Stagflation in the 1970s vs. Today’s Economy
-
Font Size:
At first glance, the inflation picture from the 1970s doesn’t look anything like the economic conditions that we are facing in today’s market. However, there are distinct correlations between the 1970s and today that need to be identified.
Specifically, the Investment Rate tells us that consumer liquidity levels were declining steadily between 1969 and 1981. This encompasses the stagflation period of the 1970s. Further, the Investment Rate tells us that consumer liquidity levels have peaked in 2007 and that they are poised to decline steadily for the next 16 years. The distinct correlation is that consumer liquidity levels declined significantly during the 1970s and they are poised to decline significantly from this point forward.
Consumer liquidity levels on a macro basis do not decline often. In fact there have only been two distinct periods of prolonged declines in consumer liquidity levels since 1900. The first decline in consumer liquidity levels occurred between 1928 and 1938. The market, during this time, provided an annual compounded rate of return of -6.4% to investors. This was also the first downtrend in the Investment Rate and it was better known as the Great Depression.
Then, between 1938 and 1965 consumer liquidity levels increased year after year; the slope of the Investment Rate was positive for this duration. The market during this period of time also increased substantially. Specifically, during this uptrend in the Investment Rate the market provided a +6.85% compounded rate of return to the investor; this was a time when consumer liquidity levels were steadily increasing.
Over time consumer levels of liquidity do increase substantially, but there are distinct periods of decline in consumer liquidity levels that have already proven critical to the health of the economy and the stock market. The first was the Great Depression, and the second was the Stagflation period of the 1970s. Officially, we have now entered into the 3rd major down period in US History according to the Investment Rate, which is a leading indicator of consumer liquidity levels.
The correlation between the 1970s stagflation landscape and today’s economic environment is that consumer liquidity levels are declining proven by the slope of the Investment Rate.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Ecolab: Strong Price Momentum and High Quality Financials
- Assurant Is A Compelling Short Sell
- Broadcom Enters FTTH Chipset Market
- Another Macroshares Oil Arbitrage Opportunity
- Freeport McMoran: With Copper Prices Rising, It's Still a Buy
- Oil and the Futures Market
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- High Likelihood of a Market Crash »
- Time To Start Buying Some Dogs? »
- Sirius-XM Combination: A Future Microsoft Acquisition? »
- 7 Stocks I'm Buying Now »
- High-Yield Canadian Royalty Trusts: What's the Catch? »
- JP Morgan Offer for Wachovia Makes Sense »
- Adding to My GE Position »
- 7 Stocks for a High Yield Cash Flow Portfolio »
- Drybulk Shipping: Prepare for a New Record High »
- Nokia: Bargain of a Lifetime - Barron's »
- Top 10 Payout Yield Stocks »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Time Warner's Due for a Comeback - Barron's
- Pep Boys: Price Skid Presents Long Opportunity
- Spectra Energy: Gas Pipelines Make Great Recession Proof Stocks
- Barron's Drinks to Constellation
- Adding Wood to Your Portolio: A Worthwhile Investment
- Arkansas Steel: 10 Structural Changes That Should Trump the Business Cycle
- Gross Margin Drivers at Potash Corp. (Part II)
- A New Strategy for EXACT Sciences
- Cytori Therapeutics: The Stem Cell 'Celution' for Success
- LDK Solar: The Brightest Opportunity?
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Crystal River’s Q2 Write-Downs Could Bankrupt the Company
- Assurant Is A Compelling Short Sell
- Fuel Systems Solutions: Time to Take Profits
- GM an Unlikely Hero - Fast Money Recap (7/1/08)
- Pair Trade Visa and Capital One
- Amazon's Kindle Numbers: All Fluff, Zero Substance
- A. Schulman: Cashless Profits
- Titan Machinery: Doesn't Anybody Look at Valuation?
- Goodrich Petroleum: Gas in the Ground Doesn't Mean Cash in the Bank
- Outlook Remains Grim for MBIA, Ambac
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- StanCorp a Safe Financial - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/2/08)
- Momentum Stocks Stalled - Cramer's Stop Trading! (7/3/08)
- Expecting a Lift for Pediatrix: Cramer's Mad Money (7/3/08)
- The Most Bullish Thing - Cramer's Stop Trading! (7/1/08)
- Exelon's Got Nukes - Cramer's Lightning Round (7/1/08)
- Prescription Prediction for Allscripts - Cramer's Mad Money (7/1/08)
- Rex Marks the Spot - Cramer's Lightning Round, (6/30/08)
- Medicare Bill Buys - Cramer's Mad Money (6/30/08)
- Cracker Bottom of the Barrel - Cramer's Lightning Round (6/27/08)
- Britannia Bulk Rules the Waves - Cramer's Mad Money (6/27/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Most Popular Feeds
-
ETFs
-
US Market
-
Long Ideas
-
Alt. Energy
- Full list of feeds »
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers:
- Search jobs by category
- Get job alerts by email or live feed
- Apply online
Employers
- See all recruitment options
- Get applications online or by email



This article has 10 comments:
McSpadden
Will the legislation passed a few years ago that complicated bankruptcy laws on credit card debt exacerbate the problem?
The dangers of analyzing "ex a variable" can lead to wrong conclusions.
ND-Goods are greatly affected by food & energy.
I created an index of ND-Consumption/Wages and it shows that
a greater proportion of Wages is going to ND goods and, therefore, less to Discretionary Spending.
see "ANALYZE ex THIS!"
wrahal.blogspot.com
www.wrahal.blogspot.co...
Further, consumer liquidity by my definition relates directly to the amounts of excess capital consumers have to make investments into our economy. The anaysis is derived by evaluating lifetime investment patterns as they relate to systematic and aggressive investments all inclusive.
Details can be found here:
www.stocktradersdaily....
Good trading.
THK.
If our conomy is as weak as The Investment Rate suggests, foreign investments will be a negative, not a positive, as foreigners pull money out of the US and place it in healthier economies across the globe.