.2 |
| HAL | Halliburton | 17.5% | 20.0 | $38.1 |
| HC | Hanover Compressor | 7.5% | 53.8 | $1.5 |
| NBR | Nabor Industries | 58.8% | 13.0 | $12.3 |
| NOV | National Oilwell Varco | 25.0% | 23.2 | $12.4 |
| NE | Noble | 43.0% | 15.0 | $11.3 |
| RDC | Rowan Companies | 25.0% | 12.9 | $4.7 |
| SLB | Schlumberger Limited | 17.5% | 26.7 | $72.3 |
| SII | Smith International | 17.0% | 21.1 | $8.8 |
| TDW | Tidewater | 29.0% | 12.8 | $3.1 |
| RIG | Transocean | 50.0% | 17.6 | $25.5 |
| WFT | Weatherford International | 25.0% | 21.0 | $15.0 |
Related Articles
|





















BHI 10.27%
BJS 7.47%
CAM 2.54%
DO 5.90%
ESV 3.81%
GRP 2.90%
GSF 7.80%
HAL 11.01%
HC 0.50%
NBR 6.25%
NE 6.04%
NOV 3.33%
RDC 2.31%
RIG 9.33%
SII 4.45%
SLB 9.11%
TDW 1.81%
WFT 5.18%
Click here for more details.
HOLDRS are not Cap weighted. They are all trusts that were created in such a way that they can not be changed by MER. Most started woth 20 components and now most a a few less due to take overs. The share amounts in there now are what was put in there at the beginning.
Am I missing something with Eddy's post and the 35 holdings?
Interesting reading your comments here!
But I have some more questions and thoughts.
@ Eddy
You write: " ... Look at the projected five-year growth rates. It’s rare for a company to grow its earnings 20% a year for five years, much less 30% or 50%. These projections are very optimistic..."
It would be worth double checking those numbers. I tried it now, but I think the Holder website is down, to start with.
Do you have any other sources, other than the data provided on the holder webpage?
Another idea, I borrowed from Peter Lynch, is that cyclical stocks' p/e ratio are to be considered in an inverse way; high p/e ratio means an end of a downward cycle, and hence a buy; and vice versa. This would mean that oil service companies stocks are still cheap, regardless their sharp rise.
But this assumes, that oil service companies are cyclical stocks. At least in the past they behaved in a cyclical way. But oil was not running outin the past, as we know nowadays. The point I want to make is that in a running out of oil scenario those stocks could go far higher.If we are really running out ? And I would not bet against it. According to Matt Simmons, the oil infrastructure is pretty old and need some serious investments. On the top of that, less easy oil means more investment in the exploitation infrastructure.
The future will tell us ...
I am just surprised that the oil service sector underperformed crude oil prices over the last 10 months. Buying oil etfs would have been a better trade ...
Greets
Pierre