Research in Motion: Unlike Apple, No Slowdown in Subscriber Growth 28 comments
an article to
-
Font Size:
-
Print
- TweetThis
Research in Motion (RIMM) released updated subscriber growth and unlike Apple (AAPL), they are not seeing a slowdown.
RIMM now expects
net subscriber account additions for Q4 to be approximately 15-20%
higher than the 1.82 million net subscriber account additions
forecasted by RIMM on December 20, 2007. The total BlackBerry
subscriber account base is expected to be approximately 14 million at
the end of the quarter.
Jim
Balsillie, Co-CEO at RIMM said:
BlackBerry smartphones proved to be a big hit throughout the holiday selling season and we’re pleased to see RIMM’s business momentum continuing in the new year.The seasonal slowdown in net subscriber account additions that we expected in the new year did not occur and our focused execution with partners has continued to produce strong results within both enterprise and consumer segments.
While Apple's recent cutback in orders was seen as a "seasonal" cutback by Apple supporters, and not a sign of slowing sales, what can we now make of RIMM's results? Well, we now know people are still clamoring to buying smarts phone, just not iPhones. A 20% increase over estimates is massive.
The reason? I can get a Blackberry Pearl for $99 from
almost all wireless carriers. Before the iPhone was even released I
said "lower the price to $299 and you may have something, a $599 phone
will not gain mass acceptance no matter what it does."
Now rumors are out indicating that just might be happening. It would be the second price drop on the phone in less than a year (8 months).
Jobs
missed the market on this one. The iPod was unlike any other device at
the time it was introduced and thus the reason for its price
inelasticity. Apple was able to charge "less for less" (lower prices
were only on lower memory products) rather than giving customers
more for a lower price in order to keep pace with competition. Now that cell phones are beginning to become customers' music players, we are noticing price drops in iPods.
The
iPhone is unique, but its features appear in many other devices at a
fraction of the price. One can argue all day about the intricacies
of those features and whose are better, but for the vast majority of
people, those intricacies are irrelevant while price is not. In a slowing
economy, people will choose price for a commodity like device. Based on
the results, even the most ardent Apple supporters must admit this. The
only other option is that consumers feel the Blackberry is a superior
product and thus the reason for diverging sales trends.
Just
watching local TV one would witness a huge push by Verizon (VZ) and
Sprint (S) in their Blackberry promotions. Even AT&T (T) is sending
me mailers pushing the Blackberry. The most common price is the $99 for
a Pearl. An Apple price drop to $299 is confirmation of the
above. The thing is, RIMM is packing more and more into its $99 and
$199 models. $299 may not be enough for Apple, they may have to go lower...
Disclosure: Sold Apple $280 calls in Jan.
Related Articles
|
-
The Seeking Alpha 100
See allThe top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication in the last week
Seeking Alpha 100 » -
Fastest Climbers
Those with the largestSee all
increase in followers
in the last week
Fastest Climbers » -
Top Commenters
Top commenters,
as ranked by their peers-
1
User 353732
-
2
Moon Kil Woong
-
3
doubleguns
-
4
optionsgirl
-
5
Mayascribe
Top Commenters » -
1
-
Top Instabloggers
The 100 most activeSee all
Instabloggers.
Top Instabloggers » -
Top StockTalkers
TopSee all
StockTalkers.
Top StockTalkers »
Anyone can roll a joint and spout lazy pseudo analysis.
Apple, until I see otherwise, from a credible source, is on track with iPhone, iPod, and Mac sales.
Don't delude yourself with your obvious pipedream.
Maybe the Blackberry is the new RAZR? Look at Google statistics for web traffic and you see the iPhone blowing out any other device. So maybe everyone is getting Blackberries because they can afford them, not because they really want a full-featured web browser. There is a market for both.
Besides, no one has proven that Apple's cutbacks aren't correct. What if 6 months from now Blackberry is sitting on millions of items in inventory and Apple is on target?
There is simply no logic here. Current massive price reductions by one company (RIMM pearl at $90) are a sign of strength while future price reductions at another company (APPL iphone rumor) are a sign of weakness. And there is no mention that RIMM is not raising its revenue numbers. The real story is that both RIMM and AAPL are benefiting from exploding demand in advanced phones. The iphone is in such high demand that there is a hot black market for the device with people hacking them to run in markets not yet supported. Mentioning how the competition will catch up to the iphone while not mentioning how the market will catch up to a blacberry shows further bias. This blogger is a hack and should be ignored.
i fail to see what web stats have anything to do with sales? that is a commentary on the user.
RIMM is saying "sales" are ahead of expectations, not "expected demand"...
Apple just cutback orders in anticipation of a slowdown. so they may be sitting on loads of components already. This must be real because of the lag time to turn around production. They just cannot say "oops, we need more" and get the stuff tomorrow.
they have to be sure demand will slow.
