Seeking Alpha
About this author:

Think for a moment as a cotton farmer. You have a fixed amount of acreage, which you typically divvy up accordingly: 50% to cotton and the other 50% to a range of three different crops: corn, soybeans and wheat. Due to planting seasons – we’ll get into the specifics of this in a moment - and the climate of the region, you have constrained yourself to the national average of growing 3 types of crop on your farm. Remember, as a farmer, you look to the futures prices to determine how to allocate acreage so you can harvest the most profitable crop next year.

Now imagine for a moment that out of your normal crop of corn, wheat and cotton (a typical Texas cotton farmer's farm make-up), two of your crops have futures trading at record highs. When you factor in the average costs and yield for each of the three crops to determine your profitability, it would take a rise in your third, lonely, crop of roughly 35% to be on profitability par with the other two. This is the pricing incentive causing farmers in the Southwest and Texas to allocate more of their farms land to soybeans, corn and/or wheat then in past years. As a result, America is witnessing a decrease in planted acres of cotton for next season.

As a result of tight global stock-to-use ratio and America’s position as the world’s exporter of cotton (40% comes from our farmers), a decrease in next year’s acreage devoted to cotton planting in America will result in a price spike from today’s prices. The world’s current cotton inventory (55 million 480-lb bales) would provide about 5.5 months of the world’s demand (according to 2007/2008 yearly demand of roughly 120 million 480-lb bales). Further, at today’s levels, soybeans, corn and wheat remain attractive alternatives for farmers until cotton reaches $0.90-1.00.

Recent legislation moving through Congress threatens to take away a critical farm subsidy, which has provided cotton farmers with a price floor guaranteed through the Federal Government. If successful, the risk/reward for farmers planting cotton given the current pricing environment for wheat, corn and soybeans may force farmers to swap more cotton acreage at an increased rate.

China (30%), India (20%), and Pakistan (7%), who along with the U.S. (16%) make up 73% of 2007/2008’s cotton production, are all net importers of cotton and have shown in recent weeks a very protectionist regime when it comes to other soft commodities related to food. As an export driven market, and with anticipation of the argument that the rest of the world is going to slow down, similar to what we’ve seen in the U.S., you should know the per capita consumption of cotton averaged 35 lbs in 2007; and in 2001 (a year of recession), we saw cotton retreat 2.4 lbs per person, only to raise back to previous levels in 2002.

If you don’t believe me, just ask Professor Carl G. Anderson. Texas A&M’s renowned professor on cotton reported that:

The big question is how much cotton acreage will be planted in the U.S. next season. Alternative crops continue to offer favorable prices compared to cotton. Cotton acreage might slip below 10 million acres. Texas is the only state where 2008/09 acreage may remain stable. The Delta states have the greatest flexibility to reduce cotton acreage. The Southeast and Western regions will also reduce cotton plantings. Two seasons of sharp cuts in cotton acres will tighten U.S. carryover stocks substantially for the 2008/09 crop.

Looking at previous rallies in soybeans, corn and wheat over the past 15 years, we see cotton prices lag their rallies by about a year’s time. As November and December represent planting times for wheat and corn in the south, we can expect the upcoming data to be a catalyst for a price move in cotton.

Factoring a conservative 20% increase in projected costs of corn, soybeans and wheat, in given future levels today, 2008 and 2009 cotton planting acreage should decrease to 6.5 million acres. When factoring the regions accounting for these acres and their historic yields, America will produce 12.8 and 11.6 million bales, respectively, forcing pressure on international growers – some of which have already seen full penetration of Bt seeds – to make up for America's shortfall, resulting in a low of 10% stock-to-use ratio in 2009. A quick comparison of price and stock-to-use ratio (unadjusted for inflation) shows that cotton could trade up to $1.00 per contract. When adjusted for inflation, cotton’s high in the 70s reached $2.40 per contract.

I will leave you with this thought (a new approach to blame China): everyone who attends the 2008 Olympics will want to buy two cotton shirts – given expected attendance, that’s a lot of extra cotton.

If you’re thinking of investing in cotton via futures, note that May is soon to be the new front month contract.

If futures aren’t for you, take a look at the Cotton ETF listed in London [COTN]. Additionally, the iPath Dow Jones-AIG Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) and the Rogers International Commodity Index – Agriculture ETN (RJA) both provide exposure to cotton along with other agriculture commodities. I’m always a believer of buy what you know best.

And don’t forget to buy an extra cotton shirt after making your purchase!

Print this article with comments

This article has 13 comments:

  •  
    Don’t forget to buy an extra cotton shirt after making your purchase?
    2008 Feb 28 05:04 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Some more details on the structure of COTN would be helpful.

    Interesting that specific Softs (and some other commodities) have not been "carved up" into tradable chunks by ETF and ETN creators, so that investors can be in the actual Cocoa, Cotton, Sugar, etc. markets, somewhat like the REITS changed real estate to creat liquidity and more easily digested chunks of commitments.

    Perhaps it will come?
    2008 Feb 28 09:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    6.5M acres? Did you guess or something? This is the lowest estimate I have seen. Most estimates are at 9.5 Planted, and 8.76 harvested. Don't get me wrong, I am bullish on cotton. But you can't make up inaccurate numbers. If the NCC came out with a 6.5Ma number Pakistan, India, and China would have bought in the open market already. Not to mention buyers would have ignored the Uzbek "import ban"....

    NOTE FROM SA EDITORS: THIS COMMENT WAS EDITED TO REMOVE UNNECESSARY ABUSE THAT ADDED NOTHING TO THE POINT MADE IN THE COMMENT.
    2008 Mar 01 03:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    GLG - happy to send you the numbers...

    strumwasser@gmail.com
    2008 Mar 02 12:10 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Additionally, if you believe that 9.5m number out of the u.s. then why are you bullish on cotton? At that production stock-to-use ratio remains well above historic lows and any indication of tight inventory. In this case it took field research, farmer contact - lots of homework time - to come to a number. You'll notice in the next two months when official acreage report numbers are released that cotton acreage is below current NCC and USDA estimates.
    2008 Mar 02 04:21 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    2010 dec.
    2008 Mar 04 10:00 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Hey, I think the GLG guy was right. Acres at 9.39M. Are you still bullish on cotton?
    2008 Mar 31 10:23 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Do you still own your COTN? I need to know please. You seemed very bearish on cotton with higher acres. You said above:

    "if you believe that 9.5m number out of the u.s. then why are you bullish on cotton?"

    Should we sell? Are you selling your COTN?

    Thanks

    2008 Mar 31 10:36 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    I lost my shirt on this, thanks very much. I now can't feed my family.
    2008 Mar 31 10:56 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Well Farmer Joe, thats bullish for cotton. Because now you have to buy a NEW shirt. Which is made from cotton. Those extra acres are now meaningless.

    Im still amazed that you would argue with the rest of the world on a subject you havent traded in the past. Most of us have either worked on cotton farms as kids, or have been trading this for over 10 years.

    Academic research is very often way off the mark. Thanks.
    2008 Mar 31 11:02 AM | Link | Reply
  •  
    April 2 (Bloomberg) -- Cotton fell for the fourth time in
    five sessions after the International Cotton Advisory Committee
    said global production will rise in the next marketing year.
    Output will increase 3.3 percent to 26.9 million metric
    tons in the year that begins Aug. 1, the ICAC said yesterday.
    The group represents 44 cotton-producing and -consuming
    countries. Use will rise 1.3 percent to 27.5 million tons,
    dropping global stockpiles 5.5 percent to 10.96 million tons.
    ``There are still burdensome stocks,'' said Fain Shaffer,
    president of Infinity Trading Corp. in Medford, Oregon.
    Cotton for May delivery fell 0.27 cent, or 0.4 percent, to
    70.18 cents a pound on ICE Futures U.S., formerly the New York
    Board of Trade. The price has surged 32 percent from a year
    ago, reaching a 12-year high of 92.86 cents on March 5.

    2008 Apr 02 04:37 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Part one of the thesis is in place... GLG was right, I updated the spot price for cotton to reflect feb's increase and in return produced acerage count of 9.13 ) 3% margin of error from as reported.

    Part two will be born out as supply/demand is shown throughout the world helping to bring down America's 9m bale inventory. America's stock is much more loose then the rest of the world.

    Look for Thursday's export numbers, look for April 9th USDA report and get long may cotton below 71... and long dec below 79.
    2008 Apr 02 10:10 PM | Link | Reply
  •  
    Perhaps you should have asked GLG for his inputs, rather than taking offense....... Simply change your time horizon. Theres nothing wrong with that, but its better to look into what some one else suggests. If he is wrong, then prove it. By the way, the ICAC came out with a crappier assessment of world cotton demand yesterday. The entire futures curve seems over-priced for the time being.
    Pray for bad weather.
    2008 Apr 03 02:53 PM | Link | Reply