Ten Solid Clean Energy Companies to Buy on the Cheap: #8 Quanta Services

It may be a stretch to call a company with a P/E ratio in the high 30s "cheap," but in the case of Quanta Services (PWR), it's a bargain.

I won't repeat myself about why electric transmission and distribution [T&D] investments are a good bet. Put simply, the grid has been long neglected, and improved long distance transmission is essential to bringing large scale renewables such as solar and wind onto the grid.

How does Quanta fit in? They build transmission lines for utilities. When I ask industry insiders what company is best placed to actually string the wires or lay the cable, the answer is Quanta Services (the answer used to be InfraSource, until that company was acquired by Quanta.)

According to a recent article in the January/February issue of EnergyBiz (this particular article, on p.56 of the print version, does not seem to be online), Northeast Utilities (NU) signed a 6 year contract with Quanta in order to assure themselves access to T&D contracting services which they expect to be in short supply. According to Jim Muntz, a Senior Vice President at NU, "There are only a few contractors who have the capability to do contracts on this scale, so we determined that before it's taken away from us, we would have to lock up their services for a number of years."

Another reason to expect growth in the industry comes from the same article. According to Tim Hope, a vice president of operations at ABB (another excellent transmission investment), "While other parts of the utility's operations... looked to outsourcing solutions, T&D seems to be one of the last departments to embrace the concept." This means that the market for outsourced T&D can not only grow as utilities invest more, but also as they increasingly turn to outsourcing, either due to regulatory pressure or because of insufficient internal resources.

While I might have preferred the pure-play electric T&D opportunity of Infrasource before the merger, Quanta's strategy of becoming a one-stop shop for infrastructure in natural gas, telecommunication, and broadband cable as well as power should serve it well if these industries continue to converge. The strategy may also allow the power division to draw on additional workers with similar skills from telecoms and cable, if or when the skills shortage outlined above takes hold.

Doesn't that make a high-thirties P/E start to sound cheap? It does to Cramer and an analyst at Morgan Stanley. I'm hoping the current market decline will make even cheaper.

DISCLOSURE: Tom Konrad and/or his clients have long positions in PWR, ABB.

Comments

[ballsschweaty]

If Cramer likes it, that's good enough for me. I just turn off my thinking cap and blindly follow what Cramer says.

[valueinvestor123]

JP Morgan covers PWR not Morgan Stanley, so you may want to get your facts straight first. That being said, I like PWR, but this article does nothing to convince me that the company is a buy. Especially since your conclusion is that its cheap and cramer and an analyst back you in that analysis. That would never fly at any hedge fund or money management firm as a valuation argument and you should not use it here.

[girfriend]

So what is not to like about PWR, I am a novice and thinking about getting some.