Secondly, Apple is most likely coming out with a new model that will make the blackberry look even more obsolete (if that were possible).
Certainly, it's well know that Apple is likely to release a new iPhone in the not too distant future, meaning that sales could slow because nobody wants to buy and new device comes out right afterwards. Many people tell me they are waiting for one with 3G. Could be rumors about a price cut is because a new device is coming out and Apple has to shore up the price points.
There's no confirmation of cutbacks, just hearsay coming from component suppliers. They are numerous suppliers and many inputs, and likely for some parts Apple users several manufactures. - and most inputs are commodities and can be used in many devices, not just specific to an iPhone.
Hence, input makers on the other side don't have a full perspective of Apple's supply chain and distribution. And knowing Apple, you know they try to keep everyone out of the loop. It's probably speculation.
It's very possible that cutbacks are that high, but can't take it as confirmed fact.
It's possible that the cutbacks are not iPhones, iPod Touches, bc they share the same components excepts for the wireless radio. There are only two suppliers for it.
Apple could have switched suppliers thus ending orders with current ones.
Possible that Apple s squeezing suppliers. Cutting back on suppliers when they have a glut, adding pressure to slash prices. Apple could then procure later at a much lower price. Likely not, but can't rule it out.
Apple is very secretive and calculated. Analyst don't are clueless to Apple's doings, they always way off on their earnings estimates.
We'll know for sure eventually, but now one can only speculate,
First. How are you comparing subscriber growth? Supply orders for various Apple components is not device-in-hand-bought-... subscriber growth. You're not even comparing the same thing!
Second. RIMM subscribers up, but no revenue increase. That is getting ignored and is a VERY bad sign. What's the explanation for their margins not holding? RIMM revenue is not increasing as much as it should for increased subscriber takedown.
Maybe Apple has issues, maybe not. But this kind of unscientific garbage journalism is one of the reasons why I grow less and less interested in wasting time on Seeking Alpha.
finance.yahoo.com/tech...
You use RUMORS to CONFIRM speculation?!?
Classic.
You need to go back to J-school... assuming you ever went there to begin with.
Thompson
When did Apple say they were experiencing a slowdown in Iphone sales?
The only data discussed at the CC was 3.704 Mil at end of year and 4 Mil by SJ at Mac World. How does this equate to this big slowdown. What data shows Apple has cutback production of the Iphone? While I agree that a lower price will increase sales, it will also reduce margins and affect profitability. I think Apple's doing great by not having to sell a phone at $99 and hope the carriers give them a large enough payback. Also I don't think Apple wants to set the price artificially low to gain customers because they would cannibalize the IPOD touch sales if the Iphone were cheaper.
His analysis is a logical fallacy, commonly refered to as questionable cause.
Wow, now there's a guy with balls...if you keep it up, you might be able to move out of the trailer park.
A historical FYI: the iPod wasn't (and current models still aren't) "less for less". The first model had a 5GB HD, which had only been done by one other niche player at the time it came out. It was (and still is) a "more for more" strategy, like the iPhone and the Mac. Notice the theme?
His bogus logic and assumptions are another matter entirely, and previous comments have adequately covered those issues.
My own thinking (BTW, I'm long-term long on AAPL, buying Jan'10 100 calls) is that both AAPL and RIM will do OK for some time, with AAPL blowing RIM out of the water on a comparative basis in terms of revenue and profits.
The iPhone has breathed life into the smartphone markets, and the rising tide will lift all the players in that market space. Prior to the iPhone, RIM had this market space pretty much to themselves, and they have exploited the corporate connections in a very adroit manner. Apple is going after the consumer markets first, and perhaps later (if ever) they will target the corporate smartphone market space.
Apple will find it difficult to crack the corporate markets, but I suspect that with AT&T helping them, they will exert sustained pressure on RIM in the coming months. AT&T is a formidable competitor in the corporate communications world, and RIM lacks other product lines to support them when margins thin out in the heat of actual competition. I don't see how RIM can last, and expect them to be eventually acquired by some cellular company.
Despite my bullish position in AAPL LEAPs, I don't really mind if the stock continues to sink -- and in fact I rather expect it to, as history leads me to expect a low in the July-August time frame due to seasonal factors, when I shall be getting more serious about loading up with AAPL LEAPs.
Trying to time the markets on a short-term basis during turbulence like this strikes me as lunacy. I'll buy a bit over time, increasing as things deteriorate, with a target of at least a year away.
This is an irresponsible post. We'll know more once Apple and RIMM release their next set of earnings in April.
Rumor + Rumor does not = True
LOL
Apple did NOT say it is experiencing a slowdown in iPhone subscribers. Apple gave seasonal revenue and earnings guidance that Wall Street did not like.
Apple NEVER said, nor implied, that its iPhone subscribers are slowing.
Maybe when the quarter ends, iPhone subscribers could be UP.