Lehman Brothers (LEH) have now entered the ETF fray (actually, their product line up contains exchange traded notes) and they’re branded as Opta ETNs. Well this is an interesting development and one that I don’t find very surprising.
Let’s think about the ETF industry for a minute (I am aggregating ETNs and any other derivative of this type of instrument … no not that derivative … into the term “ETF”). Are we moving more and more towards alternative asset classes? Are we adding sexier functionality to products? Are actively managed ETFs on the horizon? The answer to these questions is not just “yes” but we’re basically there. If the ETF industry is less about beta and more towards something else … some alternative or exotic or “non-standard” beta and even possibly (wow!) alpha then watch out. Investment banks are going to jump in and then some.
Why wouldn’t they? Once you move away from the more traditional views of passive management, you’re moving closer to the I-banks sweet spot. The higher fees (margins) don’t hurt either.
One of the Opta ETNs covers commodities in general with a fantastic ticker symbol (RAW). Another covers the hot topic of the day, agriculture (EOH). And the last one brings some competition to PSP in the private equity (PPE) space. Note how Lehman uses the word “Beta” in the commodity ETNs but not the private equity ETN. I agree … private equity is no asset class.
Regardless of classification, Lehman is entering the ETF/ETN space focused on alternative investments. It would not surprise me one bit if other I-banks enter in a similar fashion. Many, like Merrill Lynch have publicly spoken on their hedge fund replication products … they could be turned to ETFs. There are many ETFs that are in the middle of regulatory approval manufactured by existing ETF providers both large and small (firms that is) that, when launched in the market, would have no competition. These would be rather esoteric asset classes or strategies such as carbon credits or 130/30. Again, I-banks live and breath these markets and strategies and unlike startup ETF providers have the cash (some, thanks to their new friends, the Sovereign Wealth Funds) to make a real go at it.
If the I-banks do jump in to the ETF marketplace in a big way, there could be significant fallout. More products and more competition would make it harder for the many new entrants in the field (that are not I-banks or backed by them) to not only establish themselves but grow in a significant manner. Like mutual funds, hedge funds and other financial products, ETFs are sold not bought … just find out who makes the big money at these firms. I don’t see how the little guys could go up against a marketing machine heavyweight like a Lehman, Goldman (GS), Merrill (MER) or Bear (BSC).
Worse still, I wouldn’t want to be a mutual fund right about now. Not only do they have to keep up with their lobby against the favorable tax treatment of ETNs but they must also be thinking about how to stop this whole active management ETF train from leaving the station. Too late … I think that was the whistle and last call.
Well, if you welcome competition (and you should), hopefully the average ETF management fee will at least go down … wait, we’re talking Wall Street I-bank heavyweights right? Check that. Don’t hold your breath